Why doesn't Floyd have to defend his WBA Welterweight title against Thurman who is the WBA #1 contender? Also, How long can Floyd hold the WBA and WBC JR. MW title before he has to defend it?
Hmm I don't see any uproar about pacquiao and the wbo (which is top ranks own sanctioning body)
Just saying you look like a fan boy (probably are) calling out one and leaving out the other... Every "mandatory" for pacquiao just happens to be the next top rank guy he faces
bingo...Manny never defends against a mandatory yet when Floyd fought a mandatory in Guerrero then Canelo it was criticized..and Yes Canelo was his mandatory
Hmm I don't see any uproar about pacquiao and the wbo (which is top ranks own sanctioning body)
Just saying you look like a fan boy (probably are) calling out one and leaving out the other... Every "mandatory" for pacquiao just happens to be the next top rank guy he faces
Even dead people climb the ranks in the wbo ....
No one is going to force Floyd to fight his mandatory. He brings in way too much money for the organizations to strip him. That's the same for the other stars in the sport as well.
If Thurman wants to face Floyd, his best chance is to have a belt in his possession.
If Thurman wants to fight Floyd he needs to trash talk him like Hatton did or take the Mic away from him like Mosley did
No one is going to force Floyd to fight his mandatory. He brings in way too much money for the organizations to strip him. That's the same for the other stars in the sport as well.
If Thurman wants to face Floyd, his best chance is to have a belt in his possession.