Who will you blame if Froch-Groves II doesn't happen?

I know that, and what i'm saying is that he can't fight Froch and become a millionaire under the current circumstances. Because if he only gets 15% he is lucky to get 750k assuming the fight is worth 5mil which i'm doubting as well. Is there a difference? Hmmm... I wouldn't have known. :lol1: :blowjob::blowjob::blowjob:

Groves cried for rematch with IBF. He got it Rules state he gets 15% He should get 15% and not a penny more weather he deserve it or not, and if he doesn't like it then boofukinhoo!!!!!! plus his attempt to get the fight ruled a no contest is a complete joke.

Unless Froch drops his IBF title and walks away, i'd say Groves. Groves wanted a rematch and was granted it. All he has to do is agree with the split.

The fight only doesn't happen if Groves thinks he's too big a name to take his 15%. The ball is squarely in his court now - how much does he want that title? The offer's on the table - if Groves doesn't want it, there's no one else to blame. agree with this

Froch's fault. He should be hungry to get back in with Groves and finish the job. All these fans are unsatisfied and he's looking the other way.

No there's no options now because Groves has been instated as the mandatory. There's also a difference between George Groves and Manny Pacquaio but you probably don't see that with your ginger tinted spectacles on. I know that, and what i'm saying is that he can't fight Froch and become a millionaire under the current circumstances. Because if he only gets 15% he is lucky to get 750k assuming the fight is worth 5mil which i'm doubting as well. Is there a difference? Hmmm... I wouldn't have known.

Yes he has, but that offer was obviously including a few options, a rematch etc. And still only 20% of the cut. Now, we both know it wasn't rejected because of the amount involved, but because Groves didn't want to be tied to matchroom. But he can't fight Froch and become a millionaire. 15% of 5m is 750k right? And you might see it as double standards, but to me there's a difference between 40 million and 750k. No there's no options now because Groves has been instated as the mandatory. There's also a difference between George Groves and Manny Pacquaio but you probably don't see that with your ginger tinted spectacles on.

Hearn has offered him more as he doesn't want the fight to go to purse bids. Groves can fight other guys and get paid fuk all or he can fight Froch and become a millionaire. So why the double standard? Yes he has, but that offer was obviously including a few options, a rematch etc. And still only 20% of the cut. Now, we both know it wasn't rejected because of the amount involved, but because Groves didn't want to be tied to matchroom. But he can't fight Froch and become a millionaire. 15% of 5m is 750k right? And you might see it as double standards, but to me there's a difference between 40 million and 750k.

You can't put it that way. It didn't go to purse bids last time - he was offered a fixed sum of money. The purses doesn't work that way - he's not just given "15%". I'm not saying it's impressive. I'm saying, what else is he going to do? He can fight a lot of guys and get 20-25 million, but he can't fight anyone other than mayweather and make 40. You're so corny and predictable. Hearn has offered him more as he doesn't want the fight to go to purse bids. Groves can fight other guys and get paid fuk all or he can fight Froch and become a millionaire. So why the double standard?

The rematch is worth more so 15% will be more than what he made the first time. He's been offered more than that though anyway. He can't get this kind of money anywhere else. And 40m plus no PPV is not impressive for the biggest fight of ALL TIME :pat: We know you have different rules for Gayemaker fighters though. You can't put it that way. It didn't go to purse bids last time - he was offered a fixed sum of money. The purses doesn't work that way - he's not just given "15%". I'm not saying it's impressive. I'm saying, what else is he going to do? He can fight a lot of guys and get 20-25 million, but he can't fight anyone other than mayweather and make 40. You're so corny and predictable.

No, he was being offered his highest ever purse - if he only gets 15% it will be on par with what he made in the first fight. Not impressive for the biggest fight of the year in the UK. I said Pacquiao's value has since diminished and he can't get 40 millions against anyone else, so he should take that. The rematch is worth more so 15% will be more than what he made the first time. He's been offered more than that though anyway. He can't get this kind of money anywhere else. And 40m plus no PPV is not impressive for the biggest fight of ALL TIME :pat: We know you have different rules for Gayemaker fighters though.

He's being offered his highest ever purse and it's much more than what he'd make in any other fight. So how is it any different? Also George Groves isn't Pacquaio...LOL. What was it you said? "Win and negotiate the rematch" :lol1: No, he was being offered his highest ever purse - if he only gets 15% it will be on par with what he made in the first fight. Not impressive for the biggest fight of the year in the UK. I said Pacquiao's value has since diminished and he can't get 40 millions against anyone else, so he should take that.

at the mo its herns fault with all his many stipulations Hearn is offering him more than 15% with no options. There can't be options because Groves is the mandatory now.

if froch drops his title who else is there to blame at the mo its herns fault with all his many stipulations

Groves. He had a 25% offer and turned it down, now he is whining that he gets 15%.

I'm not sure it would be PPV in the UK at all - in fact, i'm sure Hearn said it was hard to make because of the time difference etc and it hasn't proved massive success over the years. Aha taking things out of context. Except for the fact that Groves isn't being offered $40 million dollars up front. He's being offered his highest ever purse and it's much more than what he'd make in any other fight. So how is it any different? Also George Groves isn't Pacquaio...LOL. What was it you said? "Win and negotiate the rematch" :lol1:

Kessler wants a fight... he can probably give more money than Froch is offering with the purse percentages. What he can do is fight Kessler and see if Froch vacates or not

Chavez fight would be on PPV both here and in America. He will make a significant amount of money. This is the guy who said Pacquaio should take 0% of the PPV against Mayweather and then negotiate the rematch....LOL why doesn't Groves just do the same? I'm not sure it would be PPV in the UK at all - in fact, i'm sure Hearn said it was hard to make because of the time difference etc and it hasn't proved massive success over the years. Aha taking things out of context. Except for the fact that Groves isn't being offered $40 million dollars up front.

So the fight more than doubled in value because of Froch? :rofl: Froch is a UK fighter, if you think he's taking the lions share of HBO PPV, then you'd be wrong. He'll by far make the most out of fighting on Sky PPV and taking his fair share of that, than fighting on someone elses network - which is what he'd be doing. Chavez fight would be on PPV both here and in America. He will make a significant amount of money. This is the guy who said Pacquaio should take 0% of the PPV against Mayweather and then negotiate the rematch....LOL why doesn't Groves just do the same?

Let's see..... Has Groves refused to rematch two fighters whom he'd recorded Wins over before? Has he turned down a Seven-Figure Sum to face Froch? Is he continually whining about this and that? Yes, that's Groves. Froch wants this fight, but he can also chase Bigger Money fights. Forget Simpletons Like Frankie Bruno and D4 - they are Trolling. I'm interested in hearing more about these bigger money fights..?