Who is a better boxer Rigondeaux or Mayweather

You need to man up and stop being a little punk, you think it's cool to rebel against the system when you know you ain't nothing but a little ***** who don't know anything about the sport of boxing. You been on Rigondeaux balls since the first page and appeared on every subsequent page since then proving how much cum you can hold from his nuts by spitting the **** all over every new page in this thread. Even though I layed out reasons why I think Rigo is a better pure boxer, and have defended each and every one of my claims. You're the one that don't know **** about boxing, because you hang onto the status quo, and since there's a million other Floyd sheep, you can get away with saying generic ****, and adding in your little sideline cheerleading. You've also been in this thread on numerous occasions adding in your little quips, because you can't explain your stance. You're a sideline cheerleader and nothing more. Let the big boys debate.

I hope Rigo can garner 20% of the attention he's getting on NSB this week from casual fans in his next fight. #TeamRigo

You need to man up and stop being a little punk, you think it's cool to rebel against the system when you know you ain't nothing but a little ***** who don't know anything about the sport of boxing. You been on Rigondeaux balls since the first page and appeared on every subsequent page since then proving how much cum you can hold from his nuts by spitting the **** all over every new page in this thread. Damn,spitting that ether.lol

Floyd can do everything Rigo can do except for having heart and courage Rigo>>Floyd

I really still dont understand wtf Rigondeaux has to do with Floyd, and why every fighter and every topic on here is somehow brought back to Floyd. Everytime. This is equivalent to asking, "who's a better QB, Peyton Manning or Tom Brady?" Except we're talking about boxers on a boxing site. Don't feel threatened.

Like Floyd said "There are always excuses, no one will ever give me my just due, that's why I don't fight for bragging rights, I prove myself, I prove myself" At first I felt he was being a little *****.. but I feel this man's words more than even. It's blasphemous how much people try to discredit his skills. Man, go sit down with your dramatic ass. Sounding like an emo girl.

Yesterday performance was shoking, Donaire is a special fighter he is top notch Knocking err body! and Rigondeaux schooled him. In my opinion Rigondeaux is the best boxer of my lifetime not Mayweather. What do you guys think? rigo has alot more to prove, time will tell but i think hes a great fighter as long he can keep his focus.

LMAO, Flowmos red K you when you disagree with them. Ex. El *** (suitable name).

Thread back fired LMAO. You little Flowmos always time your post so it's the first post on the next page.

I'm sure he could cherrypeack at 126 the same way Floyd has been cherrypicking at 154, but he definitely does have the skills to dominate 126 if he chose to even while being at a huge weight disadvantage. I was literally gonna bring up the Cotto/ODLH as past prime, and war torn fighters, but I deleted that part. Damn you're good.

Hopkins went up 15 pounds at 40 years old. He was a small LHW who could have easily competed at 168, as shown by his performances at 170lbs against Winky and Pavlik. Mayweather fought at 154 in his 30s, when he was not even that big of a WW. Rigondeaux does not have to come at exactly 126, or 130, or 135, he can come in 4-5lbs lighter like Floyd does at 154. His skills will do the rest for him since he's so good. I got all the love in the world for Hopkins, but he's faced a bunch of tailor made opponents for him, and you can't use Hopkins as an example, because he's an anomaly. We're basing off pure skill. We're comparing Rigo right now vs. 135 Floyd. Not to mention, RIGO is 32. He already comes in light for his fights, or basically the same weight as his weigh in weight. He walks around at 122 lbs. So, basically Rigo was way smaller than Nonito, and he's basically doing the same thing as Floyd. So, Rigo is THAT much of a beast. Rigo's already doing what you're praising FLoyd for.

Hopkins went up 15 pounds at 40 years old. He was a small LHW who could have easily competed at 168, as shown by his performances at 170lbs against Winky and Pavlik. Mayweather fought at 154 in his 30s, when he was not even that big of a WW. Rigondeaux does not have to come at exactly 126, or 130, or 135, he can come in 4-5lbs lighter like Floyd does at 154. His skills will do the rest for him since he's so good. I'm sure he could cherrypeack at 126 the same way Floyd has been cherrypicking at 154, but he definitely does have the skills to dominate 126 if he chose to even while being at a huge weight disadvantage.

They are both smart boxers I would have to go with Mayweather in this one though. He is the better boxer of the two.

Of course I saw it, it was on the Pac undercard. Guill got dropped hard by a jab then ran away the whole fight. It was awful, even HBO was worried. You need to get you're eyes checked. Rigo knocked him down, had him hurt and Ricardo hardly landed a punch and was outlanded nearly two to one. Ricardo's KD was a flashknockdown, Rigo wasn't actually hurt.

It's not about punishment. It's about his actual size. The reason why I brought up 32 is because he's set at this weight. He's not young like Floyd was back then, where he had room to grow. Hopkins went up 15 pounds at 40 years old. He was a small LHW who could have easily competed at 168, as shown by his performances at 170lbs against Winky and Pavlik. Mayweather fought at 154 in his 30s, when he was not even that big of a WW. Rigondeaux does not have to come at exactly 126, or 130, or 135, he can come in 4-5lbs lighter like Floyd does at 154. His skills will do the rest for him since he's so good.

Man, I'm not discrediting Floyd. I'm saying Rigo is a slicker, and more skilled fighter by a HAIR. Like literally, a strand of hair. It doesn't come off that way, because I have to be demonstrative about it, due to the barrage of Flowmos, but that's the nature of the beast when you're on a message board. Ok I can see that happening on here and I do agree to an extent. Ive been dissecting that match alot because rig was amazing defensively.

Guillermo lost to Cordoba. Far worse. You're a retard, I can tell you haven't even watched the fight... Rigo knocked him down and outlanded him nearly two to one. Rigo almost got robbed on the scorecards though.

I get what your saying but you are kind of discrediting an all time great off a fighters one amazing fight. Floyd sets traps too. Alot of fighters do Man, I'm not discrediting Floyd. I'm saying Rigo is a slicker, and more skilled fighter by a HAIR. Like literally, a strand of hair. It doesn't come off that way, because I have to be demonstrative about it, due to the barrage of Flowmos, but that's the nature of the beast when you're on a message board.

I get what your saying but you are kind of discrediting an all time great off a fighters one amazing fight. Floyd sets traps too. Alot of fighters do

Floyd was 3-4 years younger than Rigo when he moved up to welterweight. :pat: People on this site love taking everything out of context... I'm not talking about age though. Any way the older you are, more moving up would benefit you. the only thing Floyd benefited from moving up at a young age was more money in bank account. The size disparity of his opponents hindered his performances, he had to fight more defensive and use every ounce of his intelligence to win fights. Even at 130-135, he was constantly fighting WW's on fight night, and then at WW he was fighting Middleweights. But he still won due to his skills and defensive style. That is why he couldn't knock guys out like he did at 130 anymore.