How the F*** has Khan not earned his shot at Floyd...........when

I think Khan needs to beat some hypejob like Broner or Berto to ''Earn'' his shot. i would love to see him fight Broner, but Broner wants no part of Khan

Let me get this right.... YOU WANT TO REWARD KHAN THE MAYWEATHER FIGHT BASED ON WHAT HE DID AT 140? Mind you this is not even what he did recently, this was stuff he did 2-3 Years ago that his fans are holding on to. :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: This is PROOF that most "Boxing Fans" today are Fans Of Boxers and not a Fan of the Sport. Last time Khan fought a legit fighter (Danny Garcia) HE LOST! All Khan have to do is fight a beat at Top 10 Welterweight and people will start to take him getting shot a Mayweather SERIOUS. But instead he and his fans want him to get a shot the cheapest and the safest way possible and that is why he is getting ZERO RESPECT

Maidana was on a decent win streak and looked especially impressive beating Broner. Khan got beat by Peterson, KO'd by Garcia, floored by Diaz, and beat an over the hill Collazo. I say Maidana deserved it more. Oh and Maidana at least had a belt at WW. So yeah, Khan hasn't done better than Chino to deserve a Floyd fight. Re-word that to Khan got cheated by PEDerson and somehow the decision still stands it's amazing to me how he was proven on PED's and some people still refuse to acknowledge that.' Especially Floyd fans who are supposedly tryin to clean up the sport SMDH!!!!! Funny how it's only conditional when it comes to stteroids.

How has Khan earn a shot at Mayweather? By beating the legendary Collazo? By lasting as long as he did with Danny Garcia? Give it a rest, nobody wants to see this fight. WRONG!!!!! I would love to see this fight!!! Khan poses different challenges with his length,speed, and ability to box that Floyd has not had to deal with, not to mention there is NO threat of Khan gettting hurt. Not saying Khan would win , but it's a risky fight which is why Khan will never see this fight. Floyd wants slow flat footed stationary fighters, continue to re-run the same type of opponents. This would be a very inntriguin fight that we will never see and only Khan haters dont wanna see.

When he just fought Maidana whom Khan beat?? also whom Kotelnik beat (Khan's leftover)?? Maidana earned it beating Broner,Soto Karass and LOPEZ LMAO???? Maidana also has unfinished business against Khan Guerrero earned it against Aydin,Berto? (LOL) and Ortiz? by losing to Maidana and beating Berto? (LOL) How in the earth Khan has not earned it,if this is the standard to earn Floyd fight? Floyd fans and Khan haters put whatever sh*t possible on forums to ridicule Khan cause Khan ''IS A THREAT TO MAYWEATHER'' every boxing trainer/expert has said it. The key thing here is '' The criteria that Floyd fans put of earning a fight against Floyd HAS NOT been followed by several of his previous opponents''. Khan has a resume with wins over names like '' Kotelnik,Barerra,Malignaggi,Judah,Diaz,Collazo,Maidana now compare it with Guerrero/Ortiz/Maidana's resume. Why do you think Floyd avoided his Poll results and opted to fight the loser of his Poll? Khan is a Stylistic Nightmare for Floyd and I'd even say that he can beat him if they meet. I highly doubt that Floyd takes this fight now. You guys just want Floyd to fight another easy, slow fighter yet again. JUST fought maidana? Try JUST fought him over 3 F*CKING years ago. You f*cking moron.

Lol I got some redk's for making this thread. People can't swallow the facts. Khan would beat Floyd if FLoyd ever mans up to fight him.

You discount the fact that two of his biggest losses were highly controversial and disputed. He has mixed it with good names at welterweight. He is a two weight world champion. I just find it very rich that someone who talks up Brook so much can talk about Khan not having a good win for 4 years when Brook didn't have won for over a decade and Collazo would be the best name on his resume outside of Porter who isn't that good either. I don't, and never have, talked up Brooks resume. I said very openly how good I thought Brook was as a fighter and that he will prove it when he gets to world level...He's taken the first step to doing that. Kell has one really good win on his resume, that's it. He's just started to build his resume and I have no problem saying that. Khan has some good wins on his record, problem is that the last legit good win was Maidana 4 years ago. In that time period he has a couple of half decent wins and two losses.

WTF now Khan has a chance to beat Floyd? WTF is happening on NSB. First Manny can beat Floyd and now Khan. And sure enough when Floyd beats the piss out of them both Khan will glass chinned and green. And when he beats the hell out of Many he will be old, shot, without peds, without ariza etc Rinse and repeat on this site. You guys want him to lose soooooooo bad and it burns that it will NEVER happen.

I have not seen the Freddy Hernandez fight but I heard he was injured during it. I never once claimed Collazo was a great opponent, I thought he was a decent first fight at 147 for Khan though. Claiming Khan hasn't done anything for 4 years is just ludicrous I agree saying Khan hasn't done anything for 4 years is just ludicrous. He beat Judah impressively and topped Maidana in that time period. I believe a lot of the resistance to Khan getting a Mayweather payday is based more on the fact Khan is 3-2 in his last five fights and the three wins were not considered big wins by most followers of the sport. I personally think a win over a fighter like Brook would open a door for a Mayweather payday without question.

