"i support the boxers decision its a smart move for business"
since when did boxing fans start to become business men?
we are boxing fans we suppose to long for good quality matches to happen not think about "good business match" :dead:
stop caring about how much fighters make we dont get any of it...
lets continue to support fearless fighters and despise the fearful
I imagine this is how half the 'fans' in this place like to spend their time ...http://www.starlinkaccountants.co.uk/images/stralink2.jpg
Me? I'd rather just watch some good fights
What about Stevenson proving he's the best against a far more establish foe in B-Hop..It's not like that fight will not be on the table..Kov can fight Pascal(I hope)and should he win that he also can make the decision to go to Showtime,or maybe even Stevenson comes back to HBO..You can not knock Stevenson for going after a legend..
I'm all for business when it makes sense,which a lot of moves do at times..A lot of fans have school kids mentality's about this sport..Which is not kind to you when you get old..Have to get the legacy and most money possible while you can..That's the reality of this sport..
Stevenson isn't chasing a Hopkins fight to prove he's the best, he thinks he's going to take advantage of a 50 year old fighter for more money. I can absolutely knock someone with that mindset, because in the process Stevenson is walking away from a fight his people apparently agreed to that has just as much interest.
There's a different between understanding business and supporting business because it makes a fighter money. Since when do fans care more about a fighter not fighting the best as long as they are making money? That's not our job, we don't get a cut of that. If we all supported fighters taking the lowest risk for the highest rewards, we'd never get any of the fights we want.
I mean, boxing is still a sport, isn't it? A completely corrupt and ridiculous sport, but still a sport. If the fans start supporting business over the desire to see the best fights, what incentive is there for promoters to continue letting boxing be a sport when they could just sell us mismatches under the guise of business?
Why aren't the best fights the most financially lucrative ones?
Canelo-Floyd happened.
If Stevenson and Kovalev are #1 and #2 then they could just knock every one else off and be the last two standing. Then you have your #1 and #2 being the money fight.
real life boxing fans don't pull that crap
they talk about fights that happen and speculate on non fights
but they don't obsess over contracts and PPV revenue
no fan is receiving a piece of that money so they don't care
you only see that nonsense online when it's agenda convenient
you'd think some posters here are married to the fighter they like most
GBP are killing the sport as much any other a$$hole i.e Haymon & Arum
No wonder people start turning to UFC at least Dana likes to make competitive fights
Why did Leonard, Hagler nor Hearns ever fight McCallum? Isn't this the exact reason? Yet people act like this stuff NEVER happened in boxing and we see constant examples of it. But hey. Whatever.
Did Kovalev really get screwed? His manager said he got an HBO deal which she felt was more important than a world title.
When are fans going to see what is going on. Every time a fight the fans and the network supposedly want doesn't happen-the networks rewards the fighters who are not fighting those fights with big purses for inferior fights. WHy hasn't the network decided not to air those fighters? Networks identify a fight then instead of putting it on get and extra 2 or 4 dates by doing two setup fights for each guy.
HBO, instead of punishing Stevenson for not fighting KKK gave them both an extra fight because they needed dates filled on their calendar. They just got out flanked by Haymon and showtime on this.
The networks get us to watch inferior fights so long as we believe the best fight is on the horizon. well if we fall for that once why should we be surprised we keep doing it?
None of us were agaianst KKK/agnew and stevenson/fonfora so long as we got stevensoen/KKK. Maybe we should've been.
Good post bro,I completely agree..Not to mention,the two best LHW are Stevenson and B-Hop imo..Then KOV and Pascal..So why not let these fights right here get made??No everyone is a duck or messing the sport up..In every sport there is a business side to it,have to learn that just as much as the x's and o's or what's going between the ropes..
Maybe boxing fans should think about who "business decisions" are screwing over as much as they are about who they benefit. Kovalev might be the best LHW in the world. Getting a Stevenson fight and winning might have allowed him to make money he deserved if he proved himself the best. Instead he will probably never get that chance. This man has worked hard to prove himself the best and earn his own money. No one who is supporting "business" seems to care about that though because they are too busy pretending to love that Stevenson is making more money, as if they get a check, too.
