Golovkin would kill Froch at 168

I was only joking HB. Although I will say AA hides behind a guard for the first half of most of his fights. I like GGG and I favour him to beat Froch, but as I said before it really is wild speculation because we just haven't seen Golovkin at that level and at that weight, in the pros. Yeah me too, but wouldn't bet the house on it

He mostly blows out non contenders, and wasn't all that scared vs AA, till late at least. Only vs Froch was he close to that scared, even there he committed more at times I was only joking HB. Although I will say AA hides behind a guard for the first half of most of his fights. I like GGG and I favour him to beat Froch, but as I said before it really is wild speculation because we just haven't seen Golovkin at that level and at that weight, in the pros.

Dirrell's pretty terrified of his shadow. Who looks terrified here? http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/276551_o.gif

Barely any, he's excellent when he can back a guy up, and average when he can't. It's why Ouma had so much success, GGG can easily be lured into a brawl, and he's not going to win against Froch like that. For a massive puncher its not a crazy idea to go toe to toe with a featherfist

Dirrell's pretty terrified of his shadow. He mostly blows out non contenders, and wasn't all that scared vs AA, till late at least. Only vs Froch was he close to that scared, even there he committed more at times

a fantasy win for GGG? I still think Froch dominantes and hurts GGG

Froch still wins this fight, perfect for him.

Hell no. GGG keeps his hands up and shows some head movement here and there. Barely any, he's excellent when he can back a guy up, and average when he can't. It's why Ouma had so much success, GGG can easily be lured into a brawl, and he's not going to win against Froch like that.

why aren't the champions accepting his challenge, when he's constantly calling people out with desperation, like "Sergio Martinez, Peter Quillin, ANYBODY! Guys, PLEEASE! I am champion"? They're ducking him for a reason. Fighters understand the situation. Sergio Martinez is injured and no one is going to turn down a PPV fight with Cotto to fight Golovkin. Quillin is on Showtime. Golovkin is certainly high risk, low reward. That doesn't mean he should get all these hypothetical victories when his best real win is over a shopworn Matt Macklin.

Yes, wins over Macklin, Stevens, Rosado and Proksa clearly prove that GGG would murk Carl Froch. :ugh:

Macklin was clear cut top 10. Stevens and Proksa were also Ring top 10, but much more questionable. But remember how terrified Dirrell was of Stevens Dirrell's pretty terrified of his shadow.

This is typical reactionary sh1t. Golovkin hasn't fought anyone. He seems to get better the more he doesn't fight anyone. It's like the Paul Williams disease why aren't the champions accepting his challenge, when he's constantly calling people out with desperation, like "Sergio Martinez, Peter Quillin, ANYBODY! Guys, PLEEASE! I am champion"? They're ducking him for a reason. Fighters understand the situation.

This is typical reactionary sh1t. Golovkin hasn't fought anyone. He seems to get better the more he doesn't fight anyone. It's like the Paul Williams disease

utter joke.................

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw Macklin. Made him look like he didn't belong in the top 100. if you can't see the EXTREME speed difference between golovkin and groves i would argue that you're pretty much blind. groves has much more speed not only with his hands but also with his legs. it's like comparing day to night........... the speed is what was causing froch trouble (many of those shots froch simply could not see because they were lightning) golovkin is a much slower smaller guy (& to be honest who's to say that he hits harder then groves at smw) groves is a lot more athletic then golovkin........... joke. It's not just speed that causes Froch trouble, it's ring intelligence and accuracy. Dirrell is faster than Ward yet Ward did better against Froch. These unorthodox fighters often get exposed by fundamentally sound boxers.

if you can't see the EXTREME speed difference between golovkin and groves i would argue that you're pretty much blind. groves has much more speed not only with his hands but also with his legs. it's like comparing day to night........... the speed is what was causing froch trouble (many of those shots froch simply could not see because they were lightning) golovkin is a much slower smaller guy (& to be honest who's to say that he hits harder then groves at smw) groves is a lot more athletic then golovkin........... joke.

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw stop yelling his name before he ends up getting canelo'ed ... those smw's are no joke if they cut down to 160 you better believe everyone across the ring is going to sleep Macklin was clear cut top 10. Stevens and Proksa were also Ring top 10, but much more questionable. But remember how terrified Dirrell was of Stevens

I think froch is easier fight for golovkin than groves due to style

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw stop yelling his name before he ends up getting canelo'ed ... those smw's are no joke if they cut down to 160 you better believe everyone across the ring is going to sleep

He has always been very easy to hit, I don't see how it was a shock to anyone. Well shows you show the boxing IQ on Boxingscene is quite low, Froch has to one of the most easiest fighters to hit at the moment. It doesn't really take a genius to work that one out.