Diego corrales and naseem hamed should be in the ibhof

Gatti getting in opens the debate to alot of fighters now.

Just really think about it man not on an accomplishment level but a person to person level gatti's what boxings all about I can give you a bunch of cheesy things like he's a warrior which is true or he's a true throwback fighter or some bull**** but that's not what it is at least not all of it. he's a legend in his own right and a people's champion and for as bad as he is made to to be skill wise and talent wise he managed get pretty far and to captivate people and bring spotlight to frankly a ****ty sport where heart and will don't triumph anymore only pay days and ppv numbers that wasn't gatti he was a guy who didn't give a **** about any of that he just wanted to fight win or lose he always gave it his all and reminded everybody what fighters used to be like and was loved for it. He was the meaning of a true fighter, gatti the fighter might not be hall of fame worthy but gatti the man was and that's just how I feel. Like it or not gatti's special. I see your point but Naseem Hamed did similar things for the smaller weight classes. He paved the way for guys his size to make big paydays through his entertainment value and exciting fights. Plus, unlike Gatti, he was a dominant champion and world class fighter with skills. So I don't understand how you can say Gatti gets in but not Hamed.

Hamed, definitely yes. Corrales, no.

Does anyone have footage of the Corrales v. Casamayor II fight? NVM, I found it. The commentator thought Casamayor won clearly (118-111) and got robbed. I'll watch the entire fight and draw my own conclusion.

There's better ppl than him not in and there's worse ppl than him who are in. Should hecnaje it? Probably not.

Just really think about it man not on an accomplishment level but a person to person level gatti's what boxings all about I can give you a bunch of cheesy things like he's a warrior which is true or he's a true throwback fighter or some bull**** but that's not what it is at least not all of it. he's a legend in his own right and a people's champion and for as bad as he is made to to be skill wise and talent wise he managed get pretty far and to captivate people and bring spotlight to frankly a ****ty sport where heart and will don't triumph anymore only pay days and ppv numbers that wasn't gatti he was a guy who didn't give a **** about any of that he just wanted to fight win or lose he always gave it his all and reminded everybody what fighters used to be like and was loved for it. He was the meaning of a true fighter, gatti the fighter might not be hall of fame worthy but gatti the man was and that's just how I feel. Like it or not gatti's special. I get your point...but with what you said applies to chico...he didn't give a **** but had more talent and beat better fighters...he was like a better skilled and talented gatti...gatti came back and beat guys the likes of ruelas and Rodriquez ....Casamayor and Castillo wins for chico trump those. Chico was cut from the same clothe but simply was better and accomplished things Gatti didn't

Why would Gatti be in there and not Chico or Naz? Just really think about it man not on an accomplishment level but a person to person level gatti's what boxings all about I can give you a bunch of cheesy things like he's a warrior which is true or he's a true throwback fighter or some bull**** but that's not what it is at least not all of it. he's a legend in his own right and a people's champion and for as bad as he is made to to be skill wise and talent wise he managed get pretty far and to captivate people and bring spotlight to frankly a ****ty sport where heart and will don't triumph anymore only pay days and ppv numbers that wasn't gatti he was a guy who didn't give a **** about any of that he just wanted to fight win or lose he always gave it his all and reminded everybody what fighters used to be like and was loved for it. He was the meaning of a true fighter, gatti the fighter might not be hall of fame worthy but gatti the man was and that's just how I feel. Like it or not gatti's special.

I don't see why they would'nt. Unless the fighters they would be going up against deserve it more.

Gatti got in, why not Robert Guerrero? Baldomir beat Gatti, he should get in too. :boxing: That are eligible... My point is very few deserve a hof spot who fought the past 20 years before them...Gatti was a current example...IMO they deserve it more than McGuigan, Rodolfo Gonzalez, Ken Buchanan, graziano, Edwin Rosario, and a few others in the past

Mayweather Casamayor Castillo Corrales For me Mayweather beat 2/3 Castillo...beat casamayor and corrales, held Mayweather to a disputed Dec Corrales...beat casamayor at their best, beat Castillo, and freitas Casamayor...beat Diego once prime and once past it after the Castillo fights, lost to freitas(disputed) and corrales at their best

This is the problem: now Gatti is in you can make a case for just about everyone. Gatti got in, why not Robert Guerrero? Baldomir beat Gatti, he should get in too. :boxing:

Gatti got in and he did far This is the problem: now Gatti is in you can make a case for just about everyone.

Hamed and corrales were just as exciting as gatti were more accomplished, better resumes, and just plain better fighters....Hamed was the best his his era at 126 and corrales is no lower than number 3 in his era at 130 and 135....no fight gatti won compared to the level drama, skills and stakes of corrales vs Castillo one....corrales would have tore gatti a new arse hole if they fought at their best definitely a tko Mayweather Casamayor Castillo Corrales

Why would Gatti be in there and not Chico or Naz? On the basis of his career achievements and ability, Gatti shouldn't have been able to make the cut by a country mile, but he did take part in 4 fights of the year (1997, 1998, 2002, and 2003) and was involved in fights with some well known stars like Mayweather and DLH. I wouldn't have let him in if it was up to me but I like to think that was their rationale.

No max shouldn't get in and yes gatti belongs there and no Chico shouldn't be either but he has more if a right then naz Hamed and corrales were just as exciting as gatti were more accomplished, better resumes, and just plain better fighters....Hamed was the best his his era at 126 and corrales is no lower than number 3 in his era at 130 and 135....no fight gatti won compared to the level drama, skills and stakes of corrales vs Castillo one....corrales would have tore gatti a new arse hole if they fought at their best definitely a tko

No max shouldn't get in and yes gatti belongs there and no Chico shouldn't be either but he has more if a right then naz Why would Gatti be in there and not Chico or Naz?

No max shouldn't get in and yes gatti belongs there and no Chico shouldn't be either but he has more if a right then naz

Guys who will get in Cotto Paulie Sergio And bradley. Mark my words Pauli,,, hell no Cotto, serg and Bradley are all getting in,, I would also add Ward Froch

Guys who will get in Cotto Paulie Sergio And bradley. Mark my words

Prince to me is a lock,,, he was the man at feather in the 90s Corrales didn't have great skills but he made enough memories to get in,, he is very borderline I would vote for both