David Haye

You should have been up front about being female from the beginning. It explains a lot about your posts. I wouldn't have sent you the "kick me" gift had I known you're a girl. Now you know fat boy. So don't be swinging your carwheel body around these blocks.

My guess is a good as yours. No one can determine bf% from one picture with 100% accuracy. true.................

Ali, Foreman, Lewis and most other heavyweight greats were "soft" looking compared to Haye and not as ripped as him. It's not only the looks. I would find it surprising if "damn near every" heavyweight looked like him in the 80's. Ali, Foreman, Lewis were all natural heavyweights. Their big bone structure attributed to them being up at heavyweight unlike guys like Haye, Evander and also Steve Cunningham who put on muscle to be that heavy. It's why all those guys are having stamina issues up at heavyweight, all that useless contracted muscle uses a lot of energy during the fight. Back in Ali's era Kenny Nortan had a body like Haye and he too had stamina problems. Also notive the size of Haye's legs compared to Ali, Haye's lower body is defined like his upper but look at Ali's and you can see it's no wehre near as defined but much bigger than Haye's.

I always thought he was 10-12 My guess is a good as yours. No one can determine bf% from one picture with 100% accuracy.

You're a woman, right? What's the problem with being a woman?

He's always in ridiculous shape. I can't imagine the discipline that must take.

I looked at Haye's website once, and there were many messages posted from his many female and gay admirers. Guess that's why you were there.

Truly said that damn near every HW looked like this in the 80s. Now it is no longer the norm. Ali, Foreman, Lewis and most other heavyweight greats were "soft" looking compared to Haye and not as ripped as him. It's not only the looks. I would find it surprising if "damn near every" heavyweight looked like him in the 80's.

You really think he's that low? At the Enzo weigh-in, yes. About 6-7%. His face has the slight drawn in features also.

I would say 7-9%. I always thought he was 10-12

Probably 6-7%, thats how a heavyweight should look like. You really think he's that low?

Considering the premise of this thread and your sig..........I am thinking you have some sort of odd agenda here. Truly said that damn near every HW looked like this in the 80s. Now it is no longer the norm. Very creative and insightful thinking, I just wonder why you chose to think along those line though.....

I would say 7-9%.

30% at least not much on his body in general but there's a whole lump of the stuff between his ears

WOW what a physique! Mostly useless contracted muscle but it's still a physique to admire. What do you guys think his body fat would be in this pic? http://http://www.theboxingobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/David-Haye-V-Alexander-Povetkin.jpg 30% at least

BTW - he was a Cruiserweight here.

Considering the premise of this thread and your sig..........I am thinking you have some sort of odd agenda here. Truly said that damn near every HW looked like this in the 80s. Now it is no longer the norm.

Probably 6-7%, thats how a heavyweight should look like.

http://www.theboxingobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/David-Haye-V-Alexander-Povetkin.jpg