The GGG hate is outstanding

Triple G isn't hated, a myth created by racist Pac fans I'm a admirer of Triple G and look forwards to all his fights from now on, I was impressed the way he used his jab last night and his amazing power, he has flaws, but i'm sure he will work on them. I'm also a admirer of Floyd These guys are great for boxing No one is invincible. but if FrankieBruno is saying Golovkin is a good fighter, he probably is.

Triple G isn't hated, a myth created by racist Pac fans I'm a admirer of Triple G and look forwards to all his fights from now on, I was impressed the way he used his jab last night and his amazing power, he has flaws, but i'm sure he will work on them. I'm also a admirer of Floyd These guys are great for boxing

I honestly think its Floyd fans(me included) who hate on him. Now don't get me wrong I think of him highly as a fighter and after Quilin's show against Rosado I would have him the clear favourite. But...... like you said there these people going on like hes a God and that just pisses you off when HoF's like Pacquiao,Cotto and Marquez are spoken down on so much. Then there are the skills argument. This is what pisses me off most. You have haters saying "GGG is a face first brawler", but then his fans come in to defend him saying "oh no, he's making small adjustments and is actually very skillful going forward". BUT, when Floyd,Lara,Rigo fans say "look at the subtle skills hes using, making his opponent chase him and miss punches" then the GGG fans go "why won't he stop running". It's childish, moronic and hypocritical. I don't get it. Why would a Mayweather fan hate Golovkin? I don't call myself a Mayweather fan but I freely admit he the best fighter in the world, still getting better, because of his incredible skills, conditioning, and most of all, ability to adapt and be smart. Equally, Rigondoux has skills that are similarly awe-inspiring. I think Golovkin's footwork and timing are excellent and make him great to watch. Why should admiration of one translate to dismissing the other?

I'm a Floyd fan but I don't hate Golovkin. I'm a fan of em both.

'Hate', 'Hater', 'Haterz' etc. All that crap is annoying.

The Triple G hate is minor....more dudes here respect his hands game than those who don't....quit the victim act sh1t....Triple G don't even register on the top 5 most hated here.... so that lil bit of hate he gets is far from outstanding To accuse a certain group of posters of hating on dude for the same reasons another group loves him is just the twisted fake ass fraudulent NSB way

GGG is a fluid fighter, quite slick for a Russian. He displayed beautiful technique and boxing skill vs Stevens. He doesn't really deserve any hate, if you're a true boxing fan.

Maybe they're Matthyse fans afraid of getting hurt again.

STOP HATING! GGG good boys those guys out all in 6 rounds in the same night. You just hate him because he's not "slick". Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with. To be fair that poster is supremely biased and has been making idiotic posts for months. he doesn't critique ****, his agenda is clear as day. There is a lot of people who aren't clear who the 'haters" are, but that is definitely one of them, IMO.

Oh, yes. You'd have loved the Chavez and Tyson era :lol1: Oh god. I couldn't even imagine. Especially when Chavez hit 87-0. Thats fine, but how many people on here are just as bad as the fan boy trolls but who's sole mission is to hate the guy? Every thread you entire you see alts and "haters" saying moronic stuff just to make Golovkin fans look bad. You know where the real fans on here are. But majority of people look at guy like thuggery's posts and say "i hate Golovkin for his fans" and then post trash just as bad as fan boys in response. Hating a fighter because of his fans...even worse, hating a fighter because of how his fans represent themselves on a boxing forum is stupid no matter who it is. Especially when you don't even know who is real and who is a troll alt trying to get a rise out of people. Fans could be annoying but it shouldn't affect your view on a certain boxer. If anything, there is more talking about fighters' fans on this forum than the fighters themselves. Who gives a **** who the next man likes to watch? But the numerous threads saying "WAA!!! WAAA!!! WAAA!!! Black people hate Golovkin WAAA!!!!" are ignorant and juvenile responses to legitimate threads discussing what they saw last night from a skills standpoint.

Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with. Thats fine, but how many people on here are just as bad as the fan boy trolls but who's sole mission is to hate the guy? Every thread you entire you see alts and "haters" saying moronic stuff just to make Golovkin fans look bad. You know where the real fans on here are. But majority of people look at guy like thuggery's posts and say "i hate Golovkin for his fans" and then post trash just as bad as fan boys in response.

