Amir khan's stock has rose these last 2 weeks

I think its obvious that that's what he wrote sure, but obviously this thread was made to imply that Khan is better than he is. Are you saying you dont see the implication given by this thread? Whatever the implication it's still not a triangle theory that the OP was referring to.

Devon Alexander did a lot better than Khan against Maidana, are we going to have a thread about Alexander's stock as well?

Khan has too many haters who dislike him for non-boxing reasons, esp on here. Khan has some good wins, esp the MM win, and is a good fight for any of these guys. I recall the talk of MM was going to kill AK, AK is avoiding him blah blah - when that didnt manifest, folks did everything but give Khan his props. He is not hated for non-boxing reasons. AK talks about himself like he is a great fighter and those knockouts that he has suffered has hurt his stock.

I don't think anyone is claiming triangle theory here, the people that are insinuating this are the ones who can't comprehend the OP post/thread. He claimed Khan wins against some of these guys looks better now. Why? Because those guys have gone on to do better with their respective careers. The OP is not claiming that because Khan beats Maidana then Khan>>>> Broner nope. The level of uneducated posters on here is really scary, or there must be something about Mayweather that makes some of these posters sound uneducated. I think its obvious that that's what he wrote sure, but obviously this thread was made to imply that Khan is better than he is. Are you saying you dont see the implication given by this thread?

Alexander beat Maidana worse than Khan did, so does this mean that Alexander is clearly better than Khan? Khan has fought no-one really of note since Maidana. A rematch would be fair to see if Khan is still as capable as he once was against a newly refreshed Maidana. I don't think anyone is claiming triangle theory here, the people that are insinuating this are the ones who can't comprehend the OP post/thread. He claimed Khan wins against some of these guys looks better now. Why? Because those guys have gone on to do better with their respective careers. The OP is not claiming that because Khan beats Maidana then Khan>>>> Broner nope. The level of uneducated posters on here is really scary, or there must be something about Mayweather that makes some of these posters sound uneducated.

Alexander beat Maidana worse than Khan did, so does this mean that Alexander is clearly better than Khan? Khan has fought no-one really of note since Maidana. A rematch would be fair to see if Khan is still as capable as he once was against a newly refreshed Maidana. Khan has fought very good fighters throughout his career,but at current moment he has too fight his way back to a certain position in this sport..Fight a Brook or a Porter to get your self in position..I mean Khan has done nothing as of late to get that(Mayweather)fight..

Alexander beat Maidana worse than Khan did, so does this mean that Alexander is clearly better than Khan? Khan has fought no-one really of note since Maidana. A rematch would be fair to see if Khan is still as capable as he once was against a newly refreshed Maidana.

Khan/Maidanna 2!!

Why do you never respond to the actual post itself, and instead, ask another question which is completely unrelated to what I posted? Cause your post is detracting from fighters who are on a winning streak..For a fighter who has loss back to back fights,and has yet to have a meaningful win..

Has Khan even had aWW win yet?? Has Khan even had a meaningful win in the past two yrs?? Well he did survive the mighty Diaz above 140, albeit barely.

Avoiding the actual context of posts, bushbaby classic. Yup, the mighty Brandeis Prescott, world killer, lol!!:boxing:

Who has Thurman beat? Soto Karass, Zaveck and Aydin? Maidana? Broner, soto Karass, Lopez and a loss to Devon. Guerrero? Berto and Aydin. The best win on that list is Maidana over broner. Thurman wins are average bro, it's nothing more then that. Guerrero's run was lol worthy. It seems the flavours of the month get picked for a floyd fight and they all play out the same way. It's like recording the fights and every PPV floyd has you put your recording on repeat. Has Khan even had aWW win yet?? Has Khan even had a meaningful win in the past two yrs??

I wasn't saying if your hot or cold, I said you sounded more frustrated then the other dude and you did. Avoiding the posts that concern you I see.

Seems as though you're the one who's getting frustrated. Not I. I'm just getting warmed up. You've decided to answer the wrong post though.

Sorry kid. I get it, you're not beneath a bum. Some of us consider ourselves better than a bum, no matter what imaginary 'terms' you add to it. Have a good day, I'm out! You need to leave son. Go on, bye. Starts telling lies, then runs away. Peace.:bukkake:

Do not Jeez me son. You're the one that's claimed imaginary $h!t. Do not get frustrated now. Show me where and when I said Khan was beneath me. The thing about sentences is you can't take a word or 2 and derive your own meaning. In boxing terms, means exactly that. it doesn't mean someone is beneath you. Sorry kid. I get it, you're not beneath a bum. Some of us consider ourselves better than a bum, no matter what imaginary 'terms' you add to it. Have a good day, I'm out!

Wow why don't you try reading the highlighted post you said in my full comment. Because that's where you said it! Jeez. :buttkick: I think being a bum in any terms is pretty shitty, I'm a teacher and being a bum in teaching terms still would make me a fucking bum! Do not Jeez me son. You're the one that's claimed imaginary $h!t. Do not get frustrated now. Show me where and when I said Khan was beneath me. The thing about sentences is you can't take a word or 2 and derive your own meaning. In boxing terms, means exactly that. it doesn't mean someone is beneath you.

Come on man beating a string of C grade fighters is not good enough to get you a floyd fight. Truth be told, the most deserving opponents for floyd (PAC and brad) are over at TR. That's the truth. See your not being fair..Some could say the same about Khan and who he beat..The truth is you can only beat who's in front of you,which Thurman and Maidana and Lara have done..In impressive fashion as well..I can not say the same for Khan tbh..It's just being fair bro..

So again who and where did anyone claim Khan was beneath them. Or at least tell me in which part of the world does khan is a bum in boxing terms actually mean (said fighter is beneath me). Thanks in advance. Wow why don't you try reading the highlighted post you said in my full comment. Because that's where you said it! Jeez. :buttkick: I think being a bum in any terms is pretty shitty, I'm a teacher and being a bum in teaching terms still would make me a fucking bum!

Let me ask you, what's WORSE (not worst bdw), losing to someone 5 years ago or getting outclassed for 24 rounds in back to back fights? Losing to Prescott at anytime is worse than losing to Canelo or Lara. (Which is funny you'd even ask considering the tread you're in) and how long ago it was that khan survived Maidana. Only for some to turn around and try to give Khan credit for these past 2 weeks. Lot of nerve indeed.