Better defense: Broner or Bradley?

Bradley because he's been with far superior competition. Neither guy is unhittable by any means.

Bradley because he's been with far superior competition. Neither guy is unhittable though

If someone got "barely touched all fight" as you said then people wouldn't be able to make those gifs. Bradley got dropped twice by Holt, you said outside of the Ruslan fight Bradley has always been hard to hit but it's not true. It's a fight,three punches = being touch all night??Esp when ya gif are showing rds 1 3 and 4?? Bradley was dropped by Holt twice,yet still was not touch like that in that fight..Like I said,outside of the first and the last rd..Holt did not win any others..Mainly because he could not hit Bradley cleanly..Which is what I said from my first post..Outside of Prov,nobody has been able to hit Bradley to much..That's is true.. Do you honestly believe Pac landed 253 shots on Bradley??

I don't know, I think Broner's defense at close quarters is better while Bradley's is better from mid to long range.

Wow four punches..That proves your point.. Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL.. If someone got "barely touched all fight" as you said then people wouldn't be able to make those gifs. Bradley got dropped twice by Holt, you said outside of the Ruslan fight Bradley has always been hard to hit but it's not true.

http://www.fightreport.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tim-bradley_kendall-holt.gif http://i.imgur.com/s8MXq.gif http://i.imgur.com/B6odf.gif http://i.imgur.com/0OZ5a.gif Wow four punches..That proves your point.. Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL..

Actually Bradley has been very hard to hit over his career..The prov fight removed,nobody has landed much on Bradley.. http://www.fightreport.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tim-bradley_kendall-holt.gif You may need to watch the Pac fight again..Pac barely touch Bradley all fight..253 punches landed,if you believe that I have a bridge in Manhattan I wanna sell you.. http://i.imgur.com/s8MXq.gif http://i.imgur.com/B6odf.gif http://i.imgur.com/0OZ5a.gif

I'd go with Broner as the better defensive fighter. He can stand in front of you and still pretty difficult to hit clean. Bradley's footwork is better which allows him to move out of danger, but his actual defense is far from watertight.

It's hard to hit something that runs. Bradley also keeps you at bay because the other fighter is being cautious to Bradley head butts

broner...bradley has been hit flush several times with power punches (i.e. against pac and most definitely against provo) You may need to watch the Pac fight again..Pac barely touch Bradley all fight..253 punches landed,if you believe that I have a bridge in Manhattan I wanna sell you..

Broner has the much tighter defense, it's not even close. Bradley has never been hard to hit. Actually Bradley has been very hard to hit over his career..The prov fight removed,nobody has landed much on Bradley..

Obviously Bradley, the people that will tell you otherwise probably discount all the leather Paulie landed just because he cant punch...

broner...bradley has been hit flush several times with power punches (i.e. against pac and most definitely against provo)

Broner has the much tighter defense, it's not even close. Bradley has never been hard to hit.

I want to say Bradley but only because of his movement's speed but his defense isn't much better. Also Bradley's been in with much greater opposition and shown resiliance but not defense really. The Pac fight comes to mind for me but I feel Bradley clearly lost that fight. IDK when Broner fights Maidana I feel we will see alot of what we have wanted to. Maidanas not an A fighter but hes a solid b fighter and Broner is still a B fighter to me.

Broner has better D

Both Bradely & Broner to me have great defenses. I'd still give the edge to Bradley though after what he was able to do to Juan Manuel Marquez. The only other time I've seen Marquez who Imo is an ATG so frustrated & looked so average was against Floyd Mayweather Jr. Bradley had his work cut out for him though vs Ruslan,Broner was getting tagged a little to much by Paulie M level of competition separates the two for now.

Both Bradely & Broner to me have great defenses. I'd still give the edge to Bradley though after what he was able to do to Juan Manuel Marquez. The only other time I've seen Marquez who Imo is an ATG so frustrated & looked so average was against Floyd Mayweather Jr. Bradley had his work cut out for him though vs Ruslan,Broner was getting tagged a little to much by Paulie M level of competition separates the two for now

Bradley has proven his defense against so much better competition. Neither guy is exactly a defensive demon. This. I don't think any other answer is right.

Bradley has proven his defense against so much better competition. Neither guy is exactly a defensive demon.