Roach: "Cotto Looking At Kirkland or Andy Lee"

If Cotto fights Canelo instead of GGG, its understandable, but ****ing Andy Lee or Kirkland? Duck... I wouldn't call Kirkland a duck. He isn't as feared as he was back when he was undefeated, but he is still a very dangerous fighter. I am one of those who adamantly believe that Cotto is NOT a 160 fighter. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: "Cotto is THE 160 champion, but he is not a 160 fighter." I'm not saying he shouldn't take on 160 fighters, but he just isn't a 160 fighter. He's tiny compared to a regular middleweight. Holding that belt, however, makes him a legitimate target to be called out by any and all middleweights.

Wait, so they want him to have a soft touch to stay active for Canelo in May, but now they're looking at James Kirkland for a possible PPV fight? Wait....what?

They better keep Cotto away from Kirkland. Cotto won't make it out of that fight standing upright. I can't see Andy Lee being that difficulty a night out for Cotto. Stick with Lee.

Damn Cotto vs Kirkland has war written all over it

Kirkland needs a fight. 1 fight in 2009. 0 in 2010. 6 in 2011. Wowzers. 1 in 2012. 1 in 2013. 0 in 2014 so far. Very unfortunate for one of America's most exciting fighters. But between stints in prison to leaving Golden Boy for 50 Cent, he's done it to himself. Absolutely true!!!

I already told you guys, that Cotto will be fighting Lee for rhe vacant WBC JMW belt! :lol1: What a shit fight!! All the shit you Cotto huggers defend, just contradicts it with fighting Lee.

I already told you guys, that Cotto will be fighting Lee for rhe vacant WBC JMW belt!

Lee is not that good. His balance is terrible and all he has going for him is that he was Emanuelle's fighter. Kirkland is a beast and you never know what you are going to get with him. This is better than Canelo vs Clottey

No. I think both would backfire. He loses both those fights. But he may get a Gift vs Lee. Lee was once trained by one of the best. He doesn't see the final bell if he fights Kirkland. Lee doesn't beat him if he doesn't stop him. Cotto would score pretty easily against Lee as Lee's defence is really weak. But Lee could definitely drop him.

Kirkland eats Cotto alive.

am I the only one who thinks that both fights can backfire? No. I think both would backfire. He loses both those fights. But he may get a Gift vs Lee. Lee was once trained by one of the best. He doesn't see the final bell if he fights Kirkland.

Lee a risk at 160, not so much at 154... cotto beats both. Kirkland a risk and either weight... and the longer it goes on... the worse it gets Would pay for that... but find it hilarious

If Cotto fights Kirkland then I can forgive Cotto for not fighting Golovkin. Kirkland seems more dangerous on paper but in reality Cotto can demolish him. Andy Lee on the other hand is taller, longer and has a sneaky punch that can come out of nowhere with plenty of leverage to seriously hurt Cotto.

Roach: "Cotto Looking At Chinny Bum or Chinny Can"

am I the only one who thinks that both fights can backfire? Lee has a puncher's chance but he's looked pretty terrible since Manny Steward died. With Kirkland you never know what might happen.

I still think Cotto is too small at 160. A fight with Kirkland can end up costing him. But f**** it if he wants it, Kirkland would jump at an opportunity to fight the 3rd biggest draw in boxing.

http://i59.tinypic.com/2zg66p5.jpg

lee does 10 cents on ppv and kirkland a buck fitty

Both are good fights and dangerous for cotto. He is just undersized at 154 let alone 160.

kirkland. i don't care if it's a crap fight. it will be exciting.