Wow Just Rewatched Mayweather-Castillo 1 And...

Yes, Floyd beat Castillo the first time. And the second time Castillo had to concede that Floyd was the best of the division.

Lets face it, no matter how you scored that fight, Castillo dominated that fight. For those who scored it for Floyd, it's because you gave him all the closer rounds where others saw it differently than you .... but the overall fight was clearly won by Castillo..... what I mean is that what Castillo did to Floyd, Floyd didn't do to Castillo.

Castillo clearly won. Floyd's "0" is just a myth. History will tell the true story.

round 1: 10-9 mayweather round 2: 10-9 mayweather round 3: 10-9 castillo round 4: 10-9 mayweather round 5: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 6: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 7: 10-9 castillo round 8: 9-9 (close; but would've given to castillo if he hadn't punched on the break) round 9: 10-9 mayweather(close) round 10: 10-8 castillo round 11: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 12: 10-9 castillo Close to how I saw it

round 1: 10-9 mayweather round 2: 10-9 mayweather round 3: 10-9 castillo round 4: 10-9 mayweather round 5: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 6: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 7: 10-9 castillo round 8: 9-9 (close; but would've given to castillo if he hadn't punched on the break) round 9: 10-9 mayweather(close) round 10: 10-8 castillo round 11: 10-9 mayweather(mayweather landed more clean shots) round 12: 10-9 castillo

I saw the fight completely differently this time. I remember hearing Robert Garcia say when he first saw the fight he thought Floyd won and he changed his mind after rewatching it, having Castillo win. When I first watched the fight I had Castillo winning 7 rounds to 5. This time I saw it differently with Floyd winning 6 rounds, 2 rounds were close and could have gone either way, and Castillo dominating 4 rounds. Remember fights are scored by a round by round basis and even if you out land a guy by 100 punches you can still lose a fight if you lose most of the rounds. I think I was being heavily swayed by Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant the first time I saw the fight. They were giving Castillo rounds that were simply competitive and giving him credit for low blows and rabbit punches. If you ignore the commentary and go in the fight with no bias you'll see a totally different story. The second fight was simply a repeat of the first with Floyd using a little more lateral movement. I thought De La Hoya and Cotto fought a more disciplined fight against Floyd than Castillo did. If you had Floyd winning the fight I don't blame you. It looked more like an off night to me than a loss. No wonder Castillo couldn't win the rematch, he practically lost the first fight. You saw it better the second time. That's basically what happened. Or you could have Floyd winning the first 5 rounds, 4 rounds for Castillo more clearly then their are 3 up for grabs and the outcome depends entirely of how you score them. Round 11 for example was a close round, but i prefer Floyd's work in that round because it was cleaner and from about a min thirty he steps in the pocket and starts beating Castillo at his own game.

First one was close but still in my opinion Floyd edged it. I agree 100%

First one was close but still in my opinion Floyd edged it.

Floyd won both.

Mayweather won the 1st 5 rounds. So unless you're telling me that Castillo won every round from there on, I don't see how you could give the fight to JLC. Best you could call it for JLC was a draw. Mayweather won a very close fight

You're speaking from the toilet. Fucc outta here :rofl: Floyd loss dude...deal with it.

the problem with castilo is that he gave mayweather the first 5 rounds (right off the cup)

I'm not in denial...Im speaking from the heart. You're speaking from the toilet. Fucc outta here :rofl:

45 have tried.......

...and I'm the one in denial lol :bottle: I'm not in denial...Im speaking from the heart.

Nope, do you want me to type the definition of an opinion? No...would you like me to type the definition of denial?

Not a fact. Broner proved it. Broner lost and now he's on the edge of being a nobody. Floyd isn't even ppv worthy. He's hbo boxing after dark at best.

I'm simply saying that is your opinion which is a fact. :bottle: The fact is Floyd loss that fight.

Tim Bradley clearly won Mayweather-Castillo 1 by the score of 8-4. Jackasses.

I thought losses dont matter. All the greats lost right? Or is it that losses dont matter unless it Floyd? Losses don't matter unless it's Floyd. Floyd relies heavily on that 0 loss record and he wouldn't be where he's at if he had a loss.