Its crazy. After Rigo vs. Donaire numerous people were questioning Rigo's ability to fight inside. After Broner vs. Rees numerous people were questioning Broner's leaky defense, footwork and his ability to deal with movement. After Wilder's last fight people were criticizing him moving backwards in a straight line and his sloppy technique. All 3 fights the winner flat out dominated and was given props yet the criticisms were fair. This was no different. You can learn things about a fighter no matter the level of opposition he is in the ring with. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fighters flaws. If you disagree, point out why instead of screaming racism, nationalism, or whatever excuse you are trying to come up with to avoid having an intelligent boxing discussion. Fanboys are so damn annoying. Oh, yes. You'd have loved the Chavez and Tyson era :lol1:

Precisely. It's like if you don't say Golovkin is flawless then you "hate" him. I've said that Golovkin would beat everyone at 160 outside of maybe Martinez. That's he's very difficult to beat and one of the hardest punchers in the sport. The fact he showed a few weaknesses and I've highlighted them, that's describing as me hating the guy :lol1: Its crazy. After Rigo vs. Donaire numerous people were questioning Rigo's ability to fight inside. After Broner vs. Rees numerous people were questioning Broner's leaky defense, footwork and his ability to deal with movement. After Wilder's last fight people were criticizing him moving backwards in a straight line and his sloppy technique. All 3 fights the winner flat out dominated and was given props yet the criticisms were fair. This was no different. You can learn things about a fighter no matter the level of opposition he is in the ring with. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fighters flaws. If you disagree, point out why instead of screaming racism, nationalism, or whatever excuse you are trying to come up with to avoid having an intelligent boxing discussion. Fanboys are so damn annoying.

He's a good fighter but i'm not sold on him being elite yet. His fights with Rosado, and Stevens have shown that he doesn't always blast out his opponents, even if they are small middleweights. IT seems he will move up to 168 at some point, and that is a huge jump in terms of size and strength of opponents, if you think the likes of Ward/Froch/Kessler are anything like the guys he has been fighting, you are sorely mistaken as ALL of his opponents would be demolished in brutal fashion by all of those guys. We need to see if his power and skill will be enough when he starts taking on Bigger, stronger, and higher level fighters than the C/D levellers he's clubbing out now. Maybe they will, but i'm on the wait-and-see side of things Fighters usually move up when they are growing, GGG is already a full grown man, I don't think he is going to get any bigger or have any problems making 160 any time soon.

Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with. Precisely. It's like if you don't say Golovkin is flawless then you "hate" him. I've said that Golovkin would beat everyone at 160 outside of maybe Martinez. That's he's very difficult to beat and one of the hardest punchers in the sport. The fact he showed a few weaknesses and I've highlighted them, that's describing as me hating the guy :lol1:

only the posers here hate him the "KO's aren't exciting" guys who pretend to like boring fights those guys try to hard to appear like boxing connoisseurs no reason not to like GGG, he's all action

GGG hype is insane - "he'll knock out Ward" "he'll knock out Froch" "he''ll knockout Mayweather" is what I'm seeing a lot of in here and on Youtube except Youtubers throw around the n-word on every GGG fight video that has over 15 comments :lol1: . I've heard the boxing media say that he is the greatest middleweight since Sugar Ray Robinson :banghead: . The hype has surpassed that of Lucian Bute hype by 15-20 times so you should expect to have a reflection to that hype with logic. GGG just handled a low tier ESPN fighter pretty well but the future has yet to be seen.

For every golovkin fan boy, there is an equal golovkin hater saying things just as stupid. This site was flooded and is still flooded with racist alts against gololvkin. At this point it seems there are more golovkin haters in full steam hating in every thread than golovkin fans celebrating his victory. This is very odd since golovkin is one of the nicest guys around, fights his heart out and looks for the KO every time out Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with.

Yes there is alot of hating and nutriding on ggg,,,, i think the level-headed fans realize that ggg is fun to watch, has great skills, great punching power, but he does have some defense issues when going backwards,, I dont think that is hating,

STOP HATING! GGG good boys those guys out all in 6 rounds in the same night. You just hate him because he's not "slick". For every golovkin fan boy, there is an equal golovkin hater saying things just as stupid. This site was flooded and is still flooded with racist alts against gololvkin. At this point it seems there are more golovkin haters in full steam hating in every thread than golovkin fans celebrating his victory. This is very odd since golovkin is one of the nicest guys around, fights his heart out and looks for the KO every time out