Floyd Mayweather JR using triangle theory to prove he beats SRL

I wouldn't expect Floyd to say that he thinks he would lose to Leonard regardless. Of course he wouldn't. Still, what Floyd was saying here clearly wasn't implying that he would beat Leonard and the reason being the connection between his Dad and himself. Just frankly a really stupid thread.

You mean Camacho? And where does he say that proves he beat's Leonard? All he say's is that they're connected. Doesn't mention beating him once in that segment. I wouldn't expect Floyd to say that he thinks he would lose to Leonard regardless.

Yep, this thread failed

He literally didn't do any of that. He even answered the question on SLR by saying he doesn't know how a fight between them wouldve played out, yet you still managed misinterpret that and come up with an assumption even after hearing him say it. Gotta love boxingscene. Exactly. Completely ridiculous.

He literally didn't do any of that. He even answered the question on SLR by saying he doesn't know how a fight between them wouldve played out, yet you still managed misinterpret that and come up with an assumption even after hearing him say it. Gotta love boxingscene.

How was he clearly going to ask him that? You know this how? He said that Leonard fought his Dad to which Floyd said it's crazy how we're connected and listed how they're connected. Nothing to do with a fight between them or "proving he'd beat him" like your false title suggests. Again, he doesn't say it, nor imply it. yeah, after rewatching it,, i gotta agree,, it was a sorta six degrees of kevin bacon type thing

The radio host was clearly going to ask if he thought Floyd would beat Leonard but Floyd interrupts him to tell him this long ass triangle theory. How was he clearly going to ask him that? You know this how? He said that Leonard fought his Dad to which Floyd said it's crazy how we're connected and listed how they're connected. Nothing to do with a fight between them or "proving he'd beat him" like your false title suggests. Again, he doesn't say it, nor imply it.

I think floyd didnt want to talk about a possible fight between him and SRL,, thats why he went into that triangle theory,,, to say camacho beat SRL,, thats like saying lucas browne beat toney who beat mccallum etc

Complete failure of the triangle theory. I like Floyd, I think he's great and the best of his decade. But I would take SRL in his prime over Floyd in his prime any day. Floyd never faced someone that could move as well as SRL. Plus Leonard had a great jab, and he had knockout power as well. That would be a really bad fight for Floyd.

He "instigates" it? :lol1: He really doesn't. He say's it's crazy how they're connected. Then list's a chain of four fights that connects them. He's clearly not implying that that means he would beat Leonard. He doesn't say it, nor imply it. The radio host was clearly going to ask if he thought Floyd would beat Leonard but Floyd interrupts him to tell him this long ass triangle theory.

He instigates that CLEARLY. He "instigates" it? :lol1: He really doesn't. He say's it's crazy how they're connected. Then list's a chain of four fights that connects them. He's clearly not implying that that means he would beat Leonard. He doesn't say it, nor imply it.

clearly fraud is showing signs of delusions, a side effect of too much steroids in his system.

You mean Camacho? And where does he say that proves he beat's Leonard? All he say's is that they're connected. Doesn't mention beating him once in that segment. He instigates that CLEARLY.

You mean Camacho? And where does he say that proves he beat's Leonard? All he say's is that they're connected. Doesn't mention beating him once in that segment.