Lmfao at Canelo against Trout being slick. The kid moved his head one time to avoid Trouts feints.
I counted more than one bro..
http://i.minus.com/i6vctAWafxIua.gif
http://i.minus.com/ibbp7gpfJuD6ai.gif
http://i.minus.com/iI0P6hzaGvchx.gif
Ahaha! Broner slick? Thanks for the laugh. 2010 martinez is slick. Pac with rios was slick. Canelo with trout was slick. Willy pep, ali, tyson, slick.
Getting hit on the shoulder doesnt make you slick.
Lmfao at Canelo against Trout being slick. The kid moved his head one time to avoid Trouts feints.
Pac not slick enough to hang wit a slick brotha like Broner.
Ahaha! Broner slick? Thanks for the laugh. 2010 martinez is slick. Pac with rios was slick. Canelo with trout was slick. Willy pep, ali, tyson, slick.
Getting hit on the shoulder doesnt make you slick.
Not even drop rios? How many times has rios been down before? Oh thats right 0.
Broner went life and death with the 'slow' maidana' tasted the canvas twice. Pac would be like maidana in fast forward high speed. 2 rnds.
Rios was hurt constantly by average Alvarado who got beat down by Pacs sparring Partner. Pac should have killed him according to you lol
Take quotes out of context just like ur boy floyd! Clever you! What about the rest if that post?
"Number 1 P4P in the sport" - I said Pacquiao's not the number 1 P4P in the sport. How is that out of context?
Nice to see you back track after being proven wrong, though.
As for the rest of the post. He said "why number 1? Because when you don't fight your mandatory, you lose your spot".
OK, I'm fine with that. Mayweather doesn't fight Pacquiao, he loses the "number 1 p4p in the sport" spot. Pacquiao still doesn't receive said spot.
Anything else?
Nope, no one said that. Not at all.
Looks like I'm not the one that needs to learn to read. Or think.
Take quotes out of context just like ur boy floyd! Clever you! What about the rest if that post?
Thats an overstatement. He would beat him but not in two rounds. He couldn't even drop Rios lol.
Broner has plenty of time to get better.
Not even drop rios? How many times has rios been down before? Oh thats right 0.
Broner went life and death with the 'slow' maidana' tasted the canvas twice. Pac would be like maidana in fast forward high speed. 2 rnds.
No one said p4p except you. Learn to read. Think first.
Floyd needs to man up and face the #1 P4P in the sport, Manny Pacquiao.
Nope, no one said that. Not at all.
Looks like I'm not the one that needs to learn to read. Or think.
Apparently, how things work, are that you can say "P4P #1" and mean "The number 1 welterweight". Which btw, Pacquiao is neither.
And apparently, how things work, are that you can get put on ice in one fight, come back and beat up on Bam Bam the punching bag, and be elevated to number 1.
I think I understand it just fine.
No one said p4p except you. Learn to read. Think first.
We're talking directly about the news that floyd said he will give up his belt to pac without a fight if pac becomes mandatory. Pac will be champ.
Why? Ask floyd. Something about ost or promoters or training outside usa or pretending he takes roids or ppv numbers or 1-2 i dunno anymore.
You dont see like the rest of us that Pac would ko Boner in 2rnds max?
Thats an overstatement. He would beat him but not in two rounds. He couldn't even drop Rios lol.
Broner has plenty of time to get better.
Well, he wouldn't even come close to winning that fight. I do want to see it, though. And being #1 WW, and #1 p4p are entirely different.
And I wouldn't say "no questions asked" considering he just got put to sleep 2 fights ago.
Well.... tell that to Floyd who has ducked the fight for 5 years and counting. You don't want to fight, okay, but you lose your spot.
And I can come up with the argument that Mayweather got rocked by a 39 year old mosley, who ran from Pac the entire fight. Also Pacquiao was destroying Marquez up until that freak punch. Point is, all of those things are irrelevant to the current matchup we're talking about.
You dont see like the rest of us that Pac would ko Boner in 2rnds max?
He'd beat the living hell out of Broner, but he wouldn't KO him in 2 rounds. This mythical power you guys act like he has is hilarious. He'd probably beat Broner into submission rather easily, though.
Pacman should fight Broner. That way Pacman fans and triangle theorist can concuct some delusion that in beating Broner, Pacman actually beat Floyd.
But Pacman is not the 2nd best welterweight. He lost 2 fights to the welterweight version of Marquez and barely beat a crippled Bradley. Ohh and last but not least, Rios was not a welterweight.
I think you have a serious misunderstanding about how things work...
Apparently, how things work, are that you can say "P4P #1" and mean "The number 1 welterweight". Which btw, Pacquiao is neither.
And apparently, how things work, are that you can get put on ice in one fight, come back and beat up on Bam Bam the punching bag, and be elevated to number 1.
I think I understand it just fine.
Well, he wouldn't even come close to winning that fight. I do want to see it, though. And being #1 WW, and #1 p4p are entirely different.
And I wouldn't say "no questions asked" considering he just got put to sleep 2 fights ago.
I think you have a serious misunderstanding about how things work...
I think he means in weight division numbnuts. How could pac be Wards mandatory? In case u havent heard ur boy floyd is happy just to give the belt to pac without a fight, conceding that pac is champ, hows that for tight logic?
I hope it does happen. I would love to see it. And then watch you guys all cry about how Pacquiao is too far gone to have been competitive. Because competitive, it won't be.
12y ago
Pac should fight Broner... | BoxingScene Community