Has Mexican Boxing taken a hit?there are so few Mexican champions now

Fuk the world cup! Olympics only come around every 4 years, Olympic Gold is better then any world cup trophy. Well, the World Cup happens every 4 years too......

Really? Really now? its not but the u.s have not won any of either though, lol, why you discredit usain bolts titles by the way, lol, you imply that olympic gold dont matter in away so you are in a foolish way saying usains olympic gold dont matter you lame azz fool:bottle:

Fuk the world cup! Olympics only come around every 4 years, Olympic Gold is better then any world cup trophy. Really? Really now?

damn yo... i got :owned: Well done. http://www.cre8asiteforums.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/applause.gif :nana: you supid ****, lol, you got owned:bottle:

Damn larry has gone full racial mode. First people are accusing you of calling them a "spic" in karma messages and now this? Thought you were above this type of stuff.

Ring Magazine's Rated Fighters By Country 1. Mexico - 29 2. USA - 26 3. UK - 19 The Mexico stat doesn't include Mexican-Americans. Generally speaking, I think it's fair to say Mexicans are the dominant force in the sport. Thank you sir, now where's Ashy Larry what you got to say about that?

Why is it that everytime bosshogg or w/e is around we get these kinds of threads? Like why isn't this guy perm banned? It never ever fails.

Ring Magazine's Rated Fighters By Country 1. Mexico - 29 2. USA - 26 3. UK - 19 The Mexico stat doesn't include Mexican-Americans. Generally speaking, I think it's fair to say Mexicans are the dominant force in the sport. Dam not too shabby:boxing:

Ring Magazine's Rated Fighters By Country 1. Mexico - 29 2. USA - 26 3. UK - 19 The Mexico stat doesn't include Mexican-Americans. Generally speaking, I think it's fair to say Mexicans are the dominant force in the sport.

Then when a Mexican fighter fights a Mexican American fighter, they refuse to support the Mexican American and say he's not a real Mexican. LMAO Not me I was rooting for Garcia when he fought Salido, I watched with my dad who was pretty upset how Garcia dominated but I knew it from the start.:boxing:

Actually i am. And he indeed is. These were the ratings at Cruiserweight at the time of their fight. #1 & #2 faced off. There was a winner at the end of their contest. Therefore lineage was re-established at Cruiserweight. I'm rite. u b wrong dawg. :nana: They were just Ring #1 and #2, Huck was the consensus #1 or #2 on all rankings. Sorry bro, he's a paper Ring Champ but he isnt a lineal champ, which doesnt follow the Ring :owned2: Sorry bruh, got back to surfing Boxrec :lol1:

I love how fans of Mexican fighters take credit for Chicanos as Mexican fighters, they are fighters from the United States. Then when a Mexican fighter fights a Mexican American fighter, they refuse to support the Mexican American and say he's not a real Mexican. LMAO

damn yo... i got :owned: Well done. http://www.cre8asiteforums.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/applause.gif But THIS Is some pretty shaky logic. They claim Cunningham deserves to be rated below Huck, despite defeating him H2H, based off a a shoddy technical descision loss? And what about Huck's questionable decision against Lebedev? Even though he was rated above Steve Cunningham for approximately 2 seconds, the case they made for such a rating was rather flimsy. And Huck wasn't present in the division at the time of Cunningham-Hernandez, so really... :nana: :lol1: Now the same rankings you posted before, you're not accepting You got owned. Pablo is not a lineal champ, he's still a paper champ sorry

make sure you report BossHogs threads aswell then Man Larry u r seriously a lil b I tch! Quit your fooken complaining u sound like a little 2nd grader. Wtf ????

Wow.. this site has a real problem with people from different countries or ethnic groups hating on each other, doesn't it? :rofl:

That's the way it works with the RING buddy, check their rules. If the #1 isnt fighting the #2 or #3 guy then the #2 and #3 guy can fight for the belt. First of all the Ring is NOT the lineal title, i repeat, it is NOT the lineal title. 2nd of all nothing was preventing a Huck fighting Pablo. THey just dropped Huck from the CW rankings when he signed to fight Povetkin, and on their rankings Pablo and Steve were #1 and #2 for their rematch. I dont know whats worse, neither guy fighting for a "lineal title" is #1 in the division or the fact that the fake lineal title is decided on an immediate rematch with the #2 and #3 guy, where the #3 guy is also coming off a loss. No matter which way you look at it, Pablo is not a lineal champ. A Ring champ can be #2 vs #5, so Shinsuke Yamanaka can fight Malcolm Tunacao for the ring BW title. Yea i know, "who?"

So i was wrong, seems Huck was actually #1 when Pablo won the lineal title being ranked #2 against #3 Steve, its even worse then i remembered :lol1: That's the way it works with the RING buddy, check their rules. If the #1 isnt fighting the #2 or #3 guy then the #2 and #3 guy can fight for the belt.

So i was wrong, seems Huck was actually #1 when Pablo won the lineal title being ranked #2 against #3 Steve, its even worse then i remembered :lol1:

:banana::banana: http://prodesa.com.ni/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=409:ring-ratings-update-cruiserweight-shakeup&Itemid=134 The Germany-based Cuban put Cunningham down and hurt him in the first round and won fairly consistently on two cards (58-55 and 59-54) while barely losing on the third (56-57). Thus, Hernandez (25-1, 13 knockouts) must be included in the ratings. The question is: Where? Several members of the RING Advisory Panel suggested that Hernandez enter at No. 1 with Cunningham (24-3, 12 KOs) slipping only to No. 2 because of the unusual victory. A few thought that No. 2 Marco Huck should be elevated to No. 1, with Hernandez coming at around No. 4. In the end, the RING Editorial Board decided that Hernandez didn’t prove enough in the abbreviated fight to overtake all 10 200-pounders in the ratings and claim the top spot. We also couldn’t leave Cunningham at No. 1 after a loss, however controversial it was. That opened the door for Huck to move to the top of the list. The Serbian’s only loss came against Cunningham, who won by a 12th-round knockout, but that was four years ago. Huck (33-1, 24 KOs) is 14-0 since against solid opposition. And the WBO titleholder has made seven successful defenses. Huck’s body of work certainly is better than that of Hernandez, who is just beginning to make his mark. The saving grace for a very frustrated Cunningham might be a rematch with Hernandez, which certainly is appropriate after the painful manner in which he lost his title and No. 1 rating. If he gets the rematch and wins convincingly, then we’ll have to revisit the thought process that resulted in today’s changes. Meanwhile, a few members of the advisory panel suggested that Darren Barker’s performance against Sergio Martinez on Saturday was good enough to propel him into the middleweight ratings. The Englishman gave Martinez a tougher-than-expected challenge before he was stopped in 11th round in Atlantic City, N.J. However, the editorial board couldn’t justify replacing any of the Top 10 by a fighter who was losing on all three cards and ultimately was knocked out. Barker demonstrated that he’s a very good boxer. He’ll undoubtedly get more opportunities to take part in major fights. If he wins the next time, he’ll have a good chance of claiming a spot in the ratings. RING RATINGS UPDATE Cruiserweight Yoan Pablo Hernandez (unrated last week) enters at No. 2 after defeating No. 1 Steve Cunningham, who drops to No. 3. Marco Huck (No. 2 last week) ascends to No. 1. :banana::banana:

RussianCrushin, Can you please provide a source showing Huck being rated above Cunningham prior to the Hernandez fight? And thanx in advance. :cool2: This is common knowledge. He was only rated above Steve in the rematch. Sorry that you need Boxrec and google for everything