Who's Floyd's best win?

The rematch win deserves so much more respect than its getting. An immediate rematch against a guy many think beat him, and Floyd left no doubt. Castillo was a damn good fighter, too. It's certainly better IMO than Hatton or Mosley or Oscar or Alvarez or any of these other wins that "Money" picked up. Mhmm... I voted Marquez (mostly to vote on a guy I knew nobody or very few would pick --- but jmm is in fact one of floyd's best wins, especially in retrospect) but Castillo II should definitely have had more votes and recognition in general.

Surprised nobody voted for Castillo. Since Castillo actually won their first fight. The rematch win deserves so much more respect than its getting. An immediate rematch against a guy many think beat him, and Floyd left no doubt. Castillo was a damn good fighter, too. It's certainly better IMO than Hatton or Mosley or Oscar or Alvarez or any of these other wins that "Money" picked up.

:lol1: the funny thing is, fraud jr greatest win ever is over castillo I and the hilarious thing about it is... castillo got robbed! :lol1: floydiot: he the best doe. :rofl:

A lot of heat with regards to Marquez here. Given Floyd's inactivity prior I thought it was an excellent performance against a future hall of famer. This is one of the rare occassions where I'm going to have to disagree with you, Weltschmerz. When a fighter cheats his opponent on the scales his win is diminished. When you cheat someone on the scales you make your opponent fight under conditions he did not agree to.

Surprised nobody voted for Castillo. Since Castillo actually won their first fight.

Beating a Prime Corrales is 10 times better than beating a past his prime coming off a KO Loss Manny. Yes you fucking idiot, that's exactly what I'm saying. Corrales wasnt as good as you tell himself he was, but you're right about Manny being way past his sell by date....And yet still he isnt quite ripe enough for Floyd.:lol1:

A win over Manny Pacquiao now is completely tainted, he should of fought him earlier on (3yrs ago) and stopped making excuses. It's impact is diminished, however it would still be Floyd's most prized victory on his resume and one that would define his legacy and legitimize him without a shadow of a doubt.

No it's not, Manny's a good win. Nothing more nothing less. Always has been, always will be. Pacquiao is better than Corrales.

No it's not, Manny's a good win. Nothing more nothing less. Always has been, always will be. A win over Manny Pacquiao now is completely tainted, he should of fought him earlier on (3yrs ago) and stopped making excuses.

De La Hoya because he was lucky to pull of that win and maybe Castillo because Castillo was hussling and bullying little Fraud Jr the entire first fight before Fraud realised he needs to use Xylocaine to win.

No it's not, Manny's a good win. Nothing more nothing less. Always has been, always will be. So you're rating Corrales over Pac as a fighter.:rofl::rofl::rofl:

So you acknoledge that JMM was a slow-a$s fighter in the 4th fight and still beat Pac ? Thanks son What are you thanking me for? It was a fact.:thinking:

Corrales at the moment. However if Floyd beats a past his prime Pacquiao, that would still be better than Corrales.

I was talking about the third fight, you greasy bumsniffing little floydgimp. So you acknoledge that JMM was a slow-a$s fighter in the 4th fight and still beat Pac ? Thanks son

No he wasnt better in that fight. Marquez was slow as hell in his fight against Pac at welter. There is no way in hell JMMM would have landed one punch on floyd with all that muscle. Pac stupidly ran into a muscle-loaded punch and his stupidity cost him the fight. Red K me now I was talking about the third fight, you greasy bumsniffing little floydgimp.

He was better than when he fought Floyd, that was apparent to anyone that has two working eyes....or at least ones that arent blocked by the presence of Floyd's testicles. Add in the fact that both guys were nearer to 140 than 147, and its clear to see that you have descended even further into the murky depths of your overwhelming fanboyism and bumsniffery.:sad: No he wasnt better in that fight. Marquez was slow as hell in his fight against Pac at welter. There is no way in hell JMMM would have landed one punch on floyd with all that muscle. Pac stupidly ran into a muscle-loaded punch and his stupidity cost him the fight. Red K me now

Hernandez or Corralles. The Marquez win is underrated. He rolled out of bed after 2 years and shut out the P4P NUmber 2.

Corrales Hatton Castillo Oscar Canelo

Answer this question; was Marquez good at the weight and adjusted when Manny brought him up for their 3rd fight, yes or no? He was better than when he fought Floyd, that was apparent to anyone that has two working eyes....or at least ones that arent blocked by the presence of Floyd's testicles. Add in the fact that both guys were nearer to 140 than 147, and its clear to see that you have descended even further into the murky depths of your overwhelming fanboyism and bumsniffery.:sad:

A lot of heat with regards to Marquez here. Given Floyd's inactivity prior I thought it was an excellent performance against a future hall of famer.