Your choice: Mayweather vs Thurman or Mayweather vs Porter

Lara fights in july, it will be too soon for him to fight floyd if he whoops canelo

I think those two are pretty much the same level opponent but I'd prefer Porter just because it will be a unification bout.

May vs Lara Thurman vs Maidana Porter vs Khan..It's simple..

Too soon for either I think. Another impressive win and people would be really looking to see them in with Floyd.

porter presents more of an interesting fight.

neither.. thurman and porter both need more impressive wins in order for me to have any interest in them fighting floyd. they shoud fight each other and the winner would be an acceptable foe for mayweather.

I want Mayweather vs Lara,Khan vs Porter,and Thurman vs Maidana..Thank you very much..

Paid all my bets. Sound likes a bunch of mouth and nothing more to me. I get it. You run your mouth but got no stones to back it. I don't care if you've paid all your bets you are a guy who makes statements and predictions and then say's you were lying about it when you get it wrong :lol1: Who can trust a guy like that? Not me.

I think Thurman beats Porter, but Porter would stylistically be a harder match-up for Floyd. Porter will swarm Floyd non-stop for 12 rounds, he's a very skilled pressure fighter with a good jab, footwork etc. He's very good physically and athletically as well. Thurman might try fighting at Floyd's pace and get outboxed imo. If he fights on the front foot and pressures Floyd though, he could give Floyd a very hard time as well. I agree with this 100%. I think Thurman handles Porters pressure well and I'd favor him vs Porter. But I think his boxer-puncher style is more suited for Floyd. Porter's constant pressure would be more troubling for Mayweather

You did allude to it, clearly. I already told you I don't wager with people who make predictions and then when they get them wrong say they were "Lying" about it. Paid all my bets. Sound likes a bunch of mouth and nothing more to me. I get it. You run your mouth but got no stones to back it.

Mayweather vs Porter/Khan I say Khan because Porter should fight Kell Brook.

I think Porter has the goods to beat him. Of course there may be some glaring flaw Mayweather exposes that we haven't seen but Porter's youth and menacing attack would be hell for the 37-year-old version.

You did allude to it, clearly. I already told you I don't wager with people who make predictions and then when they get them wrong say they were "Lying" about it. why don't you 2 just kiss and make up,queer fan boys

I think Thurman could pose a bigger threat in the future, and I'd rather wait on that. Not that I'm objecting to the fight if it happened next, but I'd rather see Porter now because I think he's the better fight now, where Thurman would be better a year from now.

I didn't allude to *****. I never said Floyd wouldn't fight Cotto at 154 period. So show me where I said it. But again, I said he wouldn't fight the Punisher. You don't yap about that. And I also said he wouldn't fight Lara he'd either fight Khan or Maidana, which he did. And you also don't yap about that. No one has been 100 percent right. Anyway, I said Floyd won't fight either Thurman or Porter. Care to wager?? You did allude to it, clearly. I already told you I don't wager with people who make predictions and then when they get them wrong say they were "Lying" about it.

maidana without having to wear the sock'em boppers that mayweather made him use. TBE? you are right, The Best Excuses Mayweather

You alluded to it in your thread "Why doesn't Floyd fight Cotto at 154?" Or were you lying when you made that thread? You said Floyd wouldn't fight Shane, then you said he'd get KO'd by Shane. Fast forward 4 years and you said "I was lying" :lol1: What's the odd's you'd be lying about either of these fights if they get made? Pretty high I'd imagine. I didn't allude to *****. I never said Floyd wouldn't fight Cotto at 154 period. So show me where I said it. But again, I said he wouldn't fight the Punisher. You don't yap about that. And I also said he wouldn't fight Lara he'd either fight Khan or Maidana, which he did. And you also don't yap about that. No one has been 100 percent right. Anyway, I said Floyd won't fight either Thurman or Porter. Care to wager??

Please find where I said Floyd won't fight Cotto at 154. I also said Floyd won't fight the Punisher, but you don't yap about that. You alluded to it in your thread "Why doesn't Floyd fight Cotto at 154?" Or were you lying when you made that thread? You said Floyd wouldn't fight Shane, then you said he'd get KO'd by Shane. Fast forward 4 years and you said "I was lying" :lol1: What's the odd's you'd be lying about either of these fights if they get made? Pretty high I'd imagine.

Right, just like he wouldn't fight Shane or Cotto at 154 right? Or let me guess, you were lying when you said that? Please find where I said Floyd won't fight Cotto at 154. I also said Floyd won't fight the Punisher, but you don't yap about that.

It's really hard to say. Last time he fought a fighter who can fight decently on the inside with respectable power was...Diaz. He looked improved in the second fight let alone his last two fights. He's definitely improved his game since then.