I gave round 1 to Mayweather. When the bell rang, you could clearly see both fighters take one step forward. That's a smart move, because taking a step backwards would not be smart. It wouldn't be smart because then you have nowhere to go, your back will be against your corner. That makes it even easier for your opponent. So good work for both guys to take a step forward. Mayweather took that first step forward with more confidence, so I think he takes the round.
this dude is full of himeself, he says he has boxing calling him, trainers asking how he knows these magic tricks LMFAO.
Dude is lame, he closed his youtube account cause he got a copyright infringement notice and lost his adsense money, then now he moved to vimeo and he plans to open a membership site hoping people will pay for his insight dude a dumbass.
No one wants to hear your dumbass talk 40 minutes about one damn round acting like you know everything nukka!
When his yt channel shut down I thought it was because of copyright. But then he said he decided to take it down. So what you said makes sense and I can't blame him if he took it down because he can't get Adsense
1) Sorry but this guy is super bias. In round 6 with about 40 seconds left he is saying that Castillo hasn't landed any punches and Floyd has. What?
2) How many times does he have to use the excuse that Floyd just came up to 135 and Castillo weighed more than him?
3) How many times does he have to say that Floyd was injured?
4) He is saying that its better with the sound off. Right? But if instead we hear his bias commenting, well isn't that worse????
5) When CompuBox agrees with him, he says "see I was right" then when Compubox states that Castillo connected more often he starts questioning Combubox .... no consistency!
6) So Castillo is moving forward and being aggressive but "BarryRobinson" tries to convince us that if the other guy Floyd is retreating, "shouldn't we give Floyd credit for all his work in the gym and hours of running" ..... WHAT????
7) This guy thru 6 rounds can't manage to give Castillo a round. What????
8) He often states that Castillo did nothing much in the round BUT even when Floyd doesn't do much, he gives him the credit and easily gives him the round.
While I'm OK with the sound off as far as removing the commentating, I still see a flaw in that. That is, there is still something that is lost by doing that. For one, you need to see and HEAR the punches connecting to get more of an understanding of how hard that punch was that landed.
ether x10..................
1) Sorry but this guy is super bias. In round 6 with about 40 seconds left he is saying that Castillo hasn't landed any punches and Floyd has. What?
2) How many times does he have to use the excuse that Floyd just came up to 135 and Castillo weighed more than him?
3) How many times does he have to say that Floyd was injured?
4) He is saying that its better with the sound off. Right? But if instead we hear his bias commenting, well isn't that worse????
5) When CompuBox agrees with him, he says "see I was right" then when Compubox states that Castillo connected more often he starts questioning Combubox .... no consistency!
6) So Castillo is moving forward and being aggressive but "BarryRobinson" tries to convince us that if the other guy Floyd is retreating, "shouldn't we give Floyd credit for all his work in the gym and hours of running" ..... WHAT????
7) This guy thru 6 rounds can't manage to give Castillo a round. What????
8) He often states that Castillo did nothing much in the round BUT even when Floyd doesn't do much, he gives him the credit and easily gives him the round.
While I'm OK with the sound off as far as removing the commentating, I still see a flaw in that. That is, there is still something that is lost by doing that. For one, you need to see and HEAR the punches connecting to get more of an understanding of how hard that punch was that landed.
So you are saying people mention the Corrales fight more than the mention the Floyd fight?
I never said who u "think" of. I clearly said which fight gets mentioned the most
The classic war with Chico.
the worst thing about his videos is how brilliant he makes himself out to be. He made a long meandering video about golovkin that he finished off by saying "now you golovkin fans have something intelligent to say about him", like he was after decoding the rosetta stone.
And what were his groundbreaking findings? That golovkin has good footwork, is a technically high quality striker, and applies intelligent pressure.
Bravo professor, you basically repeated what everyone says about the guy the first time they watch him. Luckily for us, most of those people didn't bother to make a 20 minute self-congratulatory video about it.
ether....................
How am I trolling by saying Castillo gets mentioned the most when Floyd is involved. when someone starts a Mayweather-Castillo thread every other week. Or if someone says Floyd is undefeated, someone immediately points to the Castillo fight???
Wow
Just log off before your embarrass yourself further
I'm starting to think this guy is giving opinions and making videos as more of a fan then an expert
The worst thing about his videos is how brilliant he makes himself out to be. He made a long meandering video about Golovkin that he finished off by saying "Now you Golovkin fans have something INTELLIGENT to say about him", like he was after decoding the Rosetta Stone.
And what were his groundbreaking findings? That Golovkin has good footwork, is a technically high quality striker, and applies intelligent pressure.
Bravo professor, you basically repeated what everyone says about the guy the first time they watch him. Luckily for us, most of those people didn't bother to make a 20 minute self-congratulatory video about it.
How am I trolling by saying Castillo gets mentioned the most when Floyd is involved. when someone starts a Mayweather-Castillo thread every other week. Or if someone says Floyd is undefeated, someone immediately points to the Castillo fight???
Wow
Ummmmm.....NO. When you think of Castillo, you think of his war with Corrales.
So you are saying people mention the Corrales fight more than the mention the Floyd fight?
I never said who u "think" of. I clearly said which fight gets mentioned the most
I thought Floyd won the fight. It was a close fight that could have gone either way and I wouldn't have been upset if it had gone the other way.
A close fight is not necassarily a robbery just because it doesn't go to your fighter of preference.
With that being said- Floyd did what he was suppose to do by giving him an immediate rematch. And that really should have settled all debate.
The sad part is that Castillo had a decent career and only time he gets mentioned is when people want to talk about the Floyd fight.
Ummmmm.....NO. When you think of Castillo, you think of his war with Corrales.
I thought Floyd won the fight. It was a close fight that could have gone either way and I wouldn't have been upset if it had gone the other way.
A close fight is not necassarily a robbery just because it doesn't go to your fighter of preference.
With that being said- Floyd did what he was suppose to do by giving him an immediate rematch. And that really should have settled all debate.
The sad part is that Castillo had a decent career and only time he gets mentioned is when people want to talk about the Floyd fight.
I was thinking that aswell...
He's try to make claim that Mayweather had done just enough to deserve a 10-10, this is why this guy would never be a judge!
Judges don't very often hand out 10-10's but ofcourse If your name is Floyd Mayweather and the judge happens to be an irrelevant Floyd fanboy any-things possible.
in his judah-mayweather vid he actually gave judah 2 full rounds. unacceptable. floyd was mighty pissed and told him to make another vid where he wins all the rounds!