After beating russian Shafikov and making his 6th succesful title defense, this is what El Titere or his new nickname "El Torero" Vazquez said about his role model Money May
"I think there will always be critics, there are those who like the way I fight , there are those who do not , but it's all part of "
" Mayweather is my role model , but I know that I'm still not on that level, I will love to fight like a professor, like Floyd Mayweather ,"
"I hope the best fights and unification , I just hope I do not fight against southpaws, this was the fourth consecutive southpaw".
http://espndeportes.espn.go.com/news/story?id=2028581&s=box&type=story
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-U9rjo60I9v8/T5iBxMjuBKI/AAAAAAAABL8/4ZAq-cH1jE0/s1600/DANIEL+LUQUE+SEVILLA+2012+1.jpg
http://www.periodicoenfoque.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Miguel-el-titere-vazquez.jpg
Broner did lowball Vasquez he said this in a interview to the point his promoter was not going to get anything it was a deliberate lowball offer to kill the fight. just because Vasquez was not the A side does not mean he has to fight for a dollar while Broner fights for 1 million .His offer was not within reason .Instead Broner fought bums to save his O as that dumb ass calls it
I understand what your trying to say but how much did Vasquez get paid before and after? If it's less, then he wasn't lowballed, he just overestimated his worth. I like Vazquez, but he's more Hopkins/Vlad than Floyd/Rigo.
Out of all the boxer or spoilers as the haters would say (Floyd, Rigo, Moreno, MGarcia, TCrawford, Abril, Vazquez, Marquez, Molina, Lara, Ward, Hopkins, Dirrell, Klit bros.) The only one I truly dislike is Molina. As long as they're not holding constantly I don't complain.
he didnt low ball him at all as far as i know, what are you basing that on? are you just assuming it because you dislike broner and want him to have low balled vasquez?
because you have to keep in mind how little vasquez brings to the table. vasquez has no name and a very limited fan base, broner would carry the event and he should be paid accordingly. the money you bring to the table is the money you take from the table.
sure vasquez wouldnt earn as much as broner but it would be an opportunity to take his career to a whole new level and make a name for himself. vasquez wont earn a lot with anyone until he does. obviously theres a risk he losses badly and gains very little if anything all in all, but almost every fighter with vasquez' style have to take that risk at some point if they want to become stars.
Broner did lowball Vasquez he said this in a interview to the point his promoter was not going to get anything it was a deliberate lowball offer to kill the fight. just because Vasquez was not the A side does not mean he has to fight for a dollar while Broner fights for 1 million .His offer was not within reason .Instead Broner fought bums to save his O as that dumb ass calls it
Seeing a lot I'd say majority was picking Shafikov I hope Vasquez gets some well deserved credit.
He has no real pop, hes not pretty too watch but the guy is one of the finest pure boxers in the sport today. I believe he is Cuban schooled and it shows.
Very intelligent fighter with a very high ring I.Q
He trained at the Vlad school of boxing for this fight
Seeing a lot I'd say majority was picking Shafikov I hope Vasquez gets some well deserved credit.
He has no real pop, hes not pretty too watch but the guy is one of the finest pure boxers in the sport today. I believe he is Cuban schooled and it shows.
Very intelligent fighter with a very high ring I.Q
of course he would when you offer peanuts that is one of many ways some fighter duck others THEY LOW BALL THEM TO THE POINT NOBODY IN THERE TEAM MAKES ANY MONEY
he didnt low ball him at all as far as i know, what are you basing that on? are you just assuming it because you dislike broner and want him to have low balled vasquez?
because you have to keep in mind how little vasquez brings to the table. vasquez has no name and a very limited fan base, broner would carry the event and he should be paid accordingly. the money you bring to the table is the money you take from the table.
sure vasquez wouldnt earn as much as broner but it would be an opportunity to take his career to a whole new level and make a name for himself. vasquez wont earn a lot with anyone until he does. obviously theres a risk he losses badly and gains very little if anything all in all, but almost every fighter with vasquez' style have to take that risk at some point if they want to become stars.
one of the reasons Vasquez didn't fight Broner was because of his lowball offer nobody was going to make any money in Vasquez team .
Im sure they made much more money sitting for 14 months rather than fight broner
thats because its all in your imagination. he can certainly be criticized in many ways but broner tried to fight all the top guys at 135, thats a fact. burns blatantly ducked him and vasquez turned him down as well, in his case it was over money i think. no clue if it was justified or not.
one of the reasons Vasquez didn't fight Broner was because of his lowball offer nobody was going to make any money in Vasquez team .
Vazquez criminally underrated. People always seem to ignore that Broner ducked him at 135 :boxing:
thats because its all in your imagination. he can certainly be criticized in many ways but broner tried to fight all the top guys at 135, thats a fact. burns blatantly ducked him and vasquez turned him down as well.
Always enjoyed watching Vazquez and what I like most about him is that he doesn't spoil at all. I didn't watch his last fight, I will in a bit.
If u wanna remain a fan, dont watch it
False. Vasquez denied broners offer
of course he would when you offer peanuts that is one of many ways some fighter duck others THEY LOW BALL THEM TO THE POINT NOBODY IN THERE TEAM MAKES ANY MONEY
He also lied about being sick and pulled out of the Burns fight.
Miguel Vazquez propably just did not to fall victim to the UK judges like Raymundo Beltran eventually would.