VADA vs USADA

USADA's record in boxing is not good, the Morales incident is a real black mark against them. And the Quillin incident. USADA is shady as f*ck. Golden Boy's refusal to use VADA instead and the terrible track record so far doesn't make the connection between the two look very good. Im not sure why anyone would choose USADA. They are 5X more expensive, have black marks against them. Morales tested positive, so they tested like 73 samples from him and they still let him fight and then 4 months after said he cheated Because they're knowingly engaging in a farce. That is not all they do, they also declare if he cheated of not. He tested positive and it was pretty clear he cheated (morales) since he tested positive in 2 different samples a week apart. So instead of branding him a cheater and telling the commission to not allow the fight to go on, they "informed them that there might be a violation". Then 5 months later they concluded he cheated This. How do you analyze Quillin/Wright and Morales and say you prefer USADA over VADA? Sh*t makes no sense. A bit too shady, I say.This ^^^^^^

People are hard on USADA but it's up to the promoter's ultimately if they want to continue on with the card or not. Do people actually expect an event to be scrapped like 2 days before if a fighter fails a test? And why aren't the commissions trying to enhance their testing? They literally aren't doing anything despite all this controversy. It's shocking. No it should be up to the commission whether or not a fighter on PED is allowed to fight, but they need to be informed right away when there's a positive test, not several days later. Because it costs a lot of money. He's correct though. How many articles have you seen written about the mistakes conducted by VADA? Can you mention some of their mistakes?

They both good for me as one tests athletes for world competitions and the other just started but is primarly boxing but so far seems good.

Floyd uses USADA so it is criticised. In all seriousness I think that it is ludicrous for people to believe they would sacrifice their reputation over the likes of Morales and Mayweather. This post hit the nail on the head. How about instead of turning everything into an Alex Jones style conspiracy we applaud fighters willing to submit to a better form of testing? All most of you mother ****ers ever do is attempt to discredit something... God damn. Get the **** over it.

People are hard on USADA but it's up to the promoter's ultimately if they want to continue on with the card or not. Do people actually expect an event to be scrapped like 2 days before if a fighter fails a test? And why aren't the commissions trying to enhance their testing? They literally aren't doing anything despite all this controversy. It's shocking. Yeah this is mainly about Golden Boy as they're the one contracting in USADA, and they're dictating most of the terms.

He's correct though. How many articles have you seen written about the mistakes conducted by VADA? None. And they've made some mistakes as well. There's still glaring loopholes in their game just waiting to be taken advantage of. It's so wide open that it's almost comical. The issue is definitely more than it being about one fighter though. That I agree with. Name some glaring holes.

As usual the flomos can only see an issue in terms of how it affects Floyd. This issue is much bigger than Floyd. He's correct though. How many articles have you seen written about the mistakes conducted by VADA? None. And they've made some mistakes as well. There's still glaring loopholes in their game just waiting to be taken advantage of. It's so wide open that it's almost comical. The issue is definitely more than it being about one fighter though. That I agree with.

The flomos are suddenly against boxers and fans who want a clean sport. How things change. ;-|

Floyd uses USADA so it is criticised. In all seriousness I think that it is ludicrous for people to believe they would sacrifice their reputation over the likes of Morales and Mayweather. As usual the flomos can only see an issue in terms of how it affects Floyd. This issue is much bigger than Floyd.

Im not sure why anyone would choose USADA. They are 5X more expensive, have black marks against them. Morales tested positive, so they tested like 73 samples from him and they still let him fight and then 4 months after said he cheated That's precisely why promoters would choose USADA. They don't have any jurisdiction. They just simply tell if they failed the test or not. How can they be at fault because Golden Boy decided to go on with the show? They tell the promoter but they don't inform the commission Floyd uses USADA so it is criticised. In all seriousness I think that it is ludicrous for people to believe they would sacrifice their reputation over the likes of Morales and Mayweather. Their reputation is already tarnished after the Morales incident. At the end of the day they wanna make money, and working with a big promoter like Golden Boy is very profitable.

USADA's record in boxing is not good, the Morales incident is a real black mark against them. not just the morales incident but the quillin vs wright situation as well. USADA destroyed quillin and winky's blood and urine samples because they didn't properly inform them on what they weren't supposed to take....

Floyd uses USADA so it is criticised. In all seriousness I think that it is ludicrous for people to believe they would sacrifice their reputation over the likes of Morales and Mayweather.

Does anyone think the USADA has the same issues with other testing (Olympics)? Or do you feel they are on the best behavior with WADA?

Im not sure why anyone would choose USADA. They are 5X more expensive, have black marks against them. Morales tested positive, so they tested like 73 samples from him and they still let him fight and then 4 months after said he cheated This. How do you analyze Quillin/Wright and Morales and say you prefer USADA over VADA? Sh*t makes no sense. A bit too shady, I say.

They don't have any jurisdiction. They just simply tell if they failed the test or not. How can they be at fault because Golden Boy decided to go on with the show? That is not all they do, they also declare if he cheated of not. He tested positive and it was pretty clear he cheated (morales) since he tested positive in 2 different samples a week apart. So instead of branding him a cheater and telling the commission to not allow the fight to go on, they "informed them that there might be a violation". Then 5 months later they concluded he cheated

They don't have any jurisdiction. They just simply tell if they failed the test or not. How can they be at fault because Golden Boy decided to go on with the show? Because they're knowingly engaging in a farce.

USADA's record in boxing is not good, the Morales incident is a real black mark against them. They don't have any jurisdiction. They just simply tell if they failed the test or not. How can they be at fault because Golden Boy decided to go on with the show?

Im not sure why anyone would choose USADA. They are 5X more expensive, have black marks against them. Morales tested positive, so they tested like 73 samples from him and they still let him fight and then 4 months after said he cheated

USADA seems like the go to place for drug cheats. There's a recent article on FloydHype about how Paulie requested VADA testing with Broner, considering the jump in weight Broner is taking to make the fight. Apparently Broner and his handlers told him "if you want VADA, fight is off." They were literally getting ready to cancel a fight because the agency of THEIR choice wasn't going to be used. Almost sounds like they have something to hide. And hidden it will remain, just like they're known to do. Link http://www.fighthype.com/news/article14405.html USADA is shady as f*ck. Golden Boy's refusal to use VADA instead and the terrible track record so far doesn't make the connection between the two look very good.

USADA's record in boxing is not good, the Morales incident is a real black mark against them. And the Quillin incident.