Whos your #10 P4P

But that's not what p4p is. Lol. Smh. The definition varies, some compile them on resume, some on head to head if they were all the same size, some use other references. The only thing that's consistent is that they're personal lists with personal preferences.

Froch is in Ring's top 10, TBR's top 10, boxingscene's top 10 etc, but more importantly for the sport he avoids no one and wins far more than he loses. I don't like giving fighter's credit who avoid certain fighters over those who don't. Everyone can have a top record picking and choosing opponents to suit them while avoiding those who would trouble them. I made my criteria clear: But that's not what p4p is. Lol. Smh.

1. Jon Jones 2. Jose Aldo 3. Chris Weidman 4. Cain Velasquez 5. Demetrious Johnson 6. Anderson Silva 7. Renan Barao 8. Dominick Cruz 9. Anthony Pettis 10. JDS

Some of these p4p lists are comical and show you that MPDNSAB. Feel free to decipher the initials. Weebler - I'm disappointed. For a HOF poster having Floyd at number 7. Tut tut mate. And froch's last fight - lol. Chin up in the air, crossing his feet. In top 10? Come on folks. I admit He woulda knocked Georgie boy out anyway ref jumping in early or not. When you make these lists, ask yourself, has this guy beaten the other top guy in his division. If he hasn't for reasons other than not fighting because of promotional conflict, then don't put him in the list. Froch is in Ring's top 10, TBR's top 10, boxingscene's top 10 etc, but more importantly for the sport he avoids no one and wins far more than he loses. I don't like giving fighter's credit who avoid certain fighters over those who don't. Everyone can have a top record picking and choosing opponents to suit them while avoiding those who would trouble them. I made my criteria clear: Willingness to take on the best consistently ranks highly on my PFP list, you're not a true PFP champ if you're avoiding opponents and/or cherry-picking. You can't just say I want him and him but not him, just to make yourself look good and protect your record.

1. Mayweather 2. Ward 3. Bradley 4. Rigo 5. Martinez 6. JMM 7. Pacquiao 8. Klitschko 9. Danny Garcia 10. Carl Froch

Tell it to this guy..:alcoholic You guys gave to much about the OFFICIAL (official:3 self-interested humans) decisions. Everyone agrees that Pac beat Bradley. Martinez declined a lot in his last fight. He could have lost that fight but the judges saved him. (dont say it was a robbery, but it could have gone either way) And Murray is nothing special...

How Pacquiao who lost 2 out of his last 3 fights, above the P4P LINEAL Middleweight Champion of the world, Sergio Martinez, is unknown to me. + when he comes back he fights a easy fight, Sergio hasn't had the most popular competition, but it all has been stiff competition. 1. Floyd Maywether 2. Andre Ward 3. Guillermo Rigondeaux 4. Tim Bradley 5. Manny Pacquiao 6. Danny Garcia 7. Juan Manuel Marquez 8. Mikey Garcia 9. Sergio Martinez 10. Roman Gonzalez Tell it to this guy..:alcoholic

neither fan of Bradley or Pac. that about the butthurt but to say Bradley beat Pac is very ignorant and shows the conformity with bull**** decisions. that's sad Sure your not a fan of either..Your just an alt who can come on here and say whatever..I get it..Me I stand by what I believe,which is Bradley beat Pac..Even tho that has nothing to do with my first post..Bottom line is Bradley did beat both Marquez and Pac..Let's say you wanna say Pac beat Bradley..It does not change the fact that Pac was stopped(Stopped!!!!)he has no business on a top ten list period..Again,you've missed the point responding to something so stupid(and if you were not butt hurt why bother)..You've missed the main point again..Oh but sure your not a fan of anyone,your completely un-bias :buttkick:..Sure..

1. Floyd Maywether 2. Andre Ward 3. Guillermo Rigondeaux 4. Tim Bradley 5. Manny Pacquiao 6. Danny Garcia 7. Juan Manuel Marquez 8. Mikey Garcia 9. Sergio Martinez 10. Roman Gonzalez

Rigo should not be in the top 10.... GGG should take his spot imo. 1. Floyd 2. Ward 3. Wlad 4. D. Garcia 5. M. Pacquiao 6. M. Garcia 7. GGG 8. Bradley 9. Canelo 10. Froch lol thats a funny joke

Obviously you've missed the point..Must be your butt hurt blocking you vision.. Oh and BTW I like Pac as well as Bradley.. neither fan of Bradley or Pac. that about the butthurt but to say Bradley beat Pac is very ignorant and shows the conformity with bull**** decisions. that's sad

I suppose you are a very biased Bradley-Fan, if you think he beat Pac. :usa2: Obviously you've missed the point..Must be your butt hurt blocking you vision.. Oh and BTW I like Pac as well as Bradley..

