So we've had this conversation a million times. I'm adamant todays era sucks because fighters don't fight one another and the champion (and his titlist brother) do not often enough fight the best fighters. so I've done a little research and selected the Klits and 3 fighters who people say their era was weak. Now lets remember, ANY fighter can only fight who's there to fight, I've never blamed either brother for that. Now, head to head means nothing in this thread, it doesn't prove anything because its just a fantasy fight.
So, for the purpose of this thread I've used The Ring's annual rankings. Some ranked contenders may have been missed because rhese are year end rankings, but it's an even playing field for each fighter. Feel free to check my work, I've already double checked it. How this works is I've taken each fighter and listed every top 10 fighter he has fought while being top 10 ranked himself. I did not use ABC champion such as Bruno for Tyson or Schultz foe Wlad because they were not ranked. The only exception I made was ranking Spinks a champion because he was in fact the lineal champ when he fought Tyson. I've used each contenders rank from The Ring and divided that number by number of contender. Champions naturally have a zero and you can figure out the rest.
Here we go!!
Vitaly Klitschko
Byrd 10 loss
Lewis Champion loss
Sanders 9
Peter 8
Arreola 6
Adamek 3
6 top 10 fighters faced, average rank 6
Wladimir Klitschko
Byrd 10
McCline 10
Sanders 3 loss
Brewster 10 loss
Peter 9
Ibragimov 9
Chagaev 4
Chambers 7
Haye 2
Povetkin 2
10 top 10 fighters faced, average rank 6.6
Mike Tyson
Berbick 7
Thomas 5
Tucker3
Biggs 9
Spinks Champion
Williams 8
Douglas 7
Ruddock 4
Ruddock 4
Holyfield 1
Holyfield champion loss
Lewis champion loss
12 top 10 fighters faced, average rank 4.4
Joe Louis
Carnera 3
Schmeling 1 Loss
Ettore 9
Pastor 9
Braddock champion
Farr 2
Pastor 2
Godoy 2
Godoy 2
B. Baer 7
Simon 5
Conn 1
Nova 8
Mauriello 1
Walcott 3
Walcott 1
Charles champion loss
Brion 7
Marciano champion loss
19 top 10 fighters faced, average rank 3.6
Larry Holmes
Norton 2
Evangelista 7
Weaver 4
Shavers 5
Berbick 6
L. Spinks 7
Snipes 10
Cooney 7
Cobb 9
Witherspoon 5
Smith 9
Williams 9
Spinks champion loss
Tyson champion loss
Mercer 8
15 top 10 fighters faced, average rank 5.12
Make of this what you will, but the facts speak for themselves.
Great thread and research mate. I don't know if you saw but i was looking at doing a very similar thing in your 'Rummys Corner' thread
I especially like the research on the kind of competition the challengers faced, as i feel that is the biggest difference between now and the past. Lots of fighters in Kbro era sat around waiting for the payday, and consequently werent proven or experienced by the time they got in the ring to face such a great fighter.
Thanks man, I appreciate that. Feel free to throw in anything you can dig up yourself. I don't have as much time these days as I use to.
Yeah, I'm against putting Heavies on p4p lists and have caught some flak for it. I generally don't like p4p anyway and think they're bullsh1t for anything more than a fun exercise in the meaningless :hah9:
I think it really depends on what your P4P list is for.
If its a traditional p4p list, ie, if they were the same size who would be the best in the world type thing, then yeah HWs are gonna have a hard time.
But, imo that type of list is normally extremely flawed, and most lists, includong mine, tend more towards purely about greatness in that era, how dominant were you, how good were your opponents. In which case i see no reason M.Ali couldnt be in the top 10. I generally judge HWs differently as well, they arent going to be able to fight loads of champions or move around the weights, so i cant mark them down for that. For them its all about top 5/ top 10 opposition and who you dethroned, whether you beat some of the top guys from the era after yours etc.
Ali has a preposterous resume really. He did everything you could ever want a HW to do, and i see no reason he cant be one of the top P4P fighters of all time
This was an interesting study. I'm looking forward to doing another one from the past few years to determine where THIS era stands as of now.
Mind you, newer era's have weakened due to so many orgs and the politics of said orgs. But that all bears weight on an era's strength or weakness.
Great thread and research mate. I don't know if you saw but i was looking at doing a very similar thing in your 'Rummys Corner' thread
I especially like the research on the kind of competition the challengers faced, as i feel that is the biggest difference between now and the past. Lots of fighters in Kbro era sat around waiting for the payday, and consequently werent proven or experienced by the time they got in the ring to face such a great fighter.
ITs easy to look at other era’s, having seen a full career pan out , and decide it was a great era. Similarly you forget overtime about the dull fights and remember only the best.
We have yet to see what the likes of Whyte, Joshua, Parker, etc carve out of a career. Let’s give them that opportunity and thrive on what is around us rather than compare to other generations. The judge of that can come over time.
For the moment The heavyweight division is as interesting to watch as any , I don’t think I could’ve named ten heavyweight ms I was truly interested in watching 5 years ago now I could easily ..
