Im starting to get the feeling that this fight is going to happen. Lee was "ordered" to fight his mando, I think its saunders not to sure right now lol... So that leaves quillin without a fight and since that new news about floyd vs pac, I'm positively hopefull that fight happens, would scratch floyd-cotto 2 off the table. On top of that Canelo-Kirkland is going to happen. You also have GGG-Murray already set... All that leaves is Cotto vs Quillin, in June, in MSG.
http://commdiginews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cotto-Belt-CFTR.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11112/111122518/4291449-2228919277-vs.pn.png
http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/images/photos/002/852/437/hi-res-ffae65f1ae23895f011588d058380c92_crop_north.jpg?w=630&h=420&q=75
Hes not my "hero" as you put it. I already had stated plenty of times that cotto needs to fight GGG or vacate and go back down to 154 lbs.
why make a quillin thread if ggg will be available in june??
if he cant fight floyd or canelo the next big fight is ggg, no more excuses from cotto...
Please post an explanation as to why you would think that? Can everyone else do the same? It would eliminate alot of anyone one sentence types of posting.
Quillin is the significantly bigger man, has good pop at the weight, fights well from range, and would likely head into the fight fully healthy. You add that Cotto isn't some murderous puncher, and he walks into the fight disadvantaged on almost every aspect.
If you thought that Trout was a rough matchup, Quillin is a worse matchup.
Golovkin doesn't have 1 person on his resume better than probable hall of famer Winky Wright. Not one. And lets not even get started comparing Cottos resume to Golovkin.
Are you fcukin kidding? Winky had not fought in over 3 years, and hadnt won in over 5 years! Wow, where do they find these clueless posters?
How so? GGG is about to destroy his 6th Ring top 10 mw opponent in 2.5 years. Quillin fought 1, same as Cotto
Golovkin doesn't have 1 person on his resume better than probable hall of famer Winky Wright. Not one. And lets not even get started comparing Cottos resume to Golovkin.
Im starting to get the feeling that this fight is going to happen. Lee was "ordered" to fight his mando, I think its saunders not to sure right now lol... So that leaves quillin without a fight and since that new news about floyd vs pac, I'm positively hopefull that fight happens, would scratch floyd-cotto 2 off the table. On top of that Canelo-Kirkland is going to happen. You also have GGG-Murray already set... All that leaves is Cotto vs Quillin, in June, in MSG.
http://commdiginews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Cotto-Belt-CFTR.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11112/111122518/4291449-2228919277-vs.pn.png
http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/images/photos/002/852/437/hi-res-ffae65f1ae23895f011588d058380c92_crop_north.jpg?w=630&h=420&q=75
If GGG takes out Murray Quick Enough. GGG vs Cotto could become a reality much sooner than you think
ggg will be available for a fight in june, after all thats a bigger name and his official mando... will your hero man up this time?
Hes not my "hero" as you put it. I already had stated plenty of times that cotto needs to fight GGG or vacate and go back down to 154 lbs.
I see youre a boxrec warrior. Just about everyone had Macklin beating Sturm, for example. Most had Murray beating a better version of Martinez than Cotto faced etc. Watch the fights, dont just look up boxrec, esp if you wanna "debate" them lol
"boxrec warrior" lmao nice try to discredit me. All I mentioned murray was that he didn't fight GGG yet. I had macklin > STURM 115-113 and lets not act like if it was robbery of the year. I watched the fights and also had murray over martinez. Especially when the ref didn't call martinez being knocked down. Funny how you didn't mention anybody else that I put in my comment. Try again though. You're almost there.
Quillin beats Cotto, on size and height alone. Cotto has never fought anyone as big and tall as Quillin, the last time he had to fight someone who was significantly bigger than him he lost decisively(Trout). That being said if Cotto somehow beat one of the biggest coward in boxing("Golovkin should move up to 168"), I would forgive him for all the diva bull**** in the Canelo negotiations.
Im starting to get the feeling that this fight is going to happen. Lee was "ordered" to fight his mando, I think its saunders not to sure right now lol... So that leaves quillin without a fight and since that new news about floyd vs pac, I'm positively hopefull that fight happens, would scratch floyd-cotto 2 off the table. On top of that Canelo-Kirkland is going to happen. You also have GGG-Murray already set... All that leaves is Cotto vs Quillin, in June, in MSG.
ggg will be available for a fight in june, after all thats a bigger name and his official mando... will your hero man up this time?
Again for the third time, where did I say that your statement was incorrect? My statements are ALSO correct. You just dont want to debate them do you?
Here give it a try:
"The same macklin that lost to sturm and martinez? Name ONE notable fighter macklin has beaten?"
"Geale? Whats his notable wins? Sturm and mundine."
"stevens? Really? Every time stevens stepped up, he failed. Even early in his career he struggled against a guy that lost 5 STRAIGHT!!! Marcos Primera?? That guy stopped stevens?"
"Proksa??? You have got to be kidding me. Did you know his two fights before GGG he fought a guy that was 1-1-0 and then a guy that was 17-3"
Theres nothing "butthurt" about those comments that I posted. Can't counter??? Simply just stfu and let the big boys post. Kids need to go away.
I see youre a boxrec warrior. Just about everyone had Macklin beating Sturm, for example. Most had Murray beating a better version of Martinez than Cotto faced etc. Watch the fights, dont just look up boxrec, esp if you wanna "debate" them lol
As I said, 6 Ring ranked opponents is a statement of fact which you could have looked up yourself instead of venting your hurt feelings here. Stop wasting my time dumbsh1t
Again for the third time, where did I say that your statement was incorrect? My statements are ALSO correct. You just dont want to debate them do you?
Here give it a try:
"The same macklin that lost to sturm and martinez? Name ONE notable fighter macklin has beaten?"
"Geale? Whats his notable wins? Sturm and mundine."
"stevens? Really? Every time stevens stepped up, he failed. Even early in his career he struggled against a guy that lost 5 STRAIGHT!!! Marcos Primera?? That guy stopped stevens?"
"Proksa??? You have got to be kidding me. Did you know his two fights before GGG he fought a guy that was 1-1-0 and then a guy that was 17-3"
Theres nothing "butthurt" about those comments that I posted. Can't counter??? Simply just stfu and let the big boys post. Kids need to go away.
Really? Its called "DEBATING" :pat: Nowhere did I say that your statement was incorrect. All I did was basically give you some details, which you never even attempted to counter, and you come up with "this" sorry ass reply. Go troll somewhere else
As I said, 6 Ring ranked opponents is a statement of fact which you could have looked up yourself instead of venting your hurt feelings here. Stop wasting my time dumbsh1t
You replied to me full of butthurt. Turns out I was right. Dry your tears, next time do your research first before whining in public
Really? Its called "DEBATING" :pat: Nowhere did I say that your statement was incorrect. All I did was basically give you some details, which you never even attempted to counter, and you come up with "this" sorry ass reply. Go troll somewhere else
seems like, again, you cant counter what I stated. Where did I say that your statement was wrong?
You replied to me full of butthurt. Turns out I was right. Dry your tears, next time do your research first before whining in public
I made a statement of fact. You can go back and check, all these guys were Ring top 10 at the time. Sorry that makes your butt ache so much.
seems like, again, you cant counter what I stated. Where did I say that your statement was wrong?