the biggest non deserving fighters in p4p list

guerrero #1 canelo # 2 broner# 3 joke p4p fighters.... Guerrero is a joke Canelo we'll find out after the 14th Broner is top 20

It was questionable? >__>... He beat what was considered the top 154 guy thats gotta count for much more than beating Malignaggi and Berto lol. Now that shouldnt put him in the p4p but he'd be breaking close with another solid win imo. Anyway yeah there's always some random picks in the p4p that make you just wtf at the world Good amount of people thought he lost. Even if you thought he won, he beat ONE quality opponent his size. That is but enough for p4p status

I forgot that Canelo is a natural light heavyweight who beat up Archie Solis and normally fights junior welters abd welters. I guess he is p4p after all

lol @ Bradley being on there after losing 10 rounds to Pacquiao and going life and death and losing his speech against a Siberian snow plower. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tY-LYDxWo7U/UWoDPYT0jWI/AAAAAAAAALI/6b_ZxJ3WOAQ/s1600/yes-rudy1.gif

lol @ Bradley being on there after losing 10 rounds to Pacquiao and going life and death and losing his speech against a Siberian snow plower.

After floyd, ward, rigo, jmm- the p4p list turns into a popularity contest,, whoever is gearing up for a floyd fight will most certainly be on the list a month before the fight

For me pound for pound means..if you were in another weight class you would dominate.. It should be a list for guys with serious skills. If your a surpreme boxing talent..IE..u know who.. you can use that skill and any weight class.. if you are a big guy with power, im not sure that pound for pound worthy because if we placed your 20 pounds over your best weight you won't have those advantages.. Maybe I don't make sense

I don't remember ever seeing Guerrero on the P4P. Oh he was on there, to market a certain fight.

I think it's ridiculous to have Canelo on a p4p list when his best and only win over someone his size is a questionable decision. Broner and Guerrero at least have legit wins for titles in multiple weight classes, but no way either belongs in the top 10 p4p. Or even top 25 imo. It was questionable? >__>... He beat what was considered the top 154 guy thats gotta count for much more than beating Malignaggi and Berto lol. Now that shouldnt put him in the p4p but he'd be breaking close with another solid win imo. Anyway yeah there's always some random picks in the p4p that make you just wtf at the world

RING had him on there before he fought Floyd at 10. Then yeah I would agree with that list

I don't remember ever seeing Guerrero on the P4P. RING had him on there before he fought Floyd at 10.

guerrero #1 canelo # 2 broner# 3 joke p4p fighters.... I don't remember ever seeing Guerrero on the P4P.

I still don't think Bradley should be on there.

I think it's ridiculous to have Canelo on a p4p list when his best and only win over someone his size is a questionable decision. Broner and Guerrero at least have legit wins for titles in multiple weight classes, but no way either belongs in the top 10 p4p. Or even top 25 imo.