Dwyer hoping once again Klitschko loses?

many ignorants here dont know the bet game because a guy may advise people to BET on a certain outcome, doesnt mean that that outcome is likely, or that he sides with that outcome it means that there is good odds on that outcome, good enough to put a little bit of money on to win a big ratio, and many fights you can make other bets at the same time so you can break even in worst case scenario almost regardless of result Yeah, I was gonna say, he's not predicting fights, he's predicting the potential of an upset for betting reasons.

He is comparing Martinez on Pavlik to Povetkin on Klitschko .... hmmmm

Know a little about gambling but as a boxing analyst, that dude Dwyer is TERRIBLE. He think he knows way more than he actually does.

that would be main bet: Tony Thompson beats Wlad Side bet: Wlad by KO. If Wlad wins by decision you have to win 5 "careful" bets in a row to get that money back. So - those sidebets work not always, actually if they go wrong, you lose a lot of money. sounds like the odds are kinda crappy, for the particular fight you mentioned it really just depends what the odds are... sometimes very early on after a fight is announced you can get good value for your picks you also bet on the overs and unders etc

many ignorants here dont know the bet game because a guy may advise people to BET on a certain outcome, doesnt mean that that outcome is likely, or that he sides with that outcome it means that there is good odds on that outcome, good enough to put a little bit of money on to win a big ratio, and many fights you can make other bets at the same time so you can break even in worst case scenario almost regardless of result that would be main bet: Tony Thompson beats Wlad Side bet: Wlad by KO. If Wlad wins by decision you have to win 5 "careful" bets in a row to get that money back. So - those sidebets work not always, actually if they go wrong, you lose a lot of money.

many ignorants here dont know the bet game because a guy may advise people to BET on a certain outcome, doesnt mean that that outcome is likely, or that he sides with that outcome it means that there is good odds on that outcome, good enough to put a little bit of money on to win a big ratio, and many fights you can make other bets at the same time so you can break even in worst case scenario almost regardless of result

When did that vid come up? has it hit Utube yet? I usually catch his vids and didn't see that one, of course I did not check today yet. If he did make that prediction that is funny. I love his stuff but sometimes he does teeter on the edge of ridicule. i think he makes a classic mistake of confusing what is possible with what is probable. but he does cover his ass on the spreads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwIJuV2sFMU

Dude predicts Povetkin beats Wlad Klitschko. Didn't Dwyer ALWAYS pick Wlad to lose in the last years? I don't know but I remember he said Tony Thompson will beat him, furthermore he said Antonio Tarver and Bernard Hopkins would beat Wlad. Dwyer the ultimate Klitschko hater? The biggest troll of them all? When did that vid come up? has it hit Utube yet? I usually catch his vids and didn't see that one, of course I did not check today yet. If he did make that prediction that is funny. I love his stuff but sometimes he does teeter on the edge of ridicule. i think he makes a classic mistake of confusing what is possible with what is probable. but he does cover his ass on the spreads.

He did not pick anyone to straigh up beat Wlad, he choses guys who have a chance and go with Wlad by ko as well. If Povetkin can get inside and the judges wont let Wlad lean on him this fight may be interesting. but that means his main bet is on the other guy. Then he bets some more money on Wlad by KO to not lose that much in case the main bet won't work.

He did not pick anyone to straigh up beat Wlad, he choses guys who have a chance and go with Wlad by ko as well. If Povetkin can get inside and the judges wont let Wlad lean on him this fight may be interesting.

^^^^ Both wrong he said the Haye/Wlad and TT/Wlad fights were "50-50" fights. Apart from those two fights he hasn't picked anyone else to beat Wlad. I am pretty sure he predicted Thompson to beat Wlad. Furthermore he picked Tarver and Hopkins to beat him also in a fantasy matchup.

^^^^ Both wrong he said the Haye/Wlad and TT/Wlad fights were "50-50" fights. Apart from those two fights he hasn't picked anyone else to beat Wlad.

:) I think he predicted Wlad to lose at least 10 times... If he would be right now he would indeed look like a genius... I know he picked Thompson both times & fairly sure he picked Haye. Wonder if he picked Pianeta or Wach or a Mormeck lol

If you throw enough darts then you'll eventually hit the bullseye. :) I think he predicted Wlad to lose at least 10 times... If he would be right now he would indeed look like a genius...

If you throw enough darts then you'll eventually hit the bullseye.