80% of boxing media score for Brook over Porter

I had it 9-3 for Brook...117-111 :boxing:

I didn't bother scoring this one ...... That ref sucked big time. Too much holding in the first 7-8 rounds for it to be called a fight. Looked more like I was watching Dancing with the Stars! Porter tried a few things to stop the holding (eg. movement) but I think he should have gauged on what range to avoid the holding and be able to freely punch away. Perhaps he just thought that eventually the ref would be deducting a point and Brooks would have to stop the constant holding. While there were some warnings, that never happened.

Brook lost some early rounds due to not throwing enough punches, but once he got into his rhythm, it was pretty easy for him.

Only had Porter winning 3 rounds, lots of activity from Porter no clean punching. Its not like he even slowed Brook down in the late rounds.

117-111. Clean punching is king

I had it 117-111 for Brook. easy fight to score. Whoever had Porter winning should stop watching boxing

I had 116-112 for Brook

I had it for Brook. I wasn't scoring the fight round by round, but I felt he won the fight clearly.

I honestly do not remember one flush shot Porter landed

I had it a draw but I was watching it on a ****ty stream I might watch it again and rescore it

Ciaran Gibbons (Freelance) : 117-113 Porter Boxing Philosopher : 116-112 Porter Johnathan Mitrosky (LaceUpBoxing) : 116-112 Porter I think these guys should actually try watching the fight next time. WTF???? are they related to Porter?

Hold up...was there suppose to be controversy in this fight???

Was watching it on sky, no idea about the score - all I know is Jim Watt ruined it for me. The moody tartan ****-puppet

I had Brook winning comfortably so I see nothing wrong with the 117 score, his accurate was more efficient and clean but I wouldn't argue if some had it close Ironically, it is similar to the Maidana fight to be honest as far as Porter going to the body and throwing wildly and trying to use inaccurate workrate to fool the judges

i had Brook taking it 115-113

I'm just curious as to how anyone had porter ahead Because they second-guessed that the judges would lean towards the higher work rate and aggression. Trouble is, that only happens if; a) your aggression is moderately effective, not windmilling like a 3 year old, and b) your opponent isn't catching you clean several times per round and rocks you several times in the fight. It was a clearer win for me than Mayweather over Maidana. At least Maidana had some kind of plan.

you say that now. if he signs to fight manny then you will change and have him winning 116-112. No Dunn. Just no.

I ended up with 114-114 (sitting in the last rows of stub hub). The rounds I gave to Porter I did with a lot of hesitancy but I did so because Kell wasn't always keeping with the pace, ineffective as it was. It felt like he was in command of the fight from about the 4th on and he would only lose rounds when he wasn't that active. I dont feel bad about the close card, all i hear from people leaving the venue was "roberry" "joke scores" this and that

the high number surprised me although as the you will see on the article the ave score was close. I scored it 114-114. The 117-111 score i feel is far too wide. So how did you all score the fight? Here is the article with all the scores...... http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/nine-members-of-the-press-believe-shawn-porter-deserved-the-decision-against-kell-brook/ 8-4. 116-112.

I'm just curious as to how anyone had porter ahead