AlvarezvsTrouth Round 7, Close?

Alvarez did nothing the rest of that round, from what I remember. I score it 10-9.

I've watched the Trout vs Alvarez 4 times now, scoring over an over again. It really was a competitive fight between two young up in comes. But at the end my Score was in favor of Alvarez 116 to 111 but most of the rounds where close. Now my question is after the knockdown in round 7 you heae many people say Trout won the remainder of the round. I watched it over and over again and I just don't see that. He ate quite a few more shots and gave a few of his own but in no way, shape, or form did he do enough to win it. Also the Showtime commentary was oddly in favor of Trouth throughout even through he was losing and was the less popular fighter, what gives? IMO that was a clear 10-8 round. Trout showed heart and was fighting back but didn't land anything big or consistently enough to make it a 10-9 round. After the kd Canelo landed a couple huge straight rights if I remember correctly, and and around the 1:30 mark seemed to hurt trout with a nice right uppercut. After that uppercut Canelo didn't really land anything noteworthy and Trout kept on throwing but like I said didn't really land anything big or cosistently enough to call it a 10-9 round

I'm not sure Trout did enough to deserve a 9-10 in that round, but he may have deserved a 10-8 in the 12th since Canelo did absolutely nothing in that round. Fvck open scoring

Trout did some good work in round 7, could have been a 10-9 round for Canelo instead of 10-8. Ive watched that fight about 3 times and I still go with Canelo 115-112. It was a great close, competitive fight. The open scoring was a joke, it killed it for me the first time i watched it.

I think the argument was it could have been 10-9 instead of 10-8. Trout is the American, Canelo the foreigner. It's natural they would lean towards AT. Also, Paulie had a bone to pick with the Texan judging which he felt would be biased. You're a good poster, but you never EVER waste the opportunity to pull that nationality shtick. I don't care what nationality you are. You'd have to have your eyes closed if you are a freaking professional judge and could somehow get a 118-109 score out of that fight. Paulie was right and that has fvck all to do with what country they happen to be from. Also another thing of note is that unless it is the Olympics most Americans will support who they will support(Usually they will support someone who looks like them, especially in a sport like boxing). The size of the USA makes it inconceivable to ALWAYS just blindly support the Red, White and Blue. I and I'm sure Paulie have no idea of Trout's upbringing dealing with uniqueness of being black from the state of New Mexico being that I'm from the midwest and Paulie lives by the Atlantic Ocean. YOU are the only one with an agenda.

Open scorecards just Sucks, whatever. To me was a 10-8 round, and my total score was 114-113 canelo. Maybe 115-112, a really competitive fight. :luvbed:

It was a competitive 10-8 round. Gasnelo's laughable workrate made Trout look better in that round than he should have. Also no I don't think they were in favor of Trout at all. They were on the defense of Trout because of the horrible scoring by the judges. Were they not right? If there was no open scoring ordinarily everyone would have assumed it was a wire-to-wire fight. Idk I kind of felt they were a lil pro Trout the entire fight although I will agree that your right about the open scoring nonsense and Canelo winning 10 rounds on one judges score card was just mind numbing. I feel the open scoring ruined an otherwise good fight between two young champions.

It was a competitive 10-8 round. Gasnelo's laughable workrate made Trout look better in that round than he should have. Also no I don't think they were in favor of Trout at all. They were on the defense of Trout because of the horrible scoring by the judges. Were they not right? If there was no open scoring ordinarily everyone would have assumed it was a wire-to-wire fight.

I've watched the Trout vs Alvarez 4 times now, scoring over an over again. It really was a competitive fight between two young up in comes. But at the end my Score was in favor of Alvarez 116 to 111 but most of the rounds where close. Now my question is after the knockdown in round 7 you heae many people say Trout won the remainder of the round. I watched it over and over again and I just don't see that. He ate quite a few more shots and gave a few of his own but in no way, shape, or form did he do enough to win it. I think the argument was it could have been 10-9 instead of 10-8. Also the Showtime commentary was oddly in favor of Trouth throughout even through he was losing and was the less popular fighter, what gives? Trout is the American, Canelo the foreigner. It's natural they would lean towards AT. Also, Paulie had a bone to pick with the Texan judging which he felt would be biased.