Charr hopes to land fight with Haye
"If David Haye fights me, I will donate half of my purse for peace projects in my home country!"
Heavyweight contender Manuel Charr is calling out former world champion David Haye again. “I heard that Haye is still looking for an opponent for his next fight. There’s no need to look any further. I’m right here waiting. Haye himself said that Vitali Klitschko couldn’t beat me – instead Vitali’s doctor won the fight for him. I still want my rematch against Klitschko. And Haye is my way to get there. Let’s do an eliminator for Vitali. I’m ready when you are, David!”
The “Diamond Boy” doesn’t only want to fight for gold and glory, he also wants to fight for the people in his home country Syria. Born as Mahmoud Omeirat Charr in Beirut, Lebanon, he lost his father in a civil war and had to leave Syria to Germany when he was still a child. He made himself a name in his adopted home as “Diamond Boy” Manuel Charr but his heart and his feelings are still with the people in his home country.
“I want to fight for peace and set a sign of hope for Syria. That’s why I will donate half of my purse for peace projects in my home country if David Haye accepts to fight me. I know how it feels to lose your beloved ones in war. We have to stop the killing in the Middle East. I want to become world heavyweight champion not merely for myself but for my people. Everything is possible if we believe in it and fight for it. Peace is possible, too, and it is definitely worth fighting for.”
This may be a bit of a noob question... but what happens if Haye becomes the no. 1 contender with all the ranking organizations?
Does he just get one shot at Wlads title with all belts on the line?
And then a shot at Vitali?
He'd have to choose one or the other and if he were to win he'd be dropped from the other orgs rankings. The ABC orgs make perfect sense, don't they?
This may be a bit of a noob question... but what happens if Haye becomes the no. 1 contender with all the ranking organizations?
Does he just get one shot at Wlads title with all belts on the line?
And then a shot at Vitali?
Remember when Charr showed up at the press conference to challenge David Haye, and Haye had no ****ing idea who he was? He looked so damn confused as he shook Charr's hand. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Lol, he had no idea who he was. In his defense, neither did anyone else though either.
From the interviews I have seen, haye seems like he wants to go down the wbc route as wlad isnt interested in a rematch. Therefore I dont beleive this fight doesnt make sense from a ranking perspective as charr is number 8 and david is number 5. A fight with wbc number 3 johnathon banks seems like the best way of going down the wbc route and then fighting the winner of arreola/stiverne to become mandatory to vitali if he hasnt retired by next year. If vitali retires then haye would have a title shot their against the winner I would presume. Banks is also high ranking with the wbo #2 and ibf #5 and at #8 with the wba. Fury is number 4 with the wbc but he is busy fighting cunningham who isnt top #15 ranked by the wbc. However the fight I would rather see from a competitive point of view is haye vs povetkin, plus haye is wba #1 and should then be wlads manditory. I would also be happy with haye vs pulev who is ibf #1 but poorly ranked to banks in comparrison in other rankings.
Remember when Charr showed up at the press conference to challenge David Haye, and Haye had no ****ing idea who he was? He looked so damn confused as he shook Charr's hand. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
That is correct. If it's good enough for Vitali to fight Chisora and Charr then there's no problem with Haye doing it.
Chisora was basically a gaurenteed good fight against Haye anyway, Charr? He really doesn't belong in another big fight.
Good post.
Is that really a bad way to get to Vits? I mean if he was good enough for the (paper) champion to fight than he should be good enough for Haye to fight. Personally I think it was a crap fight by Vits and would be a crap fight by Haye. But if its good for one it should be for the other. Jmo.
That is correct. If it's good enough for Vitali to fight Chisora and Charr then there's no problem with Haye doing it.
Chisora was basically a gaurenteed good fight against Haye anyway, Charr? He really doesn't belong in another big fight.
I hope not.
Charr is only a tiny bit 'relevant' because Vitali fought him. Had Vitali not done that he would still be a nothing who offers very little. If Haye fights him it will be purely to try and beat him better than Vitali did, just as Haye did with Chisora.
Is that really a bad way to get to Vits? I mean if he was good enough for the (paper) champion to fight than he should be good enough for Haye to fight. Personally I think it was a crap fight by Vits and would be a crap fight by Haye. But if its good for one it should be for the other. Jmo.
I hope not.
Charr is only a tiny bit 'relevant' because Vitali fought him. Had Vitali not done that he would still be a nothing who offers very little. If Haye fights him it will be purely to try and beat him better than Vitali did, just as Haye did with Chisora.
why are you discussing Charr anyway? I thought it was common knowledge that he was picked by Klitschko to lose because he not a contender.
It is common knowledge. What I posted was an article from another site.
I guess it would not be the worst comeback fight ever, but Charr is nothing special and I would expect Haye to fight someone a bit better the next time out.
I would watch it but I am not real picky when it comes to boxing.
Ahh ****kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk. I don't want to see that ****.
But you're right Jab; it's a fight that, at least on paper, makes a lot of sense. Tyson actually suggested a while back that Haye not fight the Klitschkos until he fought a number of common opponents, to see how he fares against guys that the Klitschkos already beat. If Haye beats Charr, he'll have beat Vitali's last two opponents coming directly from challenging him.
Good suggestion. ****in' mismatch, though.