How is Mayweather beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto at MW?

Come on :lol1: Obvious question. Floyd's already handily beaten Cotto. If Floyd were to beat Golvokin at 160 I would be amazed.

Im just wondering how these GGG nut huggers aren't nut hugging Wilder too. He's black. What do I win!?!?!?

GGG is a natural middleweight and he is an all around better fighter than Cotto. Floyd beats GGG IMO. GGG will only have 1 loss in his career. That will be to Andre Ward. GGG will beat Everyone else put in front of him.

Solid bump. Garbageovkin is nothing to brag about. Let's wait until this guy gets a decent with against a decent MW for once before he's hyped to oblivion. He's beaten former two time champion in Geale and multiple top ranked contenders. Let's not be acting like GGG has been beating rank nobodies.

TS if Floyd beats GGG a guy he has never faced and a true MW champ them that does more for his legacy than beating up a guy he already fought and convincingly won. How do u not get it?

Just because he does not have any big name opponents, does not mean he is not a Dominant World Champion with 14 title defenses. He is considered THE MAN at 160. You can try all the hyperbole you desire, but Cotto is just a placeholder. It is so stupid. Everyone at 160 ducks him, including Cotto, and there are some here justifying that duck and others by saying GGG has not fought anyone. Are you all that scared of GGG that you dont want name fighters fighting him?

Because people love to hype up untested KO artists. While Golovkin is winning "Who would win" polls vs Froch, Kessler and is able to duck Ward; Cotto has actually won real fights. Im just wondering how these GGG nut huggers aren't nut hugging Wilder too.

Did Cotto just beat the lineal MW champion of the world or nah? Ive still yet to see any good reason why GGG is a good win for Floyd or Cotto. So far I have "he has a good am back ground" and that hes "undefeated" yet he has a horrible resume. Any more takers on the question? The same Lineal champ that ducked GGG to fight a blown up WW in Cotto? Cotto is lucky to be Lineal champ, DiBella said himself no point in fighting a monster like GGG when Cotto's brings more $$$.

GGG beat the man who beat Sergio, ie Martin Murray GGG is feared and avoided GGG is more feared than Floyd. Everybody wants to beat Floyd and everyone thinks they can. :dead::dead::dead:

Is the thread title question for real? :burner::burner::burner:

How is beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto? Cotto is a much better fighter than Golovkin. Cotto has accomplished more in the sport than GGG ever will. Cottos resumes isnt even on the same planet as GGG's. Cotto is the Lineal MW Champion of the World. What has GGG ever done to be considered a good win? Speak broken english and knock out nobodies? And this is from a guy who enjoys watching him fight and anticipates his next scrap. But lets be serious here for a minute. Now on the flip side for Cotto: How is beating GGG a better win than beating Mayweather? Mayweather is a much better fighter than Golovkin. Mayweather has accomplished more in the sport than GGG ever will. Mayweather's resumes isnt even on the same planet as GGG's. Mayweather is the King of the JMW Division and the WW Division. Cmon NSB get your shyt together. GGG beat the man who beat Sergio, ie Martin Murray GGG is feared and avoided GGG is more feared than Floyd. Everybody wants to beat Floyd and everyone thinks they can.

Because people love to hype up untested KO artists. While Golovkin is winning "Who would win" polls vs Froch, Kessler and is able to duck Ward; Cotto has actually won real fights. This this and this.

He didn't beat Maidana easily. Mehhh...had it 117-111, 116-112 for Floyd at the worst. It was an easy win. Yeah Maidana did a lot of dirty shyt but that didnt make the fight harder for Floyd just made it uglier and you people confused it with being tougher because you arent used to seeing him in "ugly" fights. It was an easy clear cut win. Easy ass rematch too.

its safe to say GGG would decimate Cotto regardless of how he has fought in the past ... therefore he would be a better opponent for mayweather but that fight would never happen that would be the check money couldnt cash and he is looking to retire undefeated and he isnt going to fight anyone that has a serious potential to take that away from him ... he learned that when he fought Maidana Why is it safe to say that? And what did Floyd learn from Maidana? A guy he easily beat and might fight again?

its safe to say GGG would decimate Cotto regardless of how he has fought in the past ... therefore he would be a better opponent for mayweather but that fight would never happen that would be the check money couldnt cash and he is looking to retire undefeated and he isnt going to fight anyone that has a serious potential to take that away from him ... he learned that when he fought Maidana

Because GGG beat Stevens in his prime. GGG by a brutal MD. Ahhhhhhh thats why. The great Stevens. Shouldve known silly me.

GGG has never met any fighters with the abilities of Cotto and Mayweather. The only thing dangerous about him to the other fighters is that he is a naturally bigger man AND he's in his prime. If Cotto and May were as big as he was they would beat him EASILY.

Floydiots thought Floyd beat everyone else in fantasy fights but in real world your boy is a coward. that's why i just lmao each time a thread like this pops up especially from an idiot like ts. they talk about fraud fighting anybody and beats everyone of them... but in the real world fraud is nothing but a scared coward.

Floydiots thought Floyd beat everyone else in fantasy fights but in real world your boy is a coward.

Because GGG beat Stevens in his prime. GGG by a brutal MD.