People seem to forget that Collazo was dropped and beat by Freddy Hernandez since his fights with Hatton and Berto. Hernandez was coming off a first round ko loss to Berto when he showed he was better than Collazo. Yes he might have beat Hatton, but that was eight years before he fought Khan. Collazo was brought in to make Khan look good and played his part well. I have not seen the Freddy Hernandez fight but I heard he was injured during it. I never once claimed Collazo was a great opponent, I thought he was a decent first fight at 147 for Khan though. Claiming Khan hasn't done anything for 4 years is just ludicrous

You act like he gets blown out when he fought on terms with both Hatton and Berto. He arguably won both those fights. Fought well against Mosley too. Terrible slant. Collazo is a good win for your first fight at Welterweight and completely trumped any win that Brook had. People seem to forget that Collazo was dropped and beat by Freddy Hernandez since his fights with Hatton and Berto. Hernandez was coming off a first round ko loss to Berto when he showed he was better than Collazo. Yes he might have beat Hatton, but that was eight years before he fought Khan. Collazo was brought in to make Khan look good and played his part well.

Maidana kicked broners ass. Khan fought Collazo in a boring clinch fest. Before that he beat Julio Diaz but he hit the deck in the process. Amir isn't really hot at the moment. And he looks hella thristy for the fight too.

Khan isn't smart enough to beat Floyd. Khan has one of the lowest ring IQs I've seen for a so-called top class fighter.

When Khan was the frontrunner everyone was going crazy saying how outrageous it is with him being 2-2 in his last 4 fights and only beating Diaz and Molina. Then Mayweather doesn't fight him and it's still a problem. He beat Collazo which was a good win and i would like to see Mayweather vs Khan but it's not like he has got a mind blowing win right now the way you make out.

I don't act like anything. I said he loses every time he fights someone solid, which he does. Go through his resume, with the exception of Ortiz who was attempting a comeback, does Collazo have a single win that is good? He's been a pro for about 15 years and his only notable win came against a washed up , part time actor. Hatton's first fight at 147, in which he looked terrible, still beat Collazo. Berto, an ultimate hype job, beat Collazo. Mosley beat him wide, not going to knock him for that. He lost to Freddy Hernandez and was stopped by Edwin Cassiani - he's just not very good. You discount the fact that two of his biggest losses were highly controversial and disputed. He has mixed it with good names at welterweight. He is a two weight world champion. I just find it very rich that someone who talks up Brook so much can talk about Khan not having a good win for 4 years when Brook didn't have won for over a decade and Collazo would be the best name on his resume outside of Porter who isn't that good either.

You act like he gets blown out when he fought on terms with both Hatton and Berto. He arguably won both those fights. Fought well against Mosley too. Terrible slant. Collazo is a good win for your first fight at Welterweight and completely trumped any win that Brook had. I don't act like anything. I said he loses every time he fights someone solid, which he does. Go through his resume, with the exception of Ortiz who was attempting a comeback, does Collazo have a single win that is good? He's been a pro for about 15 years and his only notable win came against a washed up , part time actor. Hatton's first fight at 147, in which he looked terrible, still beat Collazo. Berto, an ultimate hype job, beat Collazo. Mosley beat him wide, not going to knock him for that. He lost to Freddy Hernandez and was stopped by Edwin Cassiani - he's just not very good.

They earned their shot by being come forward power punching fighters. Floyd doesn't like versatile boxers so he chooses who he wants. http://themissouritorch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Denzel-Washington-Boom-Gif.gif

Nonsense. Collazo is not a good win, it's a decent win. A prime Collazo wouldn't even be a good win..the guy loses every time he fights someone solid. Eddie Hearn looking for a Diaz fight wouldn't have made it good, it would have been another average name on the resume. Instead Brook went and fought Porter...that's a good win. You act like he gets blown out when he fought on terms with both Hatton and Berto. He arguably won both those fights. Fought well against Mosley too. Terrible slant. Collazo is a good win for your first fight at Welterweight and completely trumped any win that Brook had.

They earned their shot by being come forward power punching fighters. Floyd doesn't like versatile boxers so he chooses who he wants.

Collazo is a far better win than Senchenko. Senchenko is an absolute bum. Please stop embarrassing yourself. Julio Diaz was so good that Hearn tried to secure him for Brook's next opponent after Khan had beat him :lol1: Nonsense. Collazo is not a good win, it's a decent win. A prime Collazo wouldn't even be a good win..the guy loses every time he fights someone solid. Eddie Hearn looking for a Diaz fight wouldn't have made it good, it would have been another average name on the resume. Instead Brook went and fought Porter...that's a good win.