Let's face it, Khan would absolutely tear broner apart, although Broner has ok speed etc, he's too flat footed, khan would be darting in an out ripping him apart. Also khan has beat maidana and not forgetting knocked him down.
It makes more sense for khan to fight mayweather because fighters with speed such as Judah cause problems for Floyd and we always see punchers fight Floyd an what happens? They get picked apart, so it would be nice for someone with speed to challenge Floyd since all we see is bigger guys who can supposedly punch.
I think Broner is more glass chinned than khan tbh that's why he faught feather fisted paulie, no disrespect to paulie but khan blitzed malignaggi in way more convincing fashion than Broner.
Maidana isn't even a massive puncher so there's no chance in him being able to knock Floyd out with one shot. You seen how Floyd death with when Mosley hurt him, came back an destroyed him.
Khan v mayweather for May. Don't let your hate for khan get in the way
Khan has fast hands..but thats it...
1-he is not accurate
2-his footwork is sloppy
3-he fights dumb
4-he is not durable
5-he keeps his hands low and trys to hard to be something he is not
I agree. Khan is fast on his feet and with his hands but just fast, not superfast like Pacquiao, Gamboa or Mayweather. His footwork is sloppy and he does fight dumb. If he was the superfast highly skilled boxer his fans say he is he would have won every round in his last fight with journeyman Diaz instead of winning by only a point or two in England.
Broner is about three times as good as Diaz and Khan didn't tear Diaz apart. In fact he just barely won. Maidana had a chance to fight for the Wba world welterweight title and he took it and he won. Khan had a chance to fight Alexander for a world welterweight title and he chickened out. In boxing you get credit for what you actually do in the ring not for what some of your fans think you can do. I don't agree than Khan would destroy Broner. Khan has a very weak chin at whatever weight he fights at. Broner has two handed power and good hand speed and accuracy. Broner has only one loss and has never been stopped. Khan has 3 losses and been stopped twice. I think Khan-Broner is an even fight.
broner TKOs khan, he is very accurate and pretty fast too, he will time khan and land big with the straight right hand.
It's hard to tell now.
the khan of old would have zero problems with Broner. he's too flat footed.
Broners output would lead to his downfall. Khan would just move in and out as always and his hand speed would allow him to land punches more consistently. It all depends on Adrien counter punching ability and if he has a punch to disorientate Khan in his attack.
Khan has fast hands..but thats it...
1-he is not accurate
2-his footwork is sloppy
3-he fights dumb
4-he is not durable
5-he keeps his hands low and trys to hard to be something he is not
There is only question that matters.
Is Khan finished? Out of prime? Fighting with a style that doesn't suit his aging bigger body which his problems are compounded by Virgil trying to make him fight 'smart' when he can't?
He looked the worst I've ever seen him against Julio Diaz.
Mayweather >KO 5 then yes...
If he can survive Mayweather for 12 rounds and look decent in some rounds then he may have a short future and the fight 'worthiness' breaks even.