WBC wants to unify all the titles to have 1 champion per division!

Wishful thinking but the other bodies must agree as well

Impossible. Simply impossible

I'm all for 1 champion per division. Maybe 2 the most! Would perfer 1 doe.

Its a good idea but it will never happen.

Thought the wbc was stripping their champions of their title if they didn't drop any other belt they won?

This is groundbreaking news if true. What needs to be sorted out is as follows - in a perfect world ofcourse: -Allow boxers to become undisputed -Mandatories must be against deserving contenders -Fighters are not allowed to be stripped only in the most extreme circumstances -Eliminate interim, silver and intergalactic titles -Reduce sanctioning fees

I am split on this issue because I like the idea of champions facing off with each other to unify titles, it creates interesting matchups. On the flip side I'd like one guy to be the #1 guy in each weight class. I think the WBO|WBC|WBA should be the only titles in each division. Anything more than 3 belts is too much. Just my opinion. screw the WBO, it should be the WBC WBA and IBF, the titles guys like Tyson and Lewis unified

I am split on this issue because I like the idea of champions facing off with each other to unify titles, it creates interesting matchups. On the flip side I'd like one guy to be the #1 guy in each weight class. I think the WBO|WBC|WBA should be the only titles in each division. Anything more than 3 belts is too much. Just my opinion. So you want to get rid of the less corrupt sanctioning body, the IBF?

I don't mind there being the four major titles WBC, IBF, WBA, WBO but champions should be allowed to unify without being stripped. All of these super duper interim chrome belts should not be there IMO a well I agree about the interim belts and low tier titles. Those 4 that you mentioned should be 1 commission of sorts.

Don Jose Sulaiman would be proud of you mauricio.....well, not really, that ****sucker...

I don't mind there being the four major titles WBC, IBF, WBA, WBO but champions should be allowed to unify without being stripped. All of these super duper interim chrome belts should not be there IMO a well

Good news for Wlad.

It would be kind of like the UFC I guess, but that wouldn't workout. The WBC is the most corrupt.

http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/news/2522-the-wbc-wants-a-unique-world-champion maybe Mauricio Sulaiman IS good for boxing? Also, who do you guys think will be THE champ in each division? This is even more incentive for Floyd and Pac to fight, I'm sure both would want to be THE champ, unless Floyd gets back on the "Titles don't matter" train I am split on this issue because I like the idea of champions facing off with each other to unify titles, it creates interesting matchups. On the flip side I'd like one guy to be the #1 guy in each weight class. I think the WBO|WBC|WBA should be the only titles in each division. Anything more than 3 belts is too much. Just my opinion.

The Super Six was a good starting point. It maybe went on too long, but it achieved it's goal.

That's only work with all fighters except Floyd, belt don't mean zhit when PAC is in line for Floyds belt. Says belt doesn't define him. Company motto is 'We make champions' :boxing: #TBE

He didn't want the job, but the WBC insisted on him. Hey, as long as he gets rid no unified champs, I'm fine

That's only work with all fighters except Floyd, belt don't mean zhit when PAC is in line for Floyds belt.