Question for multi sport watchers

Even though there are other sports that have subjective scoring I have not witnessed one that can diverge from the scoring criteria in the way boxing does. The announcers have even added to their commentary the volatility of the judges scoring. Criteria like ring generalship you don't even hear discussed. And what one judges looks at as good defense is viewed as high activity by the one throwing the punch by another judge. I also wonder what training do boxing judges receive if any.

i guess you could say mma, but its more easier to judge, if you get a takedown you win the round and only 3 rounds

Somehow, despite a set of scoring criteria, boxing scoring is very open to interpretation because some judges don't really stick with those criteria. Clean punching is often negated by volume punchers who don't land much (Lara - Williams, Hopkins - Calzaghe) and then you've got the problem of even rounds. Some judges don't like giving them, so will always look for someone to give a round to, some people don't mind giving even rounds... it really is a very difficult sport to judge, really. Do judges have to do any training to get their jobs? Because surely, if they don't, it would be a good idea to do something so judges stick to a similar set of criteria.

yes anything with a subjective scoring system is.... subjective. synchronized diving is 100% subjective, the same way scoring a boxing match is 100% subjective (aside from knockdowns and stoppages, which a ref decides.) boxing is different, though. it's much more often corrupted. it's easily corruptible. promotors pay and select judges. they're the judges bosses. if you want big fights you tote the party line. if it's a local fight the judges are local.

The simple and obvious answer is no. I Agree with you that the answer appears to be simple and obvious but NSB threads have proven to me that it almost never seems to be the case lol. I am certain there is someone here who is going to disagree.

The simple and obvious answer is no.