Even with Common narrating.
It's less forced and the producers are letting the actual events tell the story. Not some contrived view they're putting on the guys.
lol i dont know if i've ever heard a more discreet racist statement....
do people even know all access if from the same creator/producer, ross greesnburg???....
when people say it sucks or not the same.....newsflash, its the same ****!
Everything on Showtime just looks cheaper. Like they try to recreate HBO but with a 1/10th of the budget. It may not be true, but that's how it looks. And Common IS terrible.
I disagree. I always get excited for the 24/7's but can hardly even get through these latest Mayweather/Ghost episodes. Even Jones/Calzaghe was better. There production quality on HBO is better, the narration is better, and the music is better.
I feel like there is really no difference in either show I favor All Access though bc it seems more natural. My favorite All Access was the 2nd episode of the Cotto-Trout All Access it was awesome. When Cotto said to his wife "this is all I know." That was the best line.
I disagree.. Both are good tho. I dont think neither is waay better. Its basically the same damn show
You don't think All-Acess shows more of what the boxers want to be shown, than what HBO wants? Like I said, it feels to me its more natural show, than 24/7s scripted reality based style.
It's the same exact show. Same format, same camera work, same producer, same everything with a different network if more fawning over Floyd because he has creative control as a producer.
There is literally no real difference.
Same commercial, different channel.
I did feel All-Access has seemed more.... real? I guess is the word I'm looking for. 24/7 seemed to me to flow a lot more like it was scripted than anything else.
13y ago
All-Access Is Way Better Than 24/7 | BoxingScene Community