Froch dirrell

Running is not winning, save that shit for track and field.

New to this forum, saw a thread on the same topic the other day. Not sure why majority of people on this forum believe froch CLEARLY lost to Andre Dirrell. Froch came forward the whole fight and landed more punches. How is it so obvious and apparent Drirrell was robbed? I would never put it in a category of a "robbery". I personally believe Americans are having trouble with the rising international stars, GGG, Froch, Klits, etc..there always seems to be something that makes these fighters significantly less in the eyes of a lot of Americans- I mean the drirrell- Froch thread was right after Froch destoryed a primed out GOOD super middle.. a way to take away from his performance, what's up with this? sour grapes? mate i was their live and i scored it 4 rounds to froch. We were astonished that it went to a split decision. Dirrell had one good round and got deducted a point in that round. So his best round was a draw. All the pundits agree with your viewpoint. Dirrell was a bloody mess after 4 rounds, froch was unmarked after 12. Dirrell ran, complained, fell over, illegally ducked his head. He was woeful. I called the guy out to go round by round, and he didnt awknowledge frochs best bombs, round 3 and 8, which had dirrell holding. I honestly dont believe mainy people watched the fight. its called going with a band wagon. Anyhow mate froch is a p4p champ and dirrell is sweeping up frochs sweatstains at wembly arena on minimum wage.... good first post btw

I thought my thread is bringing up abit different of a point regarding the not only forum bias toward international stars-i knew someone was going to ask why i posted it here If you would've posted your response in the other thread it would've reached the top just like this one did. What if everyone felt the need to make their own thread because they had a different opinion? What would be the purpose of creating a thread in the first place?!?

It could have gone either way. In the States Andre would have probably got the decision for the cleaner work.

Dirrell schooled him - Froch was punching fresh air all night

Carl Froch landed more punches, :/ did he? Didn't look that way when I watched the fight and I watched it not long ago, Dirrel was snapping the head back of Froch nicely with his superior counter punching it was a great fight to watch.

I thought my thread is bringing up abit different of a point regarding the not only forum bias toward international stars-i knew someone was going to ask why i posted it here

New to this forum, saw a thread on the same topic the other day. Not sure why majority of people on this forum believe froch CLEARLY lost to Andre Dirrell. Froch came forward the whole fight and landed more punches. How is it so obvious and apparent Drirrell was robbed? I would never put it in a category of a "robbery". I personally believe Americans are having trouble with the rising international stars, GGG, Froch, Klits, etc..there always seems to be something that makes these fighters significantly less in the eyes of a lot of Americans- I mean the drirrell- Froch thread was right after Froch destoryed a primed out GOOD super middle.. a way to take away from his performance, what's up with this? sour grapes? So why didn't you post it there?