It's supposed to be our job as fans to vocalize our opposition against this kind of crap. We're supposed to do our part to make sure at least some of the hundreds of fighters who won't get their fair chance because of "business" do get those chances.
What about Stevenson proving he's the best against a far more establish foe in B-Hop..It's not like that fight will not be on the table..Kov can fight Pascal(I hope)and should he win that he also can make the decision to go to Showtime,or maybe even Stevenson comes back to HBO..You can not knock Stevenson for going after a legend..
I'm all for business when it makes sense,which a lot of moves do at times..A lot of fans have school kids mentality's about this sport..Which is not kind to you when you get old..Have to get the legacy and most money possible while you can..That's the reality of this sport..
Maybe boxing fans should think about who "business decisions" are screwing over as much as they are about who they benefit. Kovalev might be the best LHW in the world. Getting a Stevenson fight and winning might have allowed him to make money he deserved if he proved himself the best. Instead he will probably never get that chance. This man has worked hard to prove himself the best and earn his own money. No one who is supporting "business" seems to care about that though because they are too busy pretending to love that Stevenson is making more money, as if they get a check, too.
It's supposed to be our job as fans to vocalize our opposition against this kind of crap. We're supposed to do our part to make sure at least some of the hundreds of fighters who won't get their fair chance because of "business" do get those chances.
Did Kovalev really get screwed? His manager said he got an HBO deal which she felt was more important than a world title.
When are fans going to see what is going on. Every time a fight the fans and the network supposedly want doesn't happen-the networks rewards the fighters who are not fighting those fights with big purses for inferior fights. WHy hasn't the network decided not to air those fighters? Networks identify a fight then instead of putting it on get and extra 2 or 4 dates by doing two setup fights for each guy.
HBO, instead of punishing Stevenson for not fighting KKK gave them both an extra fight because they needed dates filled on their calendar. They just got out flanked by Haymon and showtime on this.
The networks get us to watch inferior fights so long as we believe the best fight is on the horizon. well if we fall for that once why should we be surprised we keep doing it?
None of us were agaianst KKK/agnew and stevenson/fonfora so long as we got stevensoen/KKK. Maybe we should've been.
I hate it when people ignore the reality of economics in life and act like fighters owe it to fans who wouldn't raise a finger to help them to do whatever will excite them most as if they were free from the worries about lifelong financial stability. That's what I hate.
Thread...Nothing more to see here..
There's a different between understanding business and supporting business because it makes a fighter money. Since when do fans care more about a fighter not fighting the best as long as they are making money? That's not our job, we don't get a cut of that. If we all supported fighters taking the lowest risk for the highest rewards, we'd never get any of the fights we want.
I mean, boxing is still a sport, isn't it? A completely corrupt and ridiculous sport, but still a sport. If the fans start supporting business over the desire to see the best fights, what incentive is there for promoters to continue letting boxing be a sport when they could just sell us mismatches under the guise of business?
Maybe boxing fans should think about who "business decisions" are screwing over as much as they are about who they benefit. Kovalev might be the best LHW in the world. Getting a Stevenson fight and winning might have allowed him to make money he deserved if he proved himself the best. Instead he will probably never get that chance. This man has worked hard to prove himself the best and earn his own money. No one who is supporting "business" seems to care about that though because they are too busy pretending to love that Stevenson is making more money, as if they get a check, too.
It's supposed to be our job as fans to vocalize our opposition against this kind of crap. We're supposed to do our part to make sure at least some of the hundreds of fighters who won't get their fair chance because of "business" do get those chances.
Very well said. I support this message.
Maybe boxing fans should think about who "business decisions" are screwing over as much as they are about who they benefit. Kovalev might be the best LHW in the world. Getting a Stevenson fight and winning might have allowed him to make money he deserved if he proved himself the best. Instead he will probably never get that chance. This man has worked hard to prove himself the best and earn his own money. No one who is supporting "business" seems to care about that though because they are too busy pretending to love that Stevenson is making more money, as if they get a check, too.
