Pacquiao vs Mayweather i done get banned

Floyd is right though, Pac doesn't deserve an even split with Floyd at all. No one does and Pac's recent losses have made sure of that too. If he'd taken the fight when it was on the table a few years ago, with the drug testing, at that point I could see a 50-50 + winner bonus but right now Pac doesn't even deserve 30%. I'd say Floyd is actually being generous offering 40%. Totally agree. This is too generous. That's what Pac's side is hoping and praying for. I think that's what's holding the negotiations. Floyd is shooting for 70/30, and at the max, 65/35. Even this is generous. Pac doesn't deserve 60/40. 75/25 or 70/30 is cool. Make the fight fast!

how can an impossible solution be a perfect one? mayweather would never agree to that and frankly he shouldnt. its extremely unfair and makes no sense. floyd is entitled to the majority share regardless of the outcome so why would he gamble it? if 60% of something was rightfully yours, why gamble it to win nothing in addition? you would just take your 60% and if you would gamble it would be to make it 70 or 80. thats all too messy not to mention dangerous given you cant trust the judges. they are just going to have to negotiate until they come to a solution everyone is happy with if making such a deal is possible. the deal proposed by OP would be laughed at, literally. even by pacs side. his lawyers would be like "what moron thinks we could even ask let alone expect to receive that?". might as well ask floyd to buy jinkee a new kitchen.

60/40 is fair.

...If this fight is made it will be on Mayweather's terms... ... Floyd will dictate the split, the venue, the gloves, the ring, the ref, the judges, the mouthpiece, the shoes, the shorts, a.s.o. (It would be nice, though, if they eventually give some big money to charity...)

Solution to what??? fight is almost signed....wtf do we need all these damn threads about the same damn thing?? fvck the split who fvcking cares? WAR LARRY!!!!!!! And agree!!

Holyfield took a much smaller purse to fight Tyson the first time and WON, then could command a much larger sum the second time.Pacquaio should just give Mayweather the 60% he wants,knock his ass out and then he can be the A-side and tell him no rematch without a greater split.

I don't these guys will ever come up with a good deal, mostly because Floyd is too stubborn. Floyd deserves more, but 60/40?

60/40 split with lions share going to Floyd is fine with me. Actually the split can be 99/1 for whoever and as long as the guy getting less agrees its ok with me. I wont see a single cent from it anyway.

Pic of the negotiations: https://mytrainerchris.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/mathematics-chalkboards_003104581.jpg

These is no issue..they are negotiating the fight and neither side is complaining...only the posters here are complaining

The real issue is what network, HBO or SHO, is going to get the fight.

Solution to what??? fight is almost signed....wtf do we need all these damn threads about the same damn thing?? fvck the split who fvcking cares?

Here you go Public_Enemy... Bad Decisions are a problem and that's why my split makes sense. My solution gives an UNDISPUTED DECISION KNOCKOUT WIN A TRULY DESERVED 60/40 SPLIT A DISPUTED DECISON WIN ON POINTS WOULD GIVE A 55/45 SPLIT. IMAGINE BRADLEY vs PACQUIAO (1st fight) Going down as your 60/40??? Or as someone wake suggested a 65/35 decision win??? Would that have been fair??? Heck No!!! This way a disputed points decision minimizes that unfairness to only a 10% difference. They can make it up in a rematch! It just doesn't make sense from Mayweather's pov. 60-40 is fair for both men.

Inb4 the ban

Too many bad decisions in the sport for a fighter to make that kind of deal. It would be silly for someone in Floyd's position to take it. 60-40 is fair. Here you go Public_Enemy... Bad Decisions are a problem and that's why my split makes sense. My solution gives an UNDISPUTED DECISION KNOCKOUT WIN A TRULY DESERVED 60/40 SPLIT A DISPUTED DECISON WIN ON POINTS WOULD GIVE A 55/45 SPLIT. IMAGINE BRADLEY vs PACQUIAO (1st fight) Going down as your 60/40??? Or as someone wake suggested a 65/35 decision win??? Would that have been fair??? Heck No!!! This way a disputed points decision minimizes that unfairness to only a 10% difference. They can make it up in a rematch!

Too many bad decisions in the sport for a fighter to make that kind of deal. It would be silly for someone in Floyd's position to take it. 60-40 is fair.

Problem with your 65/35 Winner split. So Bradley would have deserved the 65% on that bad decision over Pac in their 1st fight? AND I'M A BRADLEY FAN WHO THOUGHT HED BEAT BOTH PAC & MAYWEATHER!!! (before the 1st Pac fight of course, but even now I think Bradley gives Mayweather fits!!!)

Ha Ha, your a joke.... As is Mayweathers excuses over the last 5 years. All was agreed upon in 2009-2010, Even the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP Nevada drug testing policy! But Arum was protecting Pac from being another Mayfeather "broken word" victim as Mayfeather did in the Marquez fight. Arum protected Pacquiao by stipulating a $1 Million per pound over limit penalty if Mayweather came in heavy like he did against Marquez (4 lbs at weigh in, 20 lbs at fight time). The reason for this is simple... There was an agreed upon weight Mayweather was to come in at (142lbs) since Marquez was jumping from 130 lbs in 2008 and then fight Mayweather in 2009 (144 limit) That's a 14 pound difference!!! (READ & WEAP here: http://www.examiner.com/article/cheating-floyd-mayweather-comes-4-pounds-heavy-for-marquez-fight ) Here's another pointing out the real cheater: http://m.espn.go.com/extra/boxing/story?storyId=4485941&src=desktop ) (READ & WEAP here: http://www.examiner.com/article/cheating-floyd-mayweather-comes-4-pounds-heavy-for-marquez-fight ) Here's another pointing out the real cheater: http://m.espn.go.com/extra/boxing/story?storyId=4485941&src=desktop ) So Mayweather countered with "above and beyond Nevada drug testing rules" and insisted on day of fight drawing of blood testing. Even though Nevada drug testing includes IMMEDIATE AFTER FIGHT TESTING. Mayweather specifically wanted same day drug testing excuse because he knew Pac had an issue with drawing of blood on same day of fight since he experienced weakness/fatigue in the loss to Morales which also had same day drawing of blood test. SO WHY WOULD PACQUIAO GIVE YET ANOTHER ADVANTAGE TO MAYWEATHER HERE? Pac is the smaller man coming up in weight to fight Mayweather! Why would he give him that additional psychological edge? TRUTH!!! ;-) YO MAN, STEP YO GAME UP!!! ;-/

Floyd is right though, Pac doesn't deserve an even split with Floyd at all. No one does and Pac's recent losses have made sure of that too. If he'd taken the fight when it was on the table a few years ago, with the drug testing, at that point I could see a 50-50 + winner bonus but right now Pac doesn't even deserve 30%. I'd say Floyd is actually being generous offering 40%.

perfect solution: winner gets 65% & loser gets 35% end of story.. lets get this sht on!