Lara vs Paul Williams, Sweet pea vs chavez, Bradley vs Pac man 1 even though it was closer than most say pac man won the fight, but sadly he brought out A BIBLE VERSE IN LEVITICUS prior to the bout... the decision was just (the higher ups) putting him in his place for going against the agenda being pushed on the world
Anyone who throws Pacquiao-Marquez in there does NOT know the meaning of a close fight. A robbery is a fight where the grand majority of objective viewers have it wide for a particular fighter, but the result is a wide win for the other. People throw the term "robbery" around so much that it doesn't mean anything anymore.
Every single time we have a close fight, there's ALWAYS someone who utters that word.
A robbery would've been something like Oscar winning more than 2 rounds (in the best case scenario for him) had he made it to the final bell against Pacquiao. In a sport where there is still a degree of subjectivity in the criteria that's used for scoring in professional ranks, there is bound to be mistakes.
This begs the question: Why were people crucifying the overhaul for Olympic boxing scoring (where they count total punches) and whoever scores the most punches wins the fight? It's quick, it's indisputable...
Boxing is a sport but there is so much subjectivity that it keeps it from being taken as serious as other sports. It's a quasi-spectacle.
Has anyone here ever had one of those embarrassing nights when you invite people to catch a fight, and then there's that ONE individual who says, "Boxing is dead. Boxing is corrupt." And then the main event turns out to be a dull fight with iffy scores...and then that same individual who's instigating the "MMA vs Boxing" discussion goes, "See? This is why boxing sucks! I told you all!"
In lieu of this, you can only bury your head and be angry for boxing for being what it is. At this point, it's most likely an acquired taste. I have not met a single person here in the states who says they watch boxing or knows any fighter not named Mayweather or Pacquiao. :/
I 4got about sweet pea...da reason why i didnt consider marquez was that those manny fights were all kinda close to be considered robberies....at off all 3 the 3rd fight was the worst though imo.
1st was a draw 2nd pacquiao won it and 3rd marquez won it on a close decision imo
I'm no Pac fan, but I think one of the biggest robbery's in Boxing was Paquiao vs Bradley 1. Only God know how Bradley won that fight.
I think Bob Arum has an idea.
you've sent me three friend requests, and i've been nice enough to accept them. i can only assume that you were unfriending me for silly reasons, and then resending the request. you are all over the place. you probably got your panties in a bunch over something silly relating to bernard hopkins, likely his obvious use of PEDs.
it's totally reasonable to try and punch jean pascal for asking you to take a PED test. he's clean, bro.
You make some educated posts at times then you go and remind everybody how your head is stuck up your ass
Has anybody been robbed more than Carlos Molina??? LMAO
I'm no Pac fan, but I think one of the biggest robbery's in Boxing was Paquiao vs Bradley 1. Only God know how Bradley won that fight.
Richar Abril
the rios fight is one f the worst robberies i've seen. that was embarrassing for the sport. abril schooled him.
the lundy fight was definitely close, but i had abril ahead along with most of the media at the fight. abril also scored a clean knockdown, lundy wasn't hurt, but a punch caused him to go down.
Here's another one for good measure :bottle:
you've sent me three friend requests, and i've been nice enough to accept them. i can only assume that you were unfriending me for silly reasons, and then resending the request. you are all over the place. you probably got your panties in a bunch over something silly relating to bernard hopkins, likely his obvious use of PEDs.
it's totally reasonable to try and punch jean pascal for asking you to take a PED test. he's clean, bro.