Who would do better against Mayweather : Pacquiao or Bradley?

I quit boxing at 16 if we're discussing resumes twat. Furthermore I didn't say you did or did not know about boxing technique. I was on subject of whether Bradley knows or doesn't how to throw a proper bunch. All you've done is continue with your internet badassry and still haven't given any sensible reason why you believe a pro of many years wouldn't know how to throw a proper punch you ignorant tampon. Bradley after Tommy Hearns demonstrated how to throw a straight right: "wow, i never knew you had to turn your body into it so much" and if he knows in his head, his body definitely doesn't because his technique is awful

i've been boxing since i was 15, tool... and it doesn't take a genius to know what proper punching technique is, i know i already called you retard but i didn't believe it, now im actually curious, are you retarded for real? like have you been diagnosed for retardation? I quit boxing at 16 if we're discussing resumes twat. Furthermore I didn't say you did or did not know about boxing technique. I was on subject of whether Bradley knows or doesn't how to throw a proper bunch. All you've done is continue with your internet badassry and still haven't given any sensible reason why you believe a pro of many years wouldn't know how to throw a proper punch you ignorant tampon.

Yup, somewhere along the lines you became an expert in punching technique and are able to say which pro knows how to throw punches. Knowing how to throw punches and throwing (proper) punches are not the same. Now I understand that across the internet regular folk become badas$' and $h!t. But I'll tell you this because this is as close to common sense as a fool like you will get: Timothy Bradley knows far more about proper technique in the sport of boxing than an internet bada$$ like yourself ever could. i've been boxing since i was 15, tool... and it doesn't take a genius to know what proper punching technique is, i know i already called you retard but i didn't believe it, now im actually curious, are you retarded for real? like have you been diagnosed for retardation?

floyd will take bradley with zero roadblock. aks floyd sr and uncle roger. :bigeyes:

yes retard, there are plenty of fighters that dont throw with proper punching technique ever seen cabellero? calzaghe? bradley is a wide sloppy arm puncher and sometimes 'slapper' but ofcourse you wouldn't know sht about punching technique, not like you know sht about boxing in general Yup, somewhere along the lines you became an expert in punching technique and are able to say which pro knows how to throw punches. Knowing how to throw punches and throwing (proper) punches are not the same. Now I understand that across the internet regular folk become badas$' and $h!t. But I'll tell you this because this is as close to common sense as a fool like you will get: Timothy Bradley knows far more about proper technique in the sport of boxing than an internet bada$$ like yourself ever could.

Is it that simple though? You can't just look at the attributes, you have to look at how the attributes would match up against a smart mover/counterpuncher. both would give floyd tough fights and make him work, but tim would get outclasses as he would have nothing to hurt floyd with but his big dome headbutt... Manny was the handspeed and straight lefts with power that would cause floyd more problems IMO I favor floyd to beat both, but manny is a tougher out

It's an easy question for me to answer and I know I'm gonna fall in the minority with this as well. It's Bradley, he has more dimensions to his game. He cuts off the ring better than Manny, he can fight in the pocket better and he'll simply give Mayweather different looks. Bradley does fight out of the pocket better, but one of Manny's main strengths is the different angles and looks he gives opponents. Bradley would be one of the few that could box with Mayweather, but Manny's in-and-out style against Floyd's shoulder roll and counters seems like it would be really fun to watch. Everything Bradley does, Floyd does better. Floyd would win about 8 of 12 rounds, en route to a clear decision victory. Manny has superior power and equal or possibly better speed, but I think he'd have a hard time landing. Manny would do better. Floyd would probably win against both, though.

I'd love to see him fight both of these guys next year if possible.

Mayweather seniors want Bradley, so... go figure. :unitedsta

So what you saying is a pro fighter for umteen years doesn't know how to throw a proper punch huh?? Well then, that's the end of that I guess. yes retard, there are plenty of fighters that dont throw with proper punching technique ever seen cabellero? calzaghe? bradley is a wide sloppy arm puncher and sometimes 'slapper' but ofcourse you wouldn't know sht about punching technique, not like you know sht about boxing in general

they both would do good ..but pac would do better...

I didn't say Bradley won. But the fight was close and it was a shame that it was close considering Bradley had 2 bum legs most of the fight. It wasn't close on press row, The average was 117-111, that's really wide. Very few close scores reported, there were more 11-1s for Pac.

Quote: Originally Posted by Doctor_Tenma With Mayweather not being the puncher Pacquiao is or I should say dynamic, don't you think Bradley would put more focus on his own offense? Lets be real now. no, he'd try and fight floyd like he fought marquez, running and ambushing then going back to running, minimising the exchanges as much as possible, just pumping the jab but not landing for sht when he's out pumping the jab floyd will feed him a right hand or left hook, when he comes in to land he wont land i dont see him pushing floyd back much at all Judah was touching Floyd, and dropped him. Manny stops him. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Bradley but it aint saying much. Floyd is on several levels above them as fighters and always has been.

pacquiao can actually throw straights, bradley can't pacquiao can dash foward because he has competent feet for that kind of stuff, bradley can't bradley for the most part can only throw wide sloppy hooks he doesn't actually know how to throw a proper punch with his shoulder in it So what you saying is a pro fighter for umteen years doesn't know how to throw a proper punch huh?? Well then, that's the end of that I guess.

well Marquez is not ordinary fighter and vs Bradley it was not even a close fight, even Pac haters called it robbery, Tim has also somewhat proven his worth vs Marquez.... I didn't say Bradley won. But the fight was close and it was a shame that it was close considering Bradley had 2 bum legs most of the fight.

Yeah, most stupid people believe Pacman beats Floyd maybe. But no one with no damn sense believes that joke.

I think Pac would do better against Mayweather.

Floyd doesn't really want to fight either guy to be fair. Pac may get outboxed but has more of a chance to drop/ko Floyd than Bradley and Bradley will stand a better chance to outbox Floyd than Pac does. I'd favor Floyd over either guy but he is afraid of both.

i gotta go with manny, for the simple fact of being faster, and more powerful,, Is it that simple though? You can't just look at the attributes, you have to look at how the attributes would match up against a smart mover/counterpuncher.