Did marquez KO proved his better than pac?

Marquez is more skilled, if Pac had the pin point accuracy of Marquez, coupled with his attributes, he would be regarded as the GOAT.

What is laughable is the response in your answer with JMM legs on the mat but some how Pac couldn't see because of the angle WHEN HE WAS LOOKING DOWN ON JMM THEN PAC MAKES A SILGHT PAUES AND POPS HIM GET THE FOCK OUT OF HERE CLOWN .Pac could have been disqualified IT WAS A BLUNT FOUL it should have merit a point being taken away at most PERIOD. cut the crap your kind always bring up the judges error but never bring up the ref error how convenient IT GOES BOTH WAYS CLOWN Stop being bias. Officially it was a knock down but .... Marquez was NOT down except for his hand that touched the canvas. Marquez was NOT completely down as you are making it sound. 1:20 min mark

More skilled at counter punching. :boxing:

Marquez is to pacquiao what norton was to ali

Also Marquez is 40.. 35 year old Marquez would have beat Bradley.

Yes he is more skilled, Pacquiao more talented athletically.

Thanks for making me laugh. I was actually going more for Marquez than Manny in that fight because for one, I wanted to see him make it a fight and come back but also because I like Marquez. From Manny's angle, Marquez could have been viewed as not down as he was on his knees and being held by the ropes and one hand. No ref would have DQed Manny on that play. but to compare that to the judge making a mistake on the number of knockdowns and hence a mistake on the score is laughable. What is laughable is the response in your answer with JMM legs on the mat but some how Pac couldn't see because of the angle WHEN HE WAS LOOKING DOWN ON JMM THEN PAC MAKES A SILGHT PAUES AND POPS HIM GET THE FOCK OUT OF HERE CLOWN .Pac could have been disqualified IT WAS A BLUNT FOUL it should have merit a point being taken away at most PERIOD. cut the crap your kind always bring up the judges error but never bring up the ref error how convenient IT GOES BOTH WAYS CLOWN

If Marquez was as fast and explosive as PAC and had better legs what you think will happen to the world of boxing? His technical mind is too good "IF" is the game changer which marquez does not have and pac happens to have marquez is just superior to pac in counter punching ability but in over all pac has more superiority againts marquez in other aspects, example the one u mentioned, speed and explosiveness, reflexes as i said to my first post counter punching = A+ for marquez, A for pac

no thank you for the laughs it just proves you just watch highlights of the fight :spankme: Thanks for making me laugh. I was actually going more for Marquez than Manny in that fight because for one, I wanted to see him make it a fight and come back but also because I like Marquez. From Manny's angle, Marquez could have been viewed as not down as he was on his knees and being held by the ropes and one hand. No ref would have DQed Manny on that play. but to compare that to the judge making a mistake on the number of knockdowns and hence a mistake on the score is laughable.

So basically what you are saying is that landing a one in a million lucky KO erases basically losing 3 previous fights by decision? Got it. You're just dumb. Over and out. calling people dumb.....i think it was him losing 2 fights, and getting a draw?

lol most of you dudes are just rating marquez at the age of 35+, where he looks old and flat flooted. theres a reason why he got knocked down 3 times and was able to get a draw against pac, dude was in his prime at 30 years old and schooled pacquiao for a majority of the fight. check his fights out when he was younger, dude was on another level.

Lol @ DQ'd. It was a judgement call man get over it and look at the POLL results. I see when its Pac its a judgment call lol how convenient. it is you who needs to get over it and no Pac does not have better boxing skills then JMM period Pac is a better athlete that is all like I said man to man Pac will never be better then JMM period JMM proved it by knocking Pac piss out of your god

Prime Oscar and Shane would have laid a beating on Floyd most likely. Oscar was nasty at 135-140. If he landed his jab and left hook it would have been over. Yes, overall DLH and SSM were more skilled than Floyd. Its just Floyd fought old men, and Floyd was faster because of his youth, and had more stamina. They were still more skilled overall than Floyd in the ring though when Floyd beat them. If were are led to believe jmm is more skilled than Pac, even though Pac beat him 3 times and was leading the fourth fight as well. Then Gatti was more skilled than FLoyd, even though Floyd beat him. Its just Floyd was much faster and hadn't been in any wars. That is the logic we have to go by.

SSM and DLH were more skilled than Floyd. Its just Floyd had more speed. Prime Oscar and Shane would have laid a beating on Floyd most likely. Oscar was nasty at 135-140. If he landed his jab and left hook it would have been over.

Watch the fight and you see Marquez outbox him. Morales and Barrera as well as Pacquaio avoided this man until they had no choice. Barerra was the name at the time, how the hell did Pacquiao avoid him? Stop making yourself look like a Pac hating troll.

SSM and DLH were more skilled than Floyd. Its just Floyd had more speed.

Watch the fight and you see Marquez outbox him. Morales and Barrera as well as Pacquaio avoided this man until they had no choice. I done with you. You are a floydiot alt the way you talk like floydiot troll. LMAO at Pac avoided Marquez even though he fought him 4 times and now asking for a 5th fight. :puke: Avoiding is what you called when you faked your retirement to avoid Oscar rematch, prime Cotto, prime Mosley and prime Margarito.

How the hell you knock someone down three times then get beat to a draw? AND then the judges had to give you the subsequent fights when clearly outboxed only to get put to sleep by a well time punch you be getting hit with since 2004. Do more homework. Pacquiao won mathematically. One of the judges scored the first round incorrectly.

Pacquaio greatness was carefully crafted, just by analyzing who he fought and when he fought them while avoiding JMM until he thought he was old and Pacquiao handlers thought Pacauiao improved. JMM has the mind and skills that surpasses a Pacquiao and fighters that aren't technical. Pacquiao just has size on him, just like everyone else in the welter division. Anyway get to know that great technical brain known as JMM and his skills. http://youtu.be/GfBmqlO6rh4 Oh so JMM was old at 30 years of age now. I see. I guess whatever suits your agenda is par for the course huh?

Marquez is obviously more skilled, Pacquiao is just much more athletic so he can overwhelm his opponents. Marquez fights with his mind better than everyone not named Mayweather. Bradley caught an old Marquez, let it be the JMM a couple years ago, Marquez would had let those combinations set Bradley up with patient calm aggression. Marquez now is impatient and is not being a scientist, if we go off his last performance. Looking at the poll, shows the ignorance that plague this boxing community. Did Marquez caught Barrera on his prime? A lot of people thought a shot Barrera beat prime Marquez and you know what Pac did to a prime Barrera. Marquez skills are only good against Pac styles. Against shot Barrera, Bradley, Chris John, etc...he looked like ordinary.