Carl Froch

I have to agree with one thing.. I cringe everytime he throws a combination... he makes the Pacquiao Noise... and his combinations are SO SLOW that its shocking... any fighter with a little movement easily beats him. No one can question the fact that he brings it... No Doubt

Obvious troll is obvious

I think Martin Murray would beat his ass. Cleverly, Degale, Macklin, Barker. I'm not hating, I'm just calling it how I see it. Kessler was tagging the **** out of him. He talks **** about Ward is a spoiler. What the **** does that mean? He just stood his ground in the pocket and beat you the **** up. Dude is sloppy as **** and overrated as ****. Talking about Calzaghe; what the **** Calzaghe was an excellent boxer. LMFAO you can't be serious with this. I can see why you're in the red.

http://i.minus.com/iULazvXJjwXFM.gif lmao, tis true though, the alt OP deserves a neg bukkake

If Froch isn't that good, why is Ward so highly regarded? Ward's win over mediocre Froch obviously means nothing in your world, so what has Ward done otherwise? If Andre is p4p top 2-3 right now, a win over Froch must have been a bit of a deal, no?

I think Martin Murray would beat his ass. Cleverly, Degale, Macklin, Barker. I'm not hating, I'm just calling it how I see it. Kessler was tagging the **** out of him. He talks **** about Ward is a spoiler. What the **** does that mean? He just stood his ground in the pocket and beat you the **** up. Dude is sloppy as **** and overrated as ****. Talking about Calzaghe; what the **** Calzaghe was an excellent boxer. Macklin and Barker are struggling at Middleweight a division south of Froch. De Gale but not Groves? I assume ur a Groves hater too then yeah. Either way neither one is ready for Froch. Martin Murray is a good fighter but there's no special effects with him and Froch is simply bigger and better. Ward is an excellent fighter and better than Froch yes but there is no shame in being a lesser boxer than Andre Ward. Calzaghe was a biitch

http://i.minus.com/iULazvXJjwXFM.gif

I see what you're saying, but 3 out of his last 8 opponents have gotten the better of him. 2 of them have made him look like complete ****, yet he touts himself as some sort of great when he is just an average fighter. I respect that he has gone as far as he has with his limited skills, but he is not that good, let alone great.

All you guys talk about is granite chin, exciting, blah, blah blah. He gets hit way too much, because he is not good. He is defensively inept, his footwork is horrible. I just watched this Kessler fight right now. I though Kessler won it; he did the better work. He had him staggered all of the place and he is supposed to be elite? GTFOH with that bull****. I like boxing and I enjoy skills; which he is obviously lacking. I know that is not the best the UK has to offer, because I watch a lot of UK fighters. But this dude talks himself up as a great, however I have yet to see anything that is above average about him. Really? Prepare for immediate humiliation.

This again? It's amazing how he's managed to go in the run he has over the past 5 or 6 years despite being so crap. He's unorthodox but he's effective. He isn't the most gifted fighter you'll ever see but if you watch him closely he's better than he's sometimes given credit for. He's good at controlling distance, his long arms and casual style means the can throw punches from angles other fighters can't. His long arms can make it difficult for him to fight on the inside which makes his ability to keep fights on the outside even more important. His foofwork isn't the best and he can look clumbsy, and bad at times but he's found a stlye that works for him and although you won't see it in any 'boxing training manual' it works for him and not many fights have been able to get the better of him.

Call me mad, say i don't know **** about Boxing. but i love watching Carl Froch fight. And i don't understand why any Boxing fan wouldn't.

All you guys talk about is granite chin, exciting, blah, blah blah. He gets hit way too much, because he is not good. He is defensively inept, his footwork is horrible. I just watched this Kessler fight right now. I though Kessler won it; he did the better work. He had him staggered all of the place and he is supposed to be elite? GTFOH with that bull****. I like boxing and I enjoy skills; which he is obviously lacking. I know that is not the best the UK has to offer, because I watch a lot of UK fighters. But this dude talks himself up as a great, however I have yet to see anything that is above average about him.

Dude landed 25% of his punched against Kessler. He cant setup a combination to save his life. In my opinion he just is not good.

I think Martin Murray would beat his ass. Cleverly, Degale, Macklin, Barker. I'm not hating, I'm just calling it how I see it. Kessler was tagging the **** out of him. He talks **** about Ward is a spoiler. What the **** does that mean? He just stood his ground in the pocket and beat you the **** up. Dude is sloppy as **** and overrated as ****. Talking about Calzaghe; what the **** Calzaghe was an excellent boxer.

http://x.vukajlija.com/var/uploads/reactions/201206/5669/boring.gif

Quit hating, the guys a Beast. Which British fighters beat him easy???

I don't see what the hype is with this dude. He has horrible defense, sloppy footwork and loses when he really steps up. He has beaten Jermain Taylor; who was a shot fighter. Andre Dirrell, Andre Ward and Mikell Kessler beat his ass, then he beat an exposed Arthur Abraham old and shot Glen Johnson, hyped up Lucien Bute who was knocked out by Librado Andrade, club fighter Yusaf Mack and now tied up with score with Mikell Kessler. I think Kessler is a good fighter, but the fight with Froch could have gone either way. Dude is far from humble and a lot of British fighters at the moment would beat him easy. I personally don't need to see a Ward rematch, because Froch has not made any improvements. We all know what the result will be. yes. your alt-head on a stick, I expect.