Joshua, Whyte, Povetkin, Ortiz, wilder, Parker, fury, Miller - let’s be quite realistic. Any of these fighters most of us on here would watch and in a fight against each other, despite there being clear favourites , you could see arguments for any beating any. Most of them haven’t fought each other yet so next couple of years could throw a number of good foghts
This was an interesting study. I'm looking forward to doing another one from the past few years to determine where THIS era stands as of now.
Mind you, newer era's have weakened due to so many orgs and the politics of said orgs. But that all bears weight on an era's strength or weakness.
Thats because you guys don't really get it see? its not just that modern fighters have gotten bigger, they have actually evolved. Over the course of one or two generations today's fighters have gotten bigger, faster, and a lot smarter also! Even though it takes most species thousands of years humans are special. If you were to take the skeleton of Joe Louis and a Klit brother you would find that the Louis skeleton practically just lost the tail at the Sacral area of the spine. The Klit skeleton would meanwhile have extra vertabrea fused in from our adaptation to gravity....producing incredible punching power like the ancients have never seen.
And all those old trainers....like Futch were superstitious. Today's trainers are totally scientific!
I encourage everybody to green k this post! :rofl:
Yeah, I'm against putting Heavies on p4p lists and have caught some flak for it. I generally don't like p4p anyway and think they're bullsh1t for anything more than a fun exercise in the meaningless :hah9:
And.....many knowledgable boxing trainers feel that Ali actually missed his prime and think he would have even been better if not for the riff that caused him to get banned.
It is not fair to compare resumes with Louis and Ali. Nobody believes the Klitschko's could be compared with them. They have done really well in this era tho.
They're good fighters in a bad era. And it doesn't help them they don't face more top 10 comp, especially Vits.
yea,,the size thing does get ridiculously overrated on here
Thats because you guys don't really get it see? its not just that modern fighters have gotten bigger, they have actually evolved. Over the course of one or two generations today's fighters have gotten bigger, faster, and a lot smarter also! Even though it takes most species thousands of years humans are special. If you were to take the skeleton of Joe Louis and a Klit brother you would find that the Louis skeleton practically just lost the tail at the Sacral area of the spine. The Klit skeleton would meanwhile have extra vertabrea fused in from our adaptation to gravity....producing incredible punching power like the ancients have never seen.
And all those old trainers....like Futch were superstitious. Today's trainers are totally scientific!
It is not fair to compare resumes with Louis and Ali. Nobody believes the Klitschko's could be compared with them. They have done really well in this era tho.
That's really just a sick (good sick) resume......
It really is. I'm contemplating moving Ali ahead of Louis on my all time top 10 heavyweight list and readjusting a new tip 20 p4p list. I usually don't include heavyweights, but when you look at it like this its pretty damn impressive.
List updated with the addition of Ken Norton
Muhammad Ali 27
Joe Louis 19
Evander Holyfield 18
Ezzard Charles 18
Jersey Joe Walcott 17
Floyd Patterson 16
Larry Holmes 15
Lennox Lewis 14
Joe Frazier 12
Mike Tyson 12
Primo Carnera 12
George Foreman 11
Ken Norton 11
Sonny Liston 10
Wladimir Klitschko 10
Rocky Marciano 9
Vittles Klitschko 6
James Braddock 5
List updated with the addition of Muhammad Ali
Muhammad Ali 27
Joe Louis 19
Evander Holyfield 18
Ezzard Charles 18
Jersey Joe Walcott 17
Floyd Patterson 16
Larry Holmes 15
Lennox Lewis 14
Joe Frazier 12
Mike Tyson 12
Primo Carnera 12
George Foreman 11
Sonny Liston 10
Wladimir Klitschko 10
Rocky Marciano 9
Vittles Klitschko 6
James Braddock 5
List updated with the addition of James Braddock.
Joe Louis 19
Evander Holyfield 18
Ezzard Charles 18
Jersey Joe Walcott 17
Floyd Patterson 16
Larry Holmes 15
Lennox Lewis 14
Joe Frazier 12
Mike Tyson 12
Primo Carnera 12
George Foreman 11
Sonny Liston 10
Wladimir Klitschko 10
Rocky Marciano 9
Vittles Klitschko 6
James Braddock 5
List updated with the addition of Jersey Joe Walcott.
Joe Louis 19
Evander Holyfield 18
Ezzard Charles 18
Jersey Joe Walcott 17
Floyd Patterson 16
Larry Holmes 15
Lennox Lewis 14
Joe Frazier 12
Mike Tyson 12
Primo Carnera 12
George Foreman 11
Sonny Liston 10
Wladimir Klitschko 10
Rocky Marciano 9
Vittles Klitschko 6
List updated with the addition of Ezzard Charles.
Joe Louis 19
Evander Holyfield 18
Ezzard Charles 18
Floyd Patterson 16
Larry Holmes 15
Lennox Lewis 14
Joe Frazier 12
Mike Tyson 12
Primo Carnera 12
George Foreman 11
Sonny Liston 10
Wladimir Klitschko 10
Rocky Marciano 9
Vittles Klitschko 6