As for now who is better fighter P4P, Golovkin or Broner?

"Broner: I'll fight anyone from 135-154" https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT45YjGPpczzz0hgBDhdvhBk8c5vR83jiZBTfQj0i7wpcUzWD9lhQ Seriously, how many rounds would it go?

Broner's wins over DeMarco and though a controversial Ponce win > Golovkin's wins over Proksa/Ishida/Rosado.

I really dislike Broner and I like GGG, but the truth is that Broner is better P4P right now. Broner's win over DeMarco is better than anything GGG has done so far. Of course Broner is not top 10 P4P as the Ring magazine says, but right now I would rank him above GGG.

Lmao his win over Gavin Rees is actually better than anything GGG has done :lol1:

As much as I hate to give Broner credit for anything, he is more proven AT THIS TIME with his win over DeMarco who was the champ at lw.

Broner without a doubt.

About a dozen guys 160 would make it through Golvokin's resume without a loss. As much as I think Broner may be overhyped, I don't think you can say the same about him, he's probably in the top 20 p4p at this point.

Broner is more than 5yrs younger, has a better resume and has looked just as good if not better in his recent fights. Yea not a hard choice.

oh, and it's broner, and it's not close. demarco was the top rated LW in the world when he fought broner, and broner absolutely demolished him. It's amazing how great broner looked in that fight and how bad he looked against ponce de Leon.

Who is better? Demarco> proska

you can't let it get to you, man. these things take on a life of their own on boxingscene. you can't let that get in the way of your evaluation of a fighter. you can't hate golovkin for doing everything right. But hes not that is the thing and I find it impossible to evaluate a fighter when hes fought nothing but stiffs. Do I see talent? Absolutely. I see a bit of Mike Tyson in him actually. But I have seen so many guys who have looked like absolute killers that have took a marginal step up and got laced time & time again. When you're fighting journeyman who are a weight class below its actually pretty difficult to not look good. You can't just tell me that Ishida and Rosado are the best that were willing. Hes an olympic gold medalist, hes had 30 pro fights and still not beaten sh1t and people want to mock Rigondeaux and his competition.

The battle of the hype jobs. I say Broner has a little more credibility because he did win against DeMarco.

oh, and it's broner, and it's not close. demarco was the top rated LW in the world when he fought broner, and broner absolutely demolished him.

All this GGG hype is making me hate the guy. He hasn't fought anybody worth a damn and stop going on like the whole worlds scared of him, its embarrassing. you can't let it get to you, man. these things take on a life of their own on boxingscene. you can't let that get in the way of your evaluation of a fighter. you can't hate golovkin for doing everything right.

Neither at this point.

Obviously the one who the entire universe is ****ting bricks of. The one even the aliens on Jupiter are ducking. The one and only Gennady ''The Greatest of all times based on wins over Ishida and Proska'' Golovkin aka ''The whole universe is ducking me so i automatically qualify as the GOAT''.

All this GGG hype is making me hate the guy. He hasn't fought anybody worth a damn and stop going on like the whole worlds scared of him, its embarrassing.

Broner beat the #1 guy in his weight class in his first fight there..call me when Golovkin beats a top 10 middleweight This pretty much sums it up. And isn't he going to get a title at 147 now?

Broner beat the #1 guy in his weight class in his first fight there..call me when Golovkin beats a top 10 middleweight This. GGG hasn't even fought a top 10 lol The only guy who was close was Proksa who was 1-1 with Kerry Hope (A British journeyman with a K.O ratio of around 4%) that just got KTFO by Darren Barker in like 3 rounds.

Broner no doubt. Broner should be top 20, GGG not yet.