Not really a serious topic lol but I've wondered about this for a while; when we see a blood-and-guts slugfest like Gatti/Ward, Rios/Alvarado, or even Kirkland/Angulo the announcers would often described it as an "old school fight" with typical comments like "this might as well be televised in 50's black and white like the days of Zale Graziano blablabla" but the same term is also often used for fighters like B-Hop, Toney, Sweet Pea who are pretty much the complete opposites of guys like Ward or Rios lol
So what first come to your mind when you hear "old school" ?
Old school implies you're aware of all the tricks in the book...and you're capable of taking care of yourself regardless what is thrown at you: sucker punch, tripping, elbowing, butting, rabbit punching...often times retaliating in like manner. The more modern fighters rely on the ref too much and lose it a split second here and there...for example, on breaks, or just after tapping gloves, or after the bell rings. Observe how Bhop takes advantage of these moments. That's why Bhop eats up young guys. (Maybe literally also!)
I think of an over used term that does not mean much at all. They had some great fights in the 50s and there have been some great fights this year. A great fight is a great fight whether it takes place in 1955 or 2013. Garcia vs. Matthysse might be another great fight. We have some great fighters here right now and they will be involved in some great fights. There were lots of mediocre fights and dull fights in the 1950s and every other decade. Many boxing fans like fighters that are about the same age as themselves the best. Most of the old time fighters usually say the fighters of their day were the best. That's the way it is and always will be.
Old school = down and dirty. Some good stuff, like slipping punches, countering...but also clutching, butting, low blows, head in chest/face...all sorts of Bhop crap. They learn it in the trenches and want to justify its legitimacy by giving it a name: "old school!"
those guys who fights often, anyone and every where
those guys who go all out, wars
those guys who have crafty moves that we dont usually see
all fine, but the middle option does not go along with the other.
you can't and don't go to war every time. that's not how "oldschool" fighters fought. you can be tough, and not fight negatively, without going into all out wars. don't clinch, don't run, and throw punches.
same as slick and throwback.
black fighters.
you're never gonna hear of a slick white/mexican throwback fighter
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
slick white throwback:
boxing experts who have aged often look back on the past with rose tinted glasses. they might call anything impressive "old school." that said, fighters used to fight more often and against better opponents. they'd take losses, but they'd gather an amount of experience that you don't see today.
many of hte great fighters had well over 100 fights. they fought for 15 rounds in championship fights. when not devending titles they'd be scheduled for 10 rounds often, sometimes several times per month. they'd develop nuances of their boxing that you don't see in modern fighters.
same as slick and throwback.
black fighters.
you're never gonna hear of a slick white/mexican throwback fighter
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Not really a serious topic lol but I've wondered about this for a while; when we see a blood-and-guts slugfest like Gatti/Ward, Rios/Alvarado, or even Kirkland/Angulo the announcers would often described it as an "old school fight" with typical comments like "this might as well be televised in 50's black and white like the days of Zale Graziano blablabla" but the same term is also often used for fighters like B-Hop, Toney, Sweet Pea who are pretty much the complete opposites of guys like Ward or Rios lol
So what first come to your mind when you hear "old school" ?
I dunno, different people mean different things in different contexts. I tend to use it for fighters who haven't been carefully matched, y'know, have taken on all comers, win or lose, and who don't ***** about their results. Those guys who are willing to step in with anyone, anywhere and usually fight quite often. Carl Froch is one who springs to mind as an example of this
Different people will have different ideas tho 'cos I've heard the term used lots of different ways.
Not really a serious topic lol but I've wondered about this for a while; when we see a blood-and-guts slugfest like Gatti/Ward, Rios/Alvarado, or even Kirkland/Angulo the announcers would often described it as an "old school fight" with typical comments like "this might as well be televised in 50's black and white like the days of Zale Graziano blablabla" but the same term is also often used for fighters like B-Hop, Toney, Sweet Pea who are pretty much the complete opposites of guys like Ward or Rios lol
So what first come to your mind when you hear "old school" ?
I think of 40-rounders. To me, anything since then is essentially modern.
12y ago
What the hell does "old school" really mean? | BoxingScene Community