Teddy Atlas kept it real about Adrien Broner...

:lol1: What response do you expect? "God damn it!! I'm a Broner hater and I thought he lost against Malignaggi but my number one idol, Teddy Atlas, said that Broner won easy. I guess I'll go kill myself now." :dunce: What a stupid fucking thread. Exactly. Thread making should have it's own rep, too many troll/bait threads on NSB.

Got damn, everyone knew that coming into the fight that Paulie was not going to KO or even stun Broner. If the shot landed then the shot landed. Paulie outlanded Broner even though they didn't hurt him he still tagged him. What did you morons expect? Paulie to KO Broner? Get real and look at who out landed who, who showed better defensive skills, and who took control of the fight. Paulie hit all those check points. Not giving Paulie a nod for a win cuz of his punching power is absurd cuz we knew he didn't have it coming into the fight for goodness sake.

Neither is Malignaggi really. Size had nothing to do with his mediocre performance. Good post.

He's not a natural welter either. Neither is Malignaggi really. Size had nothing to do with his mediocre performance.

Broner is not a Junior Lightweight. He was clearly too big for that division which is why he missed weight and lost his title. He came in the ring at 150 for his lightweight fights. Stop making stupid excuses for his lacklustre performance. He's not a natural welter either.

You got me on that one. I forgot Khan began his career at Lightweight. With that said, the fact still remains Broner is naturally smaller than Khan, Cotto and Paulie. Broner is not a Junior Lightweight. He was clearly too big for that division which is why he missed weight and lost his title. He came in the ring at 150 for his lightweight fights. Stop making stupid excuses for his lacklustre performance.

Paulie began his career at lightweight. Khan did also. Get a pencil and paper so you can write it down and remember that. :lol1: You got me on that one. I forgot Khan began his career at Lightweight. With that said, the fact still remains Broner is naturally smaller than Khan, Cotto and Paulie.

He has a habit of making mistakes which for a so called boxing expert isn't really acceptable. Didn't he say hatton would beat Pac? So not only is he not good at predicting fight outcomes. He may also not be a great judge. Yeah, I felt they all just backed their own pre-fight predictions of Broner domination. Broner plays to the journalists too, he is their jester, they like him. Ted Atlas had to back his pre-fight predictions, ie, a mismatched fight in Broner's favor. Otherwise, he would like like a fool as usual. It was in no way a dominating win for Broner. I would bet that if the judges gave it to Paulie, not a lot of fans would complain. It looked like the judges didn't count Paulie's millions of body shots on Broner.

He's human, he can also make mistakes, and this time saying that Broner won "easy" is a big mistake. He has a habit of making mistakes which for a so called boxing expert isn't really acceptable. Didn't he say hatton would beat Pac? So not only is he not good at predicting fight outcomes. He may also not be a great judge.

I'm a huge Broner hater. I think the sport is better off without him. But that doesn't mean I can't call a fight like I see it. I think Broner won ten of the twelve rounds. Sometimes a fighter can be just a little bit better than their opponent.... and they do it round after round. So in my opinion (which should never count for much), it should have been 118-110 for Broner; not because he was phenomenally better... because he was slightly better on a very consistent basis.

Paulie made this fight close..He lost it imo,but I can see an argument for a draw..A Paulie win is a hard one to swing,Paulie was busy and at times controlling the fight..Not enough tho for me to give him the win..

Basically Paulie lost to a Jr Lightweight. Khan and Cotto began their careers at 140. Broner is a little guy compared to those two. Paulie began his career at lightweight. Khan did also. Get a pencil and paper so you can write it down and remember that. :lol1:

Basically Paulie lost to a Jr Lightweight. Khan and Cotto began their careers at 140. Broner is a little guy compared to those two. Let GGG climb up two weight classes and beat Nathan Cleverly in his first fight at light heavy This forum would be offline for weeks. GGG fans would claim GGG is better than Calzaghe. They would claim GOAT status for him. Broner actually does accomplish this feat and the majority of internet fans criticize him. Too bad his last name ain't Morales or Povetkin. He'd get nonstop love then. Its all good though. People will hate this kid into a cash cow.

Atlas is wrong. Again. Hes wrong alot lately. Maybe hes getting old. How was he wrong on this one ? He pointed out exactly what happened in the ring. Soft ineffective punches should not score points. Broner may not have looked his best but he won that fight clearly.

People generally don't know how to score fights period.

You need a pencil and a piece of paper to score a fight? :lol1: Counting rounds too taxing for your pretty little head, cupcake? I'd rather write it down like the judges than go off memory and guess who won.

Like I said, anybody who scores that fight for Paulie don't know WTF they are looking at.

8-4 Broner, he didn't force the action as much as he should have but you can take a title when the champ boxes on the run. Paulie didn't want to exchange and thats fine but he landed his jabs to the midsection other than that the punches didn't land often and they had NOTHING on them! People expected more from Broner and less from Paulie so Paukies fans think it was close! The rounds got very repetitive and it was getting boring and thats on Broner for not stepping up the action! No rematch, one 12 round bore is enough! Ray

He beat Paulie but I don't think it was easy. If you judge who landed the harder punches, it was Broner no doubt. Paulie though, out worked him and made many rounds close.

Broner won 116-112. I wouldn't say it was all that easy, but scores for Paulie are pretty silly in my opinion. And I was going for Paulie.