It's supposed to be our job as fans to vocalize our opposition against this kind of crap. We're supposed to do our part to make sure at least some of the hundreds of fighters who won't get their fair chance because of "business" do get those chances.
I dislike the business decisions, but I've grown to understand them, unfortunately.
There's a different between understanding business and supporting business because it makes a fighter money. Since when do fans care more about a fighter not fighting the best as long as they are making money? That's not our job, we don't get a cut of that. If we all supported fighters taking the lowest risk for the highest rewards, we'd never get any of the fights we want.
I mean, boxing is still a sport, isn't it? A completely corrupt and ridiculous sport, but still a sport. If the fans start supporting business over the desire to see the best fights, what incentive is there for promoters to continue letting boxing be a sport when they could just sell us mismatches under the guise of business?
I don't like boxing fans that act like financial advisers, defend the duck, and scream atg of duckers.
But I also don't like fans that call every boxer that doesn't produce ko's on a regular boring simply because another fighter has a more exciting style.
For example, the absolute schooling Rigo gave to his son Donaire was probably one of thee most fantastic lessons I've seen in boxing. I honestly don't consider that particular fight boring. In fact I thought it was amazing.
When in the history of the sport has any boxer leaned towards glory? Do you even know what you are saying.
The problem is young fans like you have a misguided notion that fighters are supposed to work for less so you can get entertained. If you truly cared about the sport you would care about the well being of those involved in it.
I laugh every time I see Dunn attempting this kind of condescencion. I mean, its funny because he is a floyd mayweather fan. A guy who 90% of his fanbase are still teenagers and the other 10% just plain stupid. They are the joke of all boxing forums except for in their circle jerk safe havens, i.e Floydhype and WSHH etc.
Sad days for floydgimps.:sad:
"i support the boxers decision its a smart move for business"
since when did boxing fans start to become business men?
we are boxing fans we suppose to long for good quality matches to happen not think about "good business match" :dead:
stop caring about how much fighters make we dont get any of it...
lets continue to support fearless fighters and despise the fearful
your the reason, genius. the **** i put in bold, thats the issue.
its one thing to want the best fights, we all do. but going for the money is going for the money, it doesnt mean a fighter is fearful, it means he is going for the money.
so when some moron says fighter A is afraid of fighter B and someone intelligently points out he isnt scared at all he is just going for the money. the one calling people scared, accusing them of ducking etc is the one who is wrong. not the reasonable fan who is simply pointing out the truth.
doesnt mean he wants it to be like that any more than you do, just means he is a whole lot smarter and is capable of seeing things for what they are.
That's why boxing should be viewed differently now and fans need to make adjustments. Fights now are more like exhibition matches that focus on making the star fighter look good. It's no longer about the best fighting the best. I doubt fans will ever see their dream fights in their lifetimes. When star fighter loses, he's back fighting cab drivers. And fans would be lucky to see fighters fight three times a year.
That's so much BS, let's not let the actions of Floyd Mayweather, ***** boy, dictate the whole of boxing.
Just in recent years we've had Garcia/Matthysse, Rigo/Donaire, Wlad/Povetkin (like it or not it was no. 1 v 2), Wlad/Haye, Pacquiao/Cotto/Marquez/Oscar, Floyd/Mosley, Trout/Lara, Bradley/Pacquiao/Marquez, Rios/Alavardo, these were all important fights, to varying degrees and a lot of them were FOTY candidates.
There are still top fights being made, I haven't even listed the British scene yet, what with Froch/Groves/Ward/Kessler
Like I've mentioned, fans nowadays need to make some adjustments when watching boxing. It takes years and years to see proven fighters fight each other. It's getting more and more expensive to produce such fights. They all want to get huge paycheck, then go on long vacations.
So just expect to see exhibition matches between proven fighter vs low level fighters. For one, they're easier and cheaper to make. The thrill for fans is in seeing the "star" get beat or brutalized by bums.
Those fans "The Mayweather Nuthugging Mafia" like and want Mayweather to be the only one making money. When a "good business decision" comes from someone else(mostly being a non black boxer/person), they criticize them till no end.
Not all Mayweather fans, a very small portion are good boxing fans.