Vitali Klitschko is 6-0

TKO6? You mean on cuts right? How about TKO2 and KO5? yeah both avenged completely and straight away, unlike the Klit bros losses to even worse fighters and then hiding in fear from such fatboys and retirees. . I have a feeling you haven't even watched the fight. Why don't you catch it on youtube. we didn't have youtube when I watched it, so I have a feeling you are so very wrong again.

you knew it was 37 but wrote 36 because you needed a lie to back up your failing argument. And the winning answer is ....... tko6. being in control until you get knocked the fcuk out isn't really an argument. It just means you failed to defend yourself. Consider, most of Wlads crap opponents these days have him running scared until they are gassed and get KOed, doesn't mean they beat Wlad. Or perhaps you think Wlad has really lost most of is recent defences? TKO6? You mean on cuts right? How about TKO2 and KO5? Both to bums. Not cut losses, straight knock outs. Like glass eyed wobbling, the whole nine yards. Quote from boxrec: Wladimir Klitschko was winning the fight easily but ran out of gas. In round 10 the exhausted Klitschko was knocked down, and in round 11 Puritty kept pounding Klitschko, which caused his trainer Fritz Sdunek to jump into the ring and stop the fight. Not my words there buddy. I have a feeling you haven't even watched the fight. Why don't you catch it on youtube.

im a neutral fan. i had vitali edging lewis at stoppage and was hugely disappointed there was no rematch. Hmmm, that sounds reasonable. Watch out, they may come after you and call you a Klitschko stan or even worse, a klit hugger. :eek:

Dream Fighter, The fact that you brought up size in a discussion about heavyweights destroys any credibility you may have had in this discussion. Learn about the sport you are discussing and then try and contribute.

Unlike any other time in Lewis career, he'd finally met someone who he didn't believe in himself against. He knew he was physically outmatched and that Klitschko wasn't intimidated by him like most other fighters had been. . Well Vitali is good, but not that good. But ....wow you must have Lewis's mobile number if you know what he was thinking. or you are psychic...... Xmen! oh no, my mistake you making **** up. btw, I'd like to add - please try to respond to this calling me a hater since I've just said they are good and i like watching them fight and so expose your own bias you twat...

Lennox wasn't past it, I didn't bother to do math on his exact age when he and Vitali fought. I know it was 36 or 37. you knew it was 37 but wrote 36 because you needed a lie to back up your failing argument. And the winning answer is ....... tko6. Even then, it was like the Brewster fight and was more of a stamina thing than actually getting beaten by a better fighter. Wlad was in total control until he ran out of steam. That's common boxing knowledge. being in control until you get knocked the fcuk out isn't really an argument. It just means you failed to defend yourself. Consider, most of Wlads crap opponents these days have him running scared until they are gassed and get KOed, doesn't mean they beat Wlad. Or perhaps you think Wlad has really lost most of is recent defences?

Like I said, officially, the fight went down as a loss for Klitschko. But, in all the most significant ways, it was a victory. Here's how: After a fight, both fighters cope and deal with the result of the fight. In Lewis case, it's clear that the fallout from this fight left no more room in boxing for him. Lewis was past his prime but still very capable of beating much of the competition out there, and that represented millions of dollars of potential earnings. But, to get to that business, he had to rematch Klitschko and eleviate any doubt that may have existed about who the better of the two was. Unlike any other time in Lewis career, he'd finally met someone who he didn't believe in himself against. He knew he was physically outmatched and that Klitschko wasn't intimidated by him like most other fighters had been. Essentially, Vitali Klitschko ended the career of Lennox Lewis. For Klitschko, the fight, even as an official loss, was a win. The fans wanted a rematch and he was the only fighter willing to make it happen. In fact, even to this day, he's said "I still dream of a rematch with Lennox Lewis." So, since their fight, Klitschko has, for all intents and purposes, been the world's heavyweight champion. He shares that recognition with his brother, who's arguably the more recognized of the two now, and they dominate the heavyweight division. Bottom line: On June 21 , 2003, at the Los Angeles Staples Center, Lennox Lewis suffered a set back in his career while Vitali Klitschko took the first step toward taking what Lennox Lewis had. If you doubt that, go back and watch the post-fight interview with Lennox Lewis and watch how confused, dilluded, and desperate he was in the post-fight interview. Amidst a crowd of booers, Lewis denied that there was any booing going on. He denied that Klitschko was winning the fight, even after being told that the official judges scorecards proved it. It's the only time I've ever seen Lennox Lewis lacking poise and pressence in a post-fight interview. Somehow, he knew that the fight did not go well for him, and he didn't know how to respond. Meanwhile, Klitschko is raising his hands in a moral victory of sorts and the crowd is cheering.

You didn't read the material and yet you know what it was all about. Try being honest first and then we'll talk. That's really the problem all Klitschko haters have, by the way. I don't hate them, indeed I recognize that wlad especially is the man right now and I quite enjoy watching their fights when they have decent opponents ... I just don't have their dicks in my mouth and try to make out that they are gods ... unlike you. Of course for nuthuggers like you me saying I recognize that they are good isn't good enough ... truth is the the Klits would be far more popular around here if their nuthuggers stopped making alts trying to claim they are something they are not and calling anyone who doesn't think they are the GOATS haters. please try to respond to this calling me a hater since I've just said they are good and i like watching them fight and so expose your own bias you twat...

only read the title and not the drivel ... so in response to the title I'll just say whats better 6-0 versus a collection of has beens and never weres. Or 1-0 versus vitali Klitschko? gee ... that's a hard one .... so for the slow amongst ye ... i.e. most of ye ... what's better? Lewis's post 37 year old career or Vitali's? You didn't read the material and yet you know what it was all about. Try being honest first and then we'll talk. That's really the problem all Klitschko haters have, by the way.

im a neutral fan. i had vitali edging lewis at stoppage and was hugely disappointed there was no rematch.

since turning 38, the same age Lennox Lewis was "too old" to honor a rematch with him. For those who don't know, Klitschko and Lewis fought June of 2003 at the Los Angeles Staples Center, and Lewis won by a controversial stoppage after the 6th round. During the fight, Klitschko had Lewis in serious trouble in both the 2nd and 3rd rounds, and was leading on all three judges scorecards 4 rounds to 2. Further more, Klitschko had a decisive edge in punch stats, landing significantly more jabs, power punches, and total punches. Further more, the general perception of analysts and ringside observers was that Lewis was lucky to avoid defeat in this contest: "Vitali was winning the fight, Lewis got lucky. There has to a rematch!" -- George Foreman "A lucky escape for Lennox Lewis, who was clearly losing the fight." -- Jim Lampley After the fight, both fighters, analysts, and the fans in general started clamouring for, and even demanding, a rematch: "I'm happy to give him a rematch because I will bust up the other side of his face as well." -- Lennox Lewis "I proved tonight that I can beat Lennox Lewis. I want a rematch." -- Vitali Klitschko With his own verbal commitment to a rematch, and all the pressure from the media and fans to provide one, Lennox Lewis, who had designs on fighting for several more years, was faced with a dilemma: Rematch or retire. Despite Lewis earlier indications that he intended on continuing his career for some time, his tune now changed and he was leaning more toward retirement. Even with all the negative publicity that Lewis suffered as a result of this fight, and the significant amount of money he stood to make in a rematch (reportedly as much as 40 million dollars), Lewis opted to retire and not risk another tough fight with the physically superior Klitschko. Lennox Lewis was 38 years old at the time. Vitali Klitschko has now fought 4 years past that age, has over 10 title defenses of a major world title, and has become one of boxing's most envied, loved, hated, and richest fighters in the world. Life is good for Vitali Klitschko, even if he couldn't get Lewis back in the ring to settle the score. only read the title and not the drivel ... so in response to the title I'll just say whats better 6-0 versus a collection of has beens and never weres. Or 1-0 versus vitali Klitschko? gee ... that's a hard one .... so for the slow amongst ye ... i.e. most of ye ... what's better? Lewis's post 37 year old career or Vitali's?

Now you can't even check his age properly. Fluke cut... :chairshot btw, it was cuts. As in plural. Not cut. Lennox wasn't past it, I didn't bother to do math on his exact age when he and Vitali fought. I know it was 36 or 37. Either way, it's petty because he was not shot as some of you like to throw out there. That's an easy cop out to undermind Vitali's beating him then losing on a cut. Oh, and yes, the singular cut that stopped the fight was the larger one above the eye. The cut under his eye had no bearing on his vision. Try watching the fight, then talking sh*t. Pianeta stunk so much you, a Klitschko fan girl can't even spell his name correctly. Who gives two sh*ts how to spell his name? You knew who I meant right? That's all that matters. At leasy he had not lost to a dozen club fighters before his title shot. Plus, I know guys like you.. No, you have no clue who I am. This is the internet, tough guy. If you knew me in person, this conversation wouldn't have lasted this long. You take one look at their record and think they're ****. Wepner wasn't that good, but both him and Chuvalo were tough sons a b!tches. As Chuvalo used to say: "I may have tasted defeat, but I never tasted the canvas". Oh, now I get it. As long as you don't get knocked down, you're still an awesome fighter even if you lose a dozen fights to club fighters? Ahh, okay. I'll try and remember that one. I've been looking at this all wrong this whole time. That must mean the Kevin Johnson win for Vitali and then Fury was just uber impressive. He has never been down either. The point being, just because they are durable, don't make them good fighters. They were bums in that era and would be today as well. Plus, didn't Wlad lose to a guy with more than 20 losses on his résumé? Whoops. I didn't just pull that out did I? Yes I did. Listen to yourself, you sound like a kid getting all upset and on the playground & stuff. Not that it matters but when Wlad was beaten by him, he had 14 losses. Even then, it was like the Brewster fight and was more of a stamina thing than actually getting beaten by a better fighter. Wlad was in total control until he ran out of steam. That's common boxing knowledge. In closing , I would like to say it was good bickering with you, but in good concious, I can't. It's horrible talking to somebody that you simply can't talk and reason into. It always leads to a dead end. -the last word.

one year layoff isnt that big a deal. hell vitali came back impressively after 4 years off. anyway,,I know lewis was past his best but he wasnt a shot fighter. I think even the biggest lewis supporters know this deep down but are sick of hearing from the klit huggers Vitali took 4 years off when the only guy he'd ever fought that was truly top class was Lewis. He hadn't had a long hard career. Vitali came back after 4 years with plenty left to prove. Lewis had nothing left to prove and only came back for a paycheque or two.

The Tyson fight was over a year before the Vitali fight. Lewis had basically come out of retirement. one year layoff isnt that big a deal. hell vitali came back impressively after 4 years off. anyway,,I know lewis was past his best but he wasnt a shot fighter. I think even the biggest lewis supporters know this deep down but are sick of hearing from the klit huggers

lol,,saying he was a shot corpse is every bit as stupid as saying lewis was at his peak and in good condition. he was coming off an impressive showing against tyson. its not like he looked terrible in previous fights. he was a bit past his best and not in his best shape. end of story The Tyson fight was over a year before the Vitali fight. Lewis had basically come out of retirement.

It was so close by the end of the 6th round.. the scorecards was meaningless. For hardcore Lewis fans who watched the fight numerous times.. we can tell you that there was actually a swing round or two.. which could realistically make the cards 3-3 or 4-2 Lewis.. It really doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is: old shot corpse version of Lennox Lewis stopped Prime Vitali in 6 rounds. Prime Lennox Lewis will utterly and completely beat up Prime Vitali. I wish to God the fight had continued so Vitali's eye falls out.. this way we can all hear about how Lennox made Vitali blind. lol,,saying he was a shot corpse is every bit as stupid as saying lewis was at his peak and in good condition. he was coming off an impressive showing against tyson. its not like he looked terrible in previous fights. he was a bit past his best and not in his best shape. end of story

dont even try cause I won't even answer... Please keep that way. As a favour to everyone on NSB.

I fixed that for you a bit. Now it's accurate. Now you can't even check his age properly. Fluke cut... :chairshot btw, it was cuts. As in plural. Not cut. Interesting opinion other than the fact that those two guys were still losing to club fighters consistently while Pianetta and Charr were not. They may be lesser fighters but at least they didn't lose tens of fights and get a title shot. Those two were utterly plodding punching bags and half of the division now would sh*t all over them. I must make some sense to you somewhere in there. Pianeta stunk so much you, a Klitschko fan girl can't even spell his name correctly. Plus, I know guys like you. You take one look at their record and think they're ****. Wepner wasn't that good, but both him and Chuvalo were tough sons a b!tches. As Chuvalo used to say: "I may have tasted defeat, but I never tasted the canvas". Plus, didn't Wlad lose to a guy with more than 20 losses on his résumé? Whoops. I didn't just pull that out did I? Yes I did.

Dude.. Just stop it, dont even try cause I won't even answer...

You're an ALT. In fact, pretty sure half the posters in here are ALTs. By alt do you mean alternative account? If so, this is my only account. I just so happen to be very seasoned on boxing conversation. What are you and Alt to?