Has anyone at the Mayweather Camp commented on Mickey Bey's doping?

Flowmoe Logic: "Pacquiao is juicing even though there isnt a shred of steroid evidence against him." "Andre Berto failed a failed a steroid test? It doesnt count because its an old steroid that nobody uses." :nonono:

Man I don't buy this I didn't know bs. Same sh1t with PEDerson that he forgot. There's Google to search that sh1t and there's Nevada's phone # to ask about it. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I asked Chris Robinson to ask Floyd Sr about that but he didn't. It's funny because he has many interviews with Floyd Sr and he asks him about pretty much anything that goes on in the sport. I haven't spoke to Floyd Sr. about it because I am waiting to speak with Mickey Bey first.. Been texting with Mickey and he tells me that we will talk soon, I'll keep you posted.. As for Floyd Sr., I've had conversations with him in the past and he always tells me that he tries to stay away from anything related to PEDs in converation to due the Pacquiao lawsuit against the Mayweathers.. But since this is related to his fighter it's worth asking.. I can catch up with him when I get back in town - CR

If he said that he would look like a prick. Try again...in fact, let me help you, flojob. What he should say is 'He is one of my fighters and I have tried to set the standard as high as possible for keeping the sport clean and I expect the same from the fighters in my stable. We will wait until we know all the facts, but if he is guilty of this offence he will be treated in the harshest manner possible by Mayweather promotions. There is no second chance with me if you are juicing'. So you wouldnt recommend he made a statement of that order. What a turnip.:nonono:

If he said that he would look like a prick. Try again...in fact, let me help you, flojob. What he should say is 'He is one of my fighters and I have tried to set the standard as high as possible for keeping the sport clean and I expect the same from the fighters in my stable. We will wait until we know all the facts, but if he is guilty of this offence he will be treated in the harshest manner possible by Mayweather promotions. There is no second chance with me if you are juicing'.[/QU shut your silly as up.

:haha: If Floyd was like Bob Arum he would find all sorts of reasons to excuse his fighter. Just like Arum did with Chavez Jr both times that he's been caught with something. Well then surely Floyd should behave to a higher standard than that old cunt then, no? Your post makes absolutely no sense, its just fanboy stuff.:nonono:

Isn't your opinion biased by you being a gigantic Pac tard? He's right by the way. If USADA didn't give Lance Armstrong a pass then there's no way that Floyd is getting away with anything either. I'm not even a pacquiao fan you turd???:thinking: And again, thats just you speculating.

So a fighters promoter shouldnt have to say anything about his fighter being caught juicing?.....could you imagine what these turds would say if Arum said fuck all in the same situation??? :haha: If Floyd was like Bob Arum he would find all sorts of reasons to excuse his fighter. Just like Arum did with Chavez Jr both times that he's been caught with something.

I love VADA and USADA...they're both badly needed organizations... if you think one is better than the other or vice versa, you're a butthurt moron.

thats just complete nonsense, just your opinion an is heavily nuanced by you being a massive floyd fan. Isn't your opinion biased by you being a gigantic Pac tard? He's right by the way. If USADA didn't give Lance Armstrong a pass then there's no way that Floyd is getting away with anything either.

That's what we call a double edged sword. Doesn't matter what he does/say he will be criticized. That's the position Mayweather puts himself in. His best bet is playing the victim role by saying his fighter didn't know what the doctor gave him. But I'd call bs on that. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android Nah it is what I'd call you figuring out how you're going to hate no matter what.

Lol, what a weak response. Yes, if I were to bet... Now you can take the foolish route and believe VADA or USADA are corrupt organizations if you want. USADA just went through a lot of drama with the Lance Armstrong case, and you want us to sit here and believe they'd protect Floyd Mayweather. Please. And if Floyd is indeed doping, I'd bet USADA is not aware of it. He'd have to be doing something to beat their tests like Lance Armstrong did. But no, you got morons like you who think these organizations with huge international reputations, will purposefully protect Floyd Mayweather of all people. Comical. :) Not at all...your naivety and nuthuggery are comical.

