Who's the better boxer.. Bradley or Algerie

nah, bradley is much quicker, the lateral movement is probabley up to debate, but i'd also say bradley the difference with bradley and algieri when they are both on the move, is algieri lets both hands go constantly and while moving, bradley likes to jab around you or dive in with quick shoeshines etc, algieri is constantly fienting you and trying to be as random and sporadic as possible, always on the move, which is good, but his defense aint great, he's not fast, his footspeed is slow also(footspeed not to be confused with footwork, we know he can move) and his power is not respectable for the most part, occasional left hook with something on it, right hand is pretty much non-existent that's all i can think from what i saw a month back, given up trying to study this guy, too boring are you saying algieri is better or what? what you wrote made no sense, no offence

bradley by a country mile. algieri is tall for the weight, while bradley is short. there's a difference.

Bradley is by far the better of the 2. Maybe on Nov 23rd some opinions may change about Algieri, would be a better topic after we see how he does against Pac. Pac will let us know! Lol

nah, bradley is much quicker, the lateral movement is probabley up to debate, but i'd also say bradley the difference with bradley and algieri when they are both on the move, is algieri lets both hands go constantly and while moving, bradley likes to jab around you or dive in with quick shoeshines etc, algieri is constantly fienting you and trying to be as random and sporadic as possible, always on the move, which is good, but his defense aint great, he's not fast, his footspeed is slow also(footspeed not to be confused with footwork, we know he can move) and his power is not respectable for the most part, occasional left hook with something on it, right hand is pretty much non-existent that's all i can think from what i saw a month back, given up trying to study this guy, too boring Listen to this man, he knows his boxing.I don't know how to send good karma but that was very insightful and definitely deserving of some.

We're comparing a guy that hasn't beaten a top contender versus a guy who has beaten about ten if them? Algieri is a C level fighter until proven otherwise.

I gotta' go with Bradley at this point.

Bradley by miles. Algieri is probably quicker and has better lateral movement but Bradley controls distance better, has a better understanding of combinations, knows when to stay in the pocket and when to get away, is braver, probably has a better chin, is far smarter and has the better punch variety. There /thread nah, bradley is much quicker, the lateral movement is probabley up to debate, but i'd also say bradley the difference with bradley and algieri when they are both on the move, is algieri lets both hands go constantly and while moving, bradley likes to jab around you or dive in with quick shoeshines etc, algieri is constantly fienting you and trying to be as random and sporadic as possible, always on the move, which is good, but his defense aint great, he's not fast, his footspeed is slow also(footspeed not to be confused with footwork, we know he can move) and his power is not respectable for the most part, occasional left hook with something on it, right hand is pretty much non-existent that's all i can think from what i saw a month back, given up trying to study this guy, too boring

Both seems to have good footwork and stamina. Who do you think is the better boxer of the two? Bradley by miles. Algieri is probably quicker and has better lateral movement but Bradley controls distance better, has a better understanding of combinations, knows when to stay in the pocket and when to get away, is braver, probably has a better chin, is far smarter and has the better punch variety. There /thread

Height and weight are the only key attributes of Algieri So basically we can conclude that Algieri is fvck!!!

Bradley is more versatile, he can beat you coming forward ( unless your name is Manny Pacquiao), or stepping back countering, on the ropes or in the middle of the ring. Algieri does not appear to be a slouch, but of the couple fights or so that I've seen he just relies on fighting one way: out hustling opponents and evading punishment with flashy footwork. Algieri was tested in his last fight, but I wonder how he'd fare if he gets tagged by a fighter who is more disciplined than Ruslan Provodnikov Bradley's versatility is a big plus in his column. We'll get a sense of just how good a boxer Algieri is after the Pac fight. From what I've seen of him he looks disciplined and sharp, but somewhat one-dimensional.

Bradley is more versatile, he can beat you coming forward ( unless your name is Manny Pacquiao), or stepping back countering, on the ropes or in the middle of the ring. Algieri does not appear to be a slouch, but of the couple fights or so that I've seen he just relies on fighting one way: out hustling opponents and evading punishment with flashy footwork. Algieri was tested in his last fight, but I wonder how he'd fare if he gets tagged by a fighter who is more disciplined than Ruslan Provodnikov

Tim and its not even close

Both seems to have good footwork and stamina. Who do you think is the better boxer of the two? Bradley. Algieri has good movement but Tim has the sharper, crisper counter punching and better combination punching. Also, Tim has a better jab than Algieri does and better head movement.

Bradley , no doubt Chris is tall and has the reach advatantage so it fits his style perfectly but he aint that good, id say he's about the caliber of a paulie malginalgi...

Based on resume you have to go with Bradley. He has done better against top flight competition. Algeri is somewhat unknown and he comes into most fights with physical advantages of height, reach and weight over most of his competition at 140 lbs. Basically a bigger guy (who has no power) cutting weight to level the playing field.

i think algieri has better movement, but bradley has slightly better skills... i would say its a toss up.