Who wins?
I'll go with Bruno. His main weaknesses as a fighter in chin and stamina, Haye is no better in those areas.
Coetzee and McCall are better than any heavyweights Haye beat. Haye would never be as competitive with Lewis, Spoon, and even Tyson (who was rocked by Bruno) as Bruno was.
Haye was even having trouble with an ancient John Ruiz's jab when he let the jab go.
Bruno's jab would give Haye all sorts of hell and his overhand right would do some real damage.
I wonder who would land more rabbit punches.
We're talking skill here, not personalities, right??? You guys are either seeing the past through rose-tinted glasses or just hate David Haye.
Haye is far more gifted in every aspect of the skill department. Bruno had no defense whatsoever, especially under Terry Lawless. He was rigid as hell, never put punches together well, and was woefully easy to hit.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of Big Frank. The best he ever looked IMO was in his effort against Lennox Lewis, which I think is one of the most underrated heavyweight fights there is. It was an incredible fight and Bruno had more heart in his little finger than David Haye will ever dream of.
But Haye would still knock his ass out.
Bruno would be the perfect target for Haye's haymakers. I say it would probably end up like the second fight between Bruno and Tyson where Haye wins by TKO.
big frank is immensely underrated. he had his flaws but he had a jack hammer for a jab and big power in both hands. hed have either stopped haye or beat him to a decision if haye were to be as cautious as he was against wlad
Bruno is too slow, stiff, and chinny for haye. Haye by 8th round ko.
Haye fought a slow stuff in Valuev and barely won. He's even more chinny than Bruno, and he's vulnerable to jabs.
I would gave Haye a 30-35 percent chance of winning