Willing to bet?? thats just complete nonsense, just your opinion an is heavily nuanced by you being a massive floyd fan. This also applies to your second paragraph. Lol, what a weak response. Yes, if I were to bet... Now you can take the foolish route and believe VADA or USADA are corrupt organizations if you want. USADA just went through a lot of drama with the Lance Armstrong case, and you want us to sit here and believe they'd protect Floyd Mayweather. Please. And if Floyd is indeed doping, I'd bet USADA is not aware of it. He'd have to be doing something to beat their tests like Lance Armstrong did. But no, you got morons like you who think these organizations with huge international reputations, will purposefully protect Floyd Mayweather of all people. Comical. :)

No organization is immune from being corrupt. But if I had to make a bet, I would bet that VADA is more likely to fall to corruption than USADA. USADA has a way greater reputation and a lot more to lose than does VADA. But both organizations are very unlikely to fall to corruption at this present time. There's always a possibility, what I'm saying is that it's just very unlikely to happen. A for-profit organization is far more likely to fall to corruption because they are out to make a profit. Their business relies on profit aka making money. A non-profit though, it's business is not based on generating profit. So a non-profit can lose money every single year (and many do). And if a non-profit is caught as a profit business in disguise, the penalty is severe (prison time, big fines, etc). The situations are completely different. But of course, again, corruption can happen with anything -- church, school, business, etc. Willing to bet?? thats just complete nonsense, just your opinion an is heavily nuanced by you being a massive floyd fan. This also applies to your second paragraph.

I am starting to think thats a distinct possibility, and lol at all these flojobs claiming that because USADA are a non profit organisation they are immune from being corrupt in any way. It strikes me that if you arent making a profit you would be a prime candidate to be the grateful recipient of a brown envelope. Its not even naivety on the part of the floyd fans, its just bumsniffing...embarrasing.:nonono: No organization is immune from being corrupt. But if I had to make a bet, I would bet that VADA is more likely to fall to corruption than USADA. USADA has a way greater reputation and a lot more to lose than does VADA. But both organizations are very unlikely to fall to corruption at this present time. There's always a possibility, what I'm saying is that it's just very unlikely to happen. A for-profit organization is far more likely to fall to corruption because they are out to make a profit. Their business relies on profit aka making money. A non-profit though, it's business is not based on generating profit. So a non-profit can lose money every single year (and many do). And if a non-profit is caught as a profit business in disguise, the penalty is severe (prison time, big fines, etc). The situations are completely different. But of course, again, corruption can happen with anything -- church, school, business, etc.

Quote: Originally Posted by 1PunchKOPOW! I believe Mayweather was recently interviewed on Jim Rome and was asked what was the most important thing to him and he replied with "loyalty". Throwing someone under the bus is not very loyal is it? But then again we know how hypocritical Floyd is. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android What would you have Floyd do? If he slates the guy for doping he's a hypocrite for his statements on wanting to clean the sport up. If he throws the guy under the bus he is a hypocrite for not showing loyalty. That being said I wouldn't say throwing the under the bus is disloyal as it can argued that the fighter betrayed Mayweather's trust by juicing in the first place. That's what we call a double edged sword. Doesn't matter what he does/say he will be criticized. That's the position Mayweather puts himself in. His best bet is playing the victim role by saying his fighter didn't know what the doctor gave him. But I'd call bs on that. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I believe Mayweather was recently interviewed on Jim Rome and was asked what was the most important thing to him and he replied with "loyalty". Throwing someone under the bus is not very loyal is it? But then again we know how hypocritical Floyd is. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android What would you have Floyd do? If he slates the guy for doping he's a hypocrite for his statements on wanting to clean the sport up. If he throws the guy under the bus he is a hypocrite for not showing loyalty. That being said I wouldn't say throwing the under the bus is disloyal as it can argued that the fighter betrayed Mayweather's trust by juicing in the first place.

To be honest. Mayweather should just throw the kid under the bus. He's never going to become a big star and he's not exactly earning Mayweather a lot of money. The good press he'd receive publicly slating his own fighter would do wonders. I believe Mayweather was recently interviewed on Jim Rome and was asked what was the most important thing to him and he replied with "loyalty". Throwing someone under the bus is not very loyal is it? But then again we know how hypocritical Floyd is. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

To be honest. Mayweather should just throw the kid under the bus. He's never going to become a big star and he's not exactly earning Mayweather a lot of money. The good press he'd receive publicly slating his own fighter would do wonders.

Quote: Originally Posted by 1PunchKOPOW! To this day I believe Floyd is the dirtiest fighter in the game. I'm talking about Lance Armstrong dirty. Like blood transfusions and all. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android I am starting to think thats a distinct possibility, and lol at all these flojobs claiming that because USADA are a non profit organisation they are immune from being corrupt in any way. It strikes me that if you arent making a profit you would be a prime candidate to be the grateful recipient of a brown envelope. Its not even naivety on the part of the floyd fans, its just bumsniffing...embarrasing. This has been my suspicion since before the rumors by those guys over at Maxboxing. Once those reports came out they further confirmed my suspicions. :lol1: @ bumsniffing Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android