Bradley Marquez Pac..That should be your order.. Pac beating the top 10 in the div is not a lock..Hell he loss to two of the top 10 already dude.. I suppose you are a very biased Bradley-Fan, if you think he beat Pac. :usa2:

Rigo beat the best guy in his division this year In donaire. He would be fav to beat all the guys around his division such as abner or Jhonny but we won't get to see it because of promoters. Ward has cleaned out his division. Rodriguez was one of the best 168 pounders he hadn't already beat yet. It's a combo of all 3 criteria with excitement being least important.. Ok so JMM beat PAC but PAC beat Bradley in most people eyes but Bradley beat JMM. So how do you want me to order these 3? The way I do it is to ask myself which of the 3 beats the top 10 in their division the most and it's PAC. Bradley Marquez Pac..That should be your order.. Pac beating the top 10 in the div is not a lock..Hell he loss to two of the top 10 already dude..

Rigo beat the best guy in his division this year In donaire. He would be fav to beat all the guys around his division such as abner or Jhonny but we won't get to see it because of promoters. Ward has cleaned out his division. Rodriguez was one of the best 168 pounders he hadn't already beat yet. It's a combo of all 3 criteria with excitement being least important.. Ok so JMM beat PAC but PAC beat Bradley in most people eyes but Bradley beat JMM. So how do you want me to order these 3? The way I do it is to ask myself which of the 3 beats the top 10 in their division the most and it's PAC. Pacman beats most of the top 10 in his division?? Are you sure? He's beaten 1 prime welterweight in his entire run there (and needed a catchweight to do it). Well he beat Clottey too. Don't even know if he even had a prime honestly. Right now Bradley should be ranked higher than Marquez who ranks higher than Pacman. He's the youngest, freshest and has more of an elite hof career left.

Thank you for the shout out appreciate it. But on point, if recent wins and excitement are your criteria, or 2 of your 3, then realistically Ward and Rigo wouldn't be top 3. Now I myself find both entertaining, but the majority of fans, some strange don't. Furthermore if career accomplishments can keep a fighter in the the current top pfp list, that would make it impossible for the young fighters who demonstrate fabulous talent no room to improve as long as an atg is active correct?? That's not fair. Pacman for instance has done nothing in years to be worthy of top 5 pfp at the end of 2013. All he did was get slept and beat a fighter who was foreign to his division recently. Coincidentally the fighter who ko'd him is not in your op 5. That's certainly unfair to him, no?? Rigo beat the best guy in his division this year In donaire. He would be fav to beat all the guys around his division such as abner or Jhonny but we won't get to see it because of promoters. Ward has cleaned out his division. Rodriguez was one of the best 168 pounders he hadn't already beat yet. It's a combo of all 3 criteria with excitement being least important.. Ok so JMM beat PAC but PAC beat Bradley in most people eyes but Bradley beat JMM. So how do you want me to order these 3? The way I do it is to ask myself which of the 3 beats the top 10 in their division the most and it's PAC.

1. mayweather 2. ward 3. rigondeaux 4. bradley 5. pacquiao 6. w. klitschko 7. j. m. marquez 8. d. garcia 9. m. garcia 10. kovalev

Come on bush baby, your a PAC and Floyd basher. One of the few in this forum. Your not bias. Your just a consistent basher of the 2 :) btw I did pick you as one of the names I chose for poster of the year nominations before poll came out. My list is based off these 3 things in the following order: 1) recent wins against best in division 2) career accomplishments 3) excitement Thank you for the shout out appreciate it. But on point, if recent wins and excitement are your criteria, or 2 of your 3, then realistically Ward and Rigo wouldn't be top 3. Now I myself find both entertaining, but the majority of fans, some strange don't. Furthermore if career accomplishments can keep a fighter in the the current top pfp list, that would make it impossible for the young fighters who demonstrate fabulous talent no room to improve as long as an atg is active correct?? That's not fair. Pacman for instance has done nothing in years to be worthy of top 5 pfp at the end of 2013. All he did was get slept and beat a fighter who was foreign to his division recently. Coincidentally the fighter who ko'd him is not in your op 5. That's certainly unfair to him, no??

Weebs musta still been drunk after New Years.

Willingness to take on the best consistently ranks highly on my PFP list, you're not a true PFP champ if you're ducking opponents and/or cherry-picking. You can't just say I want him and him but not him, just to make yourself look good. HW Champ of the World - Wladimir Klitschko Then the smaller guys... 1. Ward 2. Pacquiao 3. Froch 4. Bradley 5. Lara 6. Rigondeaux 7. Mayweather 8. Marquez 9. Martinez 10. Stevenson WTF dude :lol1: I thought you're one of the smart guys.