He keeps mentioning "1-2! 1-2!" and says that no matter what way people slice it, he lost to bradley.
Now do you really think he means that? Do you think he actually thinks pac lost that robbery, even with his trainer and own father says pac was robbed? Or is Floyd just looking for an excuse not to fight pacquiao?
Pac beat Bradley as convincingly as Floyd beat Canelo, yet didn't get a draw let alone a win. So shows just how badly robbed Pac was.
And to think Floyd is crying because one judge made it a draw with Canelo? Floyd knows Pac beat Bradley.
This is coming from a man who considered cotto undefeated when he faced him. By his logic, Canelo is still undefeated since he didn't fight floyd as his most comfortable weight.
What on earth are you talking? Canelo made 152 at weigh in and was about 168lb on fight night, the same weight he always is, smh. catch weight was for weigh in not the fight. so he did lose at his most comfortable weight.
He did officially lose to bradley. it was a very close fight i actually watched it twice first time had pac winning by a round, second time a draw. larry merchants 10-2 in favour of pac is a disgrace imo
This is coming from a man who considered cotto undefeated when he faced him. He only said that because he was about to fight Cotto. When Pacquiao was about to face Cotto, Floyd told Brian Kenny on ESPN that he felt Cotto lost against Clottey.
This is coming from a man who considered cotto undefeated when he faced him. By his logic, Canelo is still undefeated since he didn't fight floyd as his most comfortable weight.
No way, floyds the other person to feel the wrath of C.J. Ross
But what hes saying is true though , its still officially a loss ON PAPER and title wise ni matter what. Didnt help pac got kod after to asd that hes slipping
It also did not look good that he did not go directly back to fight Bradley imo..There should have been no other option but Bradley at that point..Fighters fight,they don't say I'm cool with Popular opinion..That within it self shows Pac is slipping..
No way, floyds the other person to feel the wrath of C.J. Ross
But what hes saying is true though , its still officially a loss ON PAPER and title wise ni matter what. Didnt help pac got kod after to asd that hes slipping
Because Floyd doesn't want a fight with Pacquiao. I don't even think Floydiots can argue this any longer. It has been roadblock after roadblock after roadblock.
The Mayweathers also said that Manny needs to KO Bradley this time around, as if Floyd could KO Bradley.
LMAO,when you say road block,do you mean Manny losing??
If floyd thinks that, why exactly does manny have to rematch bradley. lol
Because Floyd doesn't want a fight with Pacquiao. I don't even think Floydiots can argue this any longer. It has been roadblock after roadblock after roadblock.
The Mayweathers also said that Manny needs to KO Bradley this time around, as if Floyd could KO Bradley.
If floyd thinks that, why exactly does manny have to rematch bradley. lol
Becuase Bradley holds a win over Pac..That's why he says no matter how ya slice it..Which he's right about btw,no matter how ya slice it Tito beat Hoya Sweet Pea and Chavez fought to a draw,Griffen beat Jones etc etc..It's really not that hard to understand..
He said 'no matter how you slice it' which indicates he knows Pacquiao won. Floyd Senior even thinks Pacquiao beat Bradley.
The only person who thinks Bradley beat Manny is well, Bradley. I'm not even sure Joel Diaz thinks Bradley won.If floyd thinks that, why exactly does manny have to rematch bradley. lol
He said 'no matter how you slice it' which indicates he knows Pacquiao won. Floyd Senior even thinks Pacquiao beat Bradley.
The only person who thinks Bradley beat Manny is well, Bradley. I'm not even sure Joel Diaz thinks Bradley won.