Floyd Mayweather ATG or ATD (all time duck)?

Floyd Mayweather will never be considered an ATG at least not in the level of the Alie's, Patterson's or even Haglers. He will always be known as the guy that knew how to avoid dangerous fighters in their prime and avoid others altogether!!! Once he takes a loss Floyd will be worth nothing. Wow! That's kind of harsh don't you think.:wtf1:

Mayweather demanding a catchweight for Alvarez, after bashing Pacquiao for fighting at catchweights, shows he's a hypocrite no ring warrior. He is constantly contradicting himself when he is scared of his opponent like when he said they asked Pac about fighting him and Pac responded they would have to talk to his promoter and Floyd was saying Pac was scared because of his response. And that is almost always the response that Floyd gives when he is asked the same question about a fighter he is scared of.

I agree that Mayweather thinks because he's done all he's done without losing, he's the greatest of all time. To me, that's all in his head. He's an all time great but not with other fighters in the upper echelons of the sport's history. It is all in his head and maybe a couple of Floyd Mayweather lovers that think just because he is undefeated that makes him ATG. Maybe top 50 but that's about it.

I think he thinks just because he is undefeated that makes him the greatest ever. Losses are so overrated. IIRC SRR lost 19 times. La Motta lost about 19 times. Basilio lost like 12 times. Really good but not an ATG. I agree that Mayweather thinks because he's done all he's done without losing, he's the greatest of all time. To me, that's all in his head. He's an all time great but not with other fighters in the upper echelons of the sport's history.

Floyd Mayweather will never be considered an ATG at least not in the level of the Alie's, Patterson's or even Haglers. He will always be known as the guy that knew how to avoid dangerous fighters in their prime and avoid others altogether!!! Once he takes a loss Floyd will be worth nothing.

Floyd has an atg skills to compensate his good but not atg worthy resume. Come on just take a deep look at his resume. Baldomir, Gatti, Ortiz and Guerrero were good wins but nothing special. His worthy atg status wins came from beating past prime fighters like Oscar, Mosley, Cotto and bloated Hatton and Marquez. Except Marquez, we know pretty well the rest Pac sent them to hell and retirements. Can't argue with this, it's what will always haunt his legacy.

Floyd has an atg skills to compensate his good but not atg worthy resume. Come on just take a deep look at his resume. Baldomir, Gatti, Ortiz and Guerrero were good wins but nothing special. His worthy atg status wins came from beating past prime fighters like Oscar, Mosley, Cotto and bloated Hatton and Marquez. Except Marquez, we know pretty well the rest Pac sent them to hell and retirements.

yeah if he loses it will be even worse. It will expose his cherry picking hard I always wondered what will happen to Floyd selling power if he loses.

If he goes 49 or 50-0 and continues with all the named guys for his last few bouts he will get his just due. Just look at Broner. Haters and fans alike get defensive when you compare the two. Broner is so..........not at Floyd's level it actually makes you appreciate Floyd more lol. Na ur a jock sniffer so everything just makes u appreciate Floyd more even something that has nothing to do with him.

the truth is, floyd undefeated record would not be the focus of his legacy. if you decipher the history of all atg’s in the sport of boxing, historian and boxing fans rely more on the quality of opponents and fighting style. floyd will be more remembered as a fighter with skills (boring style) but lacks the balls to fight worthy opponents. floyd will come way short to even be included in the top 50 atg's. floyd quacks a lot, so he is a duck. yeah if he loses it will be even worse. It will expose his cherry picking hard

I actually laughed at ATG and Floyd being put in the same sentence.

he ain't nothing but a catchweight fighter (Marquez, Augustus, Canelo...) he'll probably have some more catchweight fights before he retires (again) A lot of people say Angustus was not a CW fight.

floyd is considered a very good fighter if you compare him to c-class level of fighters. but on a b-level fighters he's categorize as mediocre. so, he won't even be mentioned with the class-a fighters with the likes of ali, pac... LMAO at pac as a class A fighter, dude please!!!!!!!

He might have a shot. But I don't see him cracking top 10 status with his resume as of now. Talent, skill? No argument here. Still has time, and fights left though. If he goes 49 or 50-0 and continues with all the named guys for his last few bouts he will get his just due. Just look at Broner. Haters and fans alike get defensive when you compare the two. Broner is so..........not at Floyd's level it actually makes you appreciate Floyd more lol.

the truth is, floyd undefeated record would not be the focus of his legacy. if you decipher the history of all atg’s in the sport of boxing, historian and boxing fans rely more on the quality of opponents and fighting style. floyd will be more remembered as a fighter with skills (boring style) but lacks the balls to fight worthy opponents. floyd will come way short to even be included in the top 50 atg's. floyd quacks a lot, so he is a duck. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ funny!:rofl:

He is a great talent but will be on the same level as a tyson, roy jones, in terms of ATG Just too many missed big fights.. You can say guys dodged floyd which may be true early in his career but since the oscar fight he has been the #1 draw in boxing, and when you are the #1 draw in boxing like ali, srl, tyson, oscar, you can make any fight you want... Oscar had no problem making the ike, mosely, tito, vargas, hopkins, floyd, manny fights Srl fought Duran, hearns, hagler... Ali fought frazier, norton, foreman, young, lyles, holmes, liston, etc Floyd will go down with a slightly better resume and success than roy jones and tyson... But way too many missed opportunities since the oscar fight....

the truth is, floyd undefeated record would not be the focus of his legacy. if you decipher the history of all atg’s in the sport of boxing, historian and boxing fans rely more on the quality of opponents and fighting style. floyd will be more remembered as a fighter with skills (boring style) but lacks the balls to fight worthy opponents. floyd will come way short to even be included in the top 50 atg's. floyd quacks a lot, so he is a duck.

You took alot of time to write a bait OP for a bait thread, can't take anyone seriously who wants to discuss someone's legacy in seriousness and then puts a joke like "ATD" in the title. But I will humor the audience and respond as if you were actually a rational and serious boxing fan. I consider Floyd an ATG, but not on the level of Ali or Robinson, one of the greatest mistakes of a younger generation in any generation, is they assume that the greatest in their era automatically would be the greatest in any era, and in the sport of boxing that's so far from the truth, I have to question your boxing knowledge. It wasn't for anybody to take it that serious but I guess you did.

A lot of people on Boxing scene and other media outlets are always arguing about the legitimacy of Floyd being numero uno (number one) P4P. Floyd himself has said that he believes he is as good as the Ali's, Patersons, and Robinson's. If you ask the AKA Floyd haters they will point out that he is not worthy of ATG like the above mentioned, he doesn't deserve to be considered in that level, because they will point out that he is actually an ATD (all timeduck), (ok I just made up the ATD thing) but you know what I mean. Why do they say this because according to the Floyd haters or doubters, he has avoided the likes of Pacquiao, Paul Williams, Margarito, and avoided fighting others in their prime Cotto, Mosley, De La Hoya, fought Zab only because he lost a split decision to Baldomir and cheating others on the scales (Marquez). Did he avoid these fighters? Did Floyd avoid fighting some of these guys in their prime? I don't know, no body can say that with 100% certainty because there is no solid proof of that, even though there are some pretty good videos on places like youtube to support it. The Floyd fans or AKA flo mos ( I'm sorry I'm not the one making these names up but lol!) they would point out that Floyd as we all know is undefeated 44-0-26ko. They will also point out his impressive resume that sports big names like Robert Guerrero, Miguel Cotto, Victor Ortiz, Shane Mosley, Juan Manuel Marquez, Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya, and those are his last seven fights in that order. His fans will also point out that Floyd is the number one attraction, the number one cash cow, brings the most revenue and sells the most pay per views. They claim he is the face of boxing and has been for about a decade. The only thing there is no proof of for them is that he will fight any one at any time no matter how big the threat is to his beloved “0”. I know where I stand. I have to admit that even though I hold a question mark over his head, I have enjoyed watching him fight in the ring or in interviews. Floyd has made great moments for me, my friends and family and I love him for that. Some times I root for him (Ricky Hatton fight) some times I root against him (Cotto fight) but that's my choice. I don't hate Floyd Mayweather and to tell you the truth I don't hate the people that get on boxing scene to hate on any fighter, I think it's very exciting. Just keep out the disrespectful name calling PLEASE. We are not children and you don't want to be a key board warrior. So where does Floyd Mayweather stand in “YOUR OPINION” ? My opinion is that he is an ATG and he has made some very good money choices that some might hold against him. Greatest of all time? NO, but I would dare say his legacy is written in stone and he is in the top 20. You took alot of time to write a bait OP for a bait thread, can't take anyone seriously who wants to discuss someone's legacy in seriousness and then puts a joke like "ATD" in the title. But I will humor the audience and respond as if you were actually a rational and serious boxing fan. I consider Floyd an ATG, but not on the level of Ali or Robinson, one of the greatest mistakes of a younger generation in any generation, is they assume that the greatest in their era automatically would be the greatest in any era, and in the sport of boxing that's so far from the truth, I have to question your boxing knowledge.

he's an all time great. there will never ever be anybody as good as mayweather jr. there already has been, see whitaker and roy jones jr for proof.