Alexander talking made trash about Khan and Brook..

I was able to understand every word he said.When they interview Khan and many other boxers I can't understand what they are saying. I think he will have no problem beating Khan and will probably win by KO.

^^agreed!!^^

True...they were magnified in that fight though. I was shocked at how bad his defence and infighting was after that fight whereas before I was just shocked at how bad his chin and timing were. Khan has never been able to move from amateur style to a professional one, he isn't the greatest thinker in the ring neither, he has the flashy hand speed and occasional jab but everything else is still amateurish.

Khan limitations were exposed way before Pederson. True...they were magnified in that fight though. I was shocked at how bad his defence and infighting was after that fight whereas before I was just shocked at how bad his chin and timing were.

I was right then, Peterson did admit to using in the first fight, thanks for clarifying. That fight did expose Khans limitations though.....it wasn't the fact that Peterson was on PED's that Khan has no defence or is unable to fight on the inside, his performances after that show the same things. Khan limitations were exposed way before Pederson.

I don't put people on ignore, but will ignore your stupid ass from now on. I will leave you with this. Let's just add words into what others say shall we. It doesn't change the context at all. I fuc ked a someone at college today! I ****ed a 13 year old at college today! Thanks for the pointless post.I've already told you i know his opinion on this matter,I don't have to add,I know that's how he feels cause he's said as much..Guess you missed that tho..lol oh boy..

It's not about changing the outcome. Nothing will change the draw on Lennox Lewis' record against Holyfield but everyone KNOWS in their own head what happened. To literally go against your own opinion makes you sound like an absolute fuking spaz. None of this is "fact" or "law". LOL@ LAW You said it was Team Khan's spin about Peterson being on PEDs. A record is fact, who you thought won the fight is an opinion..Oh based on the rules of boxing the judges who are elected to score a fight(weather you agree or not) are law..Ask Lara..

I see now, so Dirk makes the rules of boxing more..So when the rules state that the three judges elected will be the ones to choose the winner they were just talking out their asses..I see thanks for that Dirr really good stuff.. Lol..:crazy: Fans and historians ignore official judging all the time. No one cares that Chavez has a draw with Whitaker or Lara lost to Williams, because we know it isn't true.

No it is not the same thing. He said Khan should have won on points anyway. If you are going to quote someone, quote word for word. Why add clearly when he did not type it? You just put a word in his mouth by adding clearly. Also it came across that his main point was, a failed drugs test anyway, which you totally ignored for some reason. I don't like you because it is a feeling that as a human, we are capable of. It may be a boxing forum, it could be on a pokemon forum or a gay forum, it doesn't matter. I have read your posts and you clearly are bias and have an agenda when it comes to certain boxers. You are delusional and often argue a case strongly, and sometimes even wrongly according to many other peoples opinion. As Haye stated, it's hard to argue with an idiot because they will beat you on experience. You talking made ****. Well hopefully you'll put me on ignore or won't respond to me if this is the case..Why waste ya time right..:fing02:

Pederson admitted to being on PED for the first Khan fight. So anything else is irrelevant... The boxer HIMSELF admit to being on drugs. I was right then, Peterson did admit to using in the first fight, thanks for clarifying. That fight did expose Khans limitations though.....it wasn't the fact that Peterson was on PED's that Khan has no defence or is unable to fight on the inside, his performances after that show the same things.

I agree with this. It was a fight that could've gone either way and Khan deserved the point deduction for his constant fouling. The peterson fight exposed Khan's inability to fight on the inside and his non existant defence. Peterson only tested positive in the build up to the rematch but I'm sure he or someone in his camp admitted to using the same synthetic testosterone (or whatever it was) in the first fight?! I'm fasting today and forgetting all the facts....somone correct me, can't be arsed with google! I love watching Khan though, it's guaranteed excitement and his speed/cumulative power makes him dangerous to most World titlists. Unfortunately his weaknesses means he'll never reach the elite level. I do think he has the perfect style to beat Broner convincingly. Pederson admitted to being on PED for the first Khan fight. So anything else is irrelevant... The boxer HIMSELF admit to being on drugs.

I did not say "Team Khan caused Peterson to fail a drugs test". There is no way that you could justify jumping to that conclusion from anything I have written. Peterson did not fail a drug test in the first fight,he did in the build up to the rematch. Regardless of Peterson being on PEDs or not in the first fight Khan's performance was shoddy where he exposed him limitations. That was the point I was making. If the first fight was made a no contest and wiped out a L that is fine by me but Khan's performance in that fight was awful. I agree with this. It was a fight that could've gone either way and Khan deserved the point deduction for his constant fouling. The peterson fight exposed Khan's inability to fight on the inside and his non existant defence. Peterson only tested positive in the build up to the rematch but I'm sure he or someone in his camp admitted to using the same synthetic testosterone (or whatever it was) in the first fight?! I'm fasting today and forgetting all the facts....somone correct me, can't be arsed with google! I love watching Khan though, it's guaranteed excitement and his speed/cumulative power makes him dangerous to most World titlists. Unfortunately his weaknesses means he'll never reach the elite level. I do think he has the perfect style to beat Broner convincingly.

Devon is too nice to be trash talking, he just can't IMO. He should leave that to his ghetto trainer.

I did not say "Team Khan caused Peterson to fail a drugs test". There is no way that you could justify jumping to that conclusion from anything I have written. Peterson did not fail a drug test in the first fight,he did in the build up to the rematch. Regardless of Peterson being on PEDs or not in the first fight Khan's performance was shoddy where he exposed his limitations. That was the point I was making. If the first fight was made a no contest and wiped out a L that is fine by me but Khan's performance in that fight was awful. that was the point I was making. Beating a man who is hopped up on PEDs is a pretty impressive performance by most people's standards

It's not about changing the outcome. Nothing will change the draw on Lennox Lewis' record against Holyfield but everyone KNOWS in their own head what happened. To literally go against your own opinion makes you sound like an absolute fuking spaz. None of this is "fact" or "law". LOL@ LAW You said it was Team Khan's spin about Peterson being on PEDs. I see now, so Dirk makes the rules of boxing more..So when the rules state that the three judges elected will be the ones to choose the winner they were just talking out their asses..I see thanks for that Dirr really good stuff.. Lol..:crazy:

No it is not the same thing. He said Khan should have won on points anyway. If you are going to quote someone, quote word for word. Why add clearly when he did not type it? You just put a word in his mouth by adding clearly. Also it came across that his main point was, a failed drugs test anyway, which you totally ignored for some reason. I don't like you because it is a feeling that as a human, we are capable of. It may be a boxing forum, it could be on a pokemon forum or a gay forum, it doesn't matter. I have read your posts and you clearly are bias and have an agenda when it comes to certain boxers. You are delusional and often argue a case strongly, and sometimes even wrongly according to many other peoples opinion. As Haye stated, it's hard to argue with an idiot because they will beat you on experience. You talking made ****. Of course he ignores the drug issue. He has Shane "EPO" Mosley as the 5th best fighter ever :lol1:

LMAO,so Dirk in which fight did your almighty opinion change the outcome??I'll wait..:lol1: It's not about changing the outcome. Nothing will change the draw on Lennox Lewis' record against Holyfield but everyone KNOWS in their own head what happened. To literally go against your own opinion makes you sound like an absolute fuking spaz. None of this is "fact" or "law". LOL@ LAW Where did I write that? That is your invention. You said it was Team Khan's spin about Peterson being on PEDs.

Going off Alexander's one loss and the way in which he lost, I like Khan to out tough him. Alexander seemed to quit against Bradley. Having said that, Alexander has looked better than Khan in his recent performances. Khan - Diaz was worrying. Khan was in survival mode against a career Lightweight from the 4th round. Maybe the step up to welterweight will help his punch resistence in the way his initial move to light welter did. I like Khan in this fight, think he's more skilled, obvioulsy faster and IMO has more heart. As for Kell, not sure he'll cut it in the big leagues...he's got time to prove me wrong though.

Oh wow :lol1: LMAO,so Dirk in which fight did your almighty opinion change the outcome??I'll wait..:lol1:

I agree. Good post He said Khan should have won on points, he didn't say clearly. Now I remember why I dislike you. You are a bias tool who then ends up saying **** like 'I guess that was a lucky punch as well'. You're trying to put words into peoples mouths. Please stop being a fool. Is this not the same thing..Unless he said(or suggested)that the fight could have went either way,which he obviously was not doing..Then he was suggesting that Khan clearly won the fight,which imo is a joke.. I don't have to put words into peoples mouths..This is what he's suggested before..Dumb shhit like this..My dude I really don't even know who the fucck you are..So I really don't know why you would not like me..It's strange that you would have any feelings about me in general being we're just talking boxing.. I'm bias